Products
Tested using Methodology v0.14
Updated Aug 27, 2026 03:28 PM
SEE PRICE
Asics.com
Tested using Methodology v0.14
Updated Aug 27, 2026 01:42 PM
SEE PRICE
Asics.com
Heel Stack Height
40.0 mm
Weight
129.3 g (4.56 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
6.8 mm
Plate
Plastic
Heel Stack Height
39.5 mm
Weight
165.5 g (5.84 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
4.7 mm
Plate
Carbon Fiber
Our Verdict
ASICS METASPEED RAY
ASICS METASPEED EDGE TOKYO
The ASICS METASPEED RAY is lighter than the ASICS METASPEED EDGE TOKYO and offers more bounce at faster paces, making it the better pick for mid-to-forefoot strikers chasing maximum race-day efficiency. The EDGE TOKYO is more stable and better suited to longer races, especially for cadence-driven runners or those who land farther back. Get the RAY for maximum speed; get the EDGE TOKYO for the more approachable marathon racer.
Variants
- METASPEED RAY (White/Flash Red - (Men - US 9))
- METASPEED RAY (White/Flash Red - (Women - US 7))
- METASPEED EDGE TOKYO (Flash Red/Black - (Men - US 9))
- METASPEED EDGE TOKYO (Flash Red/Black - (Women - US 7))
Main Differences for
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Threshold
Half/Full Marathon Racing
8.6
8.6
Weight
9.7
9.0
Full Comparison
Design
Weight
9.7
9.0
Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Weight
129.3 g (4.56 oz)
165.5 g (5.84 oz)
Stack Heights
Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Stack Height
40.0 mm
39.5 mm
Forefoot Stack Height
34.5 mm
34.8 mm
Heel-To-Toe Drop
6.8 mm
4.7 mm
Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
5.0 mm
5.0 mm
External Shape
3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Outsole Heel Width
71 mm (2.8")
75 mm (3.0")
Outsole Arch Width
62 mm (2.5")
74 mm (2.9")
Outsole Forefoot Width
94 mm (3.7")
106 mm (4.2")
Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
1.78
1.90
Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
2.72
3.05
Internal Shape
3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Internal Length
268 mm (10.6")
265 mm (10.4")
Internal Heel Width
54 mm (2.1")
54 mm (2.1")
Internal Forefoot Width
89 mm (3.5")
90 mm (3.5")
Wide Sizing Available
No
No
Forefoot Fit: Width
9.2
6.9
Forefoot Width Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation
-1.5 mm (-0.059")
-4.3 mm (-0.170")
Toe TTS Deviation
-2.2 mm (-0.088")
-5.0 mm (-0.196")
Forefoot Fit: Height
9.5
10
Forefoot Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe TTS Deviation
-1.1 mm (-0.041")
3.5 mm (0.139")
Arch Fit: Width
7.9
6.3
Arch Fit Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Arch Width TTS Deviation
-3.4 mm (-0.134")
-5.4 mm (-0.214")
Length Fit
10
7.0
Toe Clearance Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Rocker Geometry
8.5
4.0
Heel Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Spring
38 mm (1.5")
9 mm (0.4")
Heel Apex Position
16.5%
14.8%
Heel Rocker Angle
39.6°
12.7°
Forefoot Rocker Geometry
7.6
7.8
Forefoot Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe Spring
52 mm (2.0")
53 mm (2.1")
Toe Apex Position
63.1%
63.1%
Forefoot Rocker Angle
26.8°
27.9°
Foam
Primary Foam Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Secondary Foam Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Primary Foam Name
FF LEAP
FF LEAP
Primary Foam Type
A-TPU
A-TPU
Secondary Foam Name
N/A
FF TURBO PLUS
Secondary Foam Type
N/A
PEBA
Laces
Laces Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Lace Type
Sawtooth
Sawtooth
Width
5.0 mm (0.2")
5.0 mm (0.2")
Thickness
1.2 mm (0.0")
1.1 mm (0.0")
Stretch
6.5%
7.5%
Other Features
Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Tongue Gusset Type
Non-gusseted
Non-gusseted
Plate
Plastic
Carbon Fiber
Performance
Heel Compression Energy Return
8.7
8.7
Heel Compression Video
Heel Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Heel Energy Return
85.4%
85.1%
Forefoot Compression Energy Return
9.0
8.3
Forefoot Compression Video
Forefoot Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Energy Return
88.0%
82.9%
Heel Cushioning
9.1
8.2
Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 550N
5.21 J
4.04 J
Energy Absorbed At 1100N
11.54 J
9.93 J
Energy Absorbed At 1900N
17.92 J
16.17 J
Forefoot Cushioning
8.8
8.4
Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 800N
5.68 J
5.10 J
Energy Absorbed At 1300N
9.62 J
9.11 J
Energy Absorbed At 2050N
14.37 J
13.70 J
Heel Firmness
4.2
6.4
Heel Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 550N
27.0 N/mm
35.5 N/mm
Firmness At 1100N
38.6 N/mm
47.8 N/mm
Firmness At 1900N
57.7 N/mm
69.5 N/mm
Forefoot Firmness
4.7
7.6
Forefoot Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 800N
43.6 N/mm
55.9 N/mm
Firmness At 1300N
58.5 N/mm
71.3 N/mm
Firmness At 2050N
82 N/mm
97 N/mm
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
8.3
8.7
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 10km
9.16 J
9.79 J
Energy Absorbed At 20km
9.04 J
9.60 J
Energy Absorbed At 30km
8.91 J
9.49 J
Energy Absorbed At 40km
8.82 J
9.42 J
Rocker Stiffness
6.5
8.3
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Video
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Force To Flatten The Rocker
72 N
132 N
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
8.7
8.4
Forefoot Bending Video
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
77.6%
74.7%
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
8.0
7.8
Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Bending Resistance
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
23.0 N/mm
18.2 N/mm
Forefoot Bending Force
283 N
296 N
To access
Become a member
unlimited full product reviews,
product prices, and
other exclusive site features
ASICS METASPEED RAY
ASICS METASPEED EDGE TOKYO
Comments
ASICS METASPEED RAY vs ASICS METASPEED EDGE TOKYO: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.