HOKA Mach X 3 vs ASICS SONICBLAST

Which Running Shoe Is Better?

Products

HOKA Mach X 3
ASICS SONICBLAST

Tested using Methodology v0.9

Updated Oct 27, 2025 02:35 PM

SEE PRICE
Hoka.com

Tested using Methodology v0.9

Updated Nov 20, 2025 06:50 PM

SEE PRICE
Amazon.com

Our Verdict

HOKA Mach X 3

ASICS SONICBLAST

The HOKA Mach X 3 and the ASICS SONICBLAST are both plated super trainers, but they emphasize different qualities. The Mach X 3 leans more toward cushioning and softness, with a geometry and bending stiffness that make it particularly well-suited for long runs where rolling efficiency matters most. It's also slightly heavier than the SONICBLAST, though it delivers a more forgiving, cushioned feel over extended miles. The SONICBLAST, on the other hand, is the bouncier option, especially noticeable in the heel, giving it a livelier and more energetic character at a range of paces. 

0 

Variants

  • Mach X 3 (Neon Citrus/Neon Lime - (Men - US 9))
  • Mach X 3 (Neon Rose/Neon Tangerine - (Women - US 7))
  • Mach X 3 (White/Neon Lime - (Women - US 7))
  • Mach X 3 (White/Neon Tangerine - (Men - US 9))
  • SONICBLAST (Black/Blue Fade - (Women - US 7))
  • SONICBLAST (Citron/Tranquil Teal - (Men - US 9))
  • SONICBLAST (Cream/Blue Fade - (Men - US 9))
  • SONICBLAST (Cream/Blue Fade - (Women - US 7))
  • SONICBLAST (Dark Pink Clay/White - (Women - US 7))
  • SONICBLAST (Winter Sea/Stillwater - (Men - US 9))

Main Differences for
Marathon Racing

Threshold 

0.10

Marathon Racing 

7.4
7.7

Heel Energy Return 
 

4.6
8.2

Plate 
 

Plastic
3/4-Length Plastic Plate

Weight  

5.7
6.2

Full Comparison

Design

Weight  

5.7
6.2

Right Shoe Weight Photo  

Left Shoe Weight Photo  

Weight 
 

267.6 g (9.44 oz)
256.1 g (9.03 oz)
Show Text 

Stack Heights 
 

Stack Height Photo  

Heel Stack Height 
 

46.6 mm
47.0 mm

Forefoot Stack Height 
 

39.0 mm
37.1 mm

Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

7.6 mm
9.9 mm

Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

5.0 mm
8.0 mm

External Shape 
 

3D Model Full Shoe  

Outsole Heel Width 
 

87 mm (3.4")
91 mm (3.6")

Outsole Arch Width 
 

74 mm (2.9")
72 mm (2.8")

Outsole Forefoot Width 
 

109 mm (4.3")
112 mm (4.4")

Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

1.87
1.94

Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

2.79
3.02

Internal Shape 
 

3D Model Internal  

Internal Length 
 

275 mm (10.8")
281 mm (11.1")

Internal Heel Width 
 

59 mm (2.3")
65 mm (2.6")

Internal Forefoot Width 
 

91 mm (3.6")
91 mm (3.6")

Wide Sizing Available 
 

Yes
No
Show Text 

Other Features  

Other Features Photo  

Tongue Gusset Type 
 

Non-gusseted
Semi-gusseted

Plate 
 

Plastic
3/4-Length Plastic Plate
Show Text 
Performance

Heel Energy Return 
 

4.6
8.2

Heel Compression Video  

Heel Energy Return  

See details
See details

Heel Energy Return 
 

71.4%
81.8%
Show Text 

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

7.9
8.2

Forefoot Compression Video  

Forefoot Energy Return  

See details
See details

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

80.3%
81.8%
Show Text 

Heel Cushioning 
 

8.6
8.8

Heel Cushioning Picture  

Heel Cushioning  

See details
See details

Energy Absorbed At 550N 
 

3.92 J
3.67 J

Energy Absorbed At 1100N 
 

10.67 J
11.06 J

Energy Absorbed At 1900N 
 

18.05 J
20.36 J
Show Text 

Forefoot Cushioning 
 

8.8
9.0

Forefoot Cushioning Picture  

Forefoot Cushioning  

See details
See details

Energy Absorbed At 800N 
 

5.62 J
5.47 J

Energy Absorbed At 1300N 
 

9.71 J
10.34 J

Energy Absorbed At 2050N 
 

14.37 J
15.45 J
Show Text 

Heel Firmness 
 

4.7
4.1

Heel Firmness  

See details
See details

Firmness At 550N 
 

45.4 N/mm
46.5 N/mm

Firmness At 1100N 
 

97.6 N/mm
82.7 N/mm

Firmness At 1900N 
 

229.1 N/mm
178.9 N/mm
Show Text 

Forefoot Firmness 
 

7.1
6.5

Forefoot Firmness  

See details
See details

Firmness At 800N 
 

87.7 N/mm
74.0 N/mm

Firmness At 1300N 
 

177.8 N/mm
157.5 N/mm

Firmness At 2050N 
 

348.2 N/mm
328.4 N/mm
Show Text 

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning 
 

8.2
8.3

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning  

See details
See details

Energy Absorbed At 10km 
 

9.07 J
9.22 J

Energy Absorbed At 20km 
 

8.86 J
9.00 J

Energy Absorbed At 30km 
 

8.71 J
8.84 J

Energy Absorbed At 40km 
 

8.61 J
8.73 J

HOKA Mach X 3

ASICS SONICBLAST

Comments

  1. Comparison

HOKA Mach X 3 vs ASICS SONICBLAST: Main Discussion

What do you think of these products? Let us know below.


Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Insiders have direct access to buying advice on our insider forum.

PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
No comments yet, refresh to see new ones