Products
Tested using Methodology v0.15
Updated Sep 03, 2026 08:40 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Tested using Methodology v0.16
Updated Sep 25, 2026 03:57 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Heel Stack Height
37.8 mm
Weight
212.9 g (7.51 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
7.5 mm
Plate
Carbon Fiber
Heel Stack Height
39.2 mm
Weight
227.0 g (8.01 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
6.8 mm
Plate
Carbon Fiber
Our Verdict
ANTA C202 7
ASICS YOGIRI SPEED
The ANTA C202 7 is a better shoe for heel strikers than the ASICS YOGIRI SPEED, which is more biased toward forefoot strikers. The ANTA is also lighter and cheaper, so it's a good option for any runners willing to trade some cushioning for efficiency or a lower price. But both of these carbon-plated shoes will suit a wider swath of the marathon running pack than more elite super shoes.
Variants
- C202 7 (Black/Silver - (Men - US 9))
- C202 7 (Black/Silver - (Women - US 7))
- YOGIRI SPEED (Aquarium/White - (Men - US 9))
- YOGIRI SPEED (Aquarium/White - (Women - US 7))
Main Differences for
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Threshold
Half/Full Marathon Racing
7.9
7.9
Weight
7.7
7.3
Full Comparison
Design
Weight
7.7
7.3
Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Weight
212.9 g (7.51 oz)
227.0 g (8.01 oz)
Stack Heights
Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Stack Height
37.8 mm
39.2 mm
Forefoot Stack Height
30.3 mm
32.4 mm
Heel-To-Toe Drop
7.5 mm
6.8 mm
Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
8.0 mm
6.0 mm
External Shape
3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Outsole Heel Width
84 mm (3.3")
80 mm (3.1")
Outsole Arch Width
64 mm (2.5")
72 mm (2.8")
Outsole Forefoot Width
108 mm (4.3")
106 mm (4.2")
Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
2.22
2.04
Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
3.56
3.27
Internal Shape
3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Internal Length
272 mm (10.7")
268 mm (10.6")
Internal Heel Width
64 mm (2.5")
54 mm (2.1")
Internal Forefoot Width
91 mm (3.6")
88 mm (3.5")
Wide Sizing Available
No
No
Forefoot Fit: Width
9.1
9.7
Forefoot Width Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation
4.1 mm (0.163")
-1.0 mm (-0.039")
Toe TTS Deviation
1.3 mm (0.049")
-0.8 mm (-0.031")
Forefoot Fit: Height
7.9
5.9
Forefoot Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe TTS Deviation
-2.6 mm (-0.100")
-4.9 mm (-0.191")
Arch Fit: Width
4.7
7.9
Arch Fit Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Arch Width TTS Deviation
-7.3 mm (-0.285")
-3.5 mm (-0.138")
Length Fit
7.0
10
Toe Clearance Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Rocker Geometry
8.1
6.8
Heel Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Spring
27 mm (1.1")
17 mm (0.7")
Heel Apex Position
17.4%
15.9%
Heel Rocker Angle
28.4°
20.7°
Forefoot Rocker Geometry
7.9
7.9
Forefoot Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe Spring
56 mm (2.2")
55 mm (2.2")
Toe Apex Position
63.4%
64.7%
Forefoot Rocker Angle
28.1°
28.8°
Foam
Primary Foam Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Secondary Foam Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Primary Foam Name
Not Advertised
FF LEAP
Primary Foam Type
Unknown
A-TPU
Secondary Foam Name
No Secondary Foam
FF BLAST PLUS
Secondary Foam Type
No Secondary Foam
Unknown
Laces
Laces Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Lace Type
Flat
Sawtooth
Width
4.0 mm (0.2")
4.0 mm (0.2")
Thickness
1.9 mm (0.1")
1.3 mm (0.0")
Stretch
7.0%
8.0%
Breathability
7.5
Breathability Video
Upper Breathability
Upper Microscope Photo
Time-To-Dry
8.5
Time-To-Dry Timelapse
Time-To-Dry Graph
Preview Graph
Time To 30% Dry
5.3 hrs
Time To 70% Dry
13.7 hrs
Time To Dry
19.3 hrs
Water Absorption
9.3
Dry Weight Photo
Wet Weight Photo
Water Absorbed
27.7%
Other Features
Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Tongue Gusset Type
Non-gusseted
Non-gusseted
Plate
Carbon Fiber
Carbon Fiber
Performance
Heel Compression Energy Return
7.2
5.6
Heel Compression Video
Heel Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Heel Energy Return
76.7%
72.7%
Forefoot Compression Energy Return
7.6
7.9
Forefoot Compression Video
Forefoot Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Energy Return
78.6%
80.1%
Heel Cushioning
8.2
8.1
Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 550N
4.21 J
3.47 J
Energy Absorbed At 1100N
9.90 J
10.06 J
Energy Absorbed At 1900N
15.90 J
17.46 J
Forefoot Cushioning
7.9
8.7
Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 800N
4.94 J
5.65 J
Energy Absorbed At 1300N
8.46 J
9.54 J
Energy Absorbed At 2050N
12.50 J
13.86 J
Heel Firmness
6.7
7.9
Heel Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 550N
36.3 N/mm
45.9 N/mm
Firmness At 1100N
49.0 N/mm
54.1 N/mm
Firmness At 1900N
71.4 N/mm
74.7 N/mm
Forefoot Firmness
7.6
6.5
Forefoot Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 800N
54.0 N/mm
50.8 N/mm
Firmness At 1300N
71.2 N/mm
66.5 N/mm
Firmness At 2050N
99 N/mm
92 N/mm
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
7.4
8.1
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 10km
8.03 J
8.93 J
Energy Absorbed At 20km
7.89 J
8.76 J
Energy Absorbed At 30km
7.79 J
8.65 J
Energy Absorbed At 40km
7.71 J
8.57 J
Rocker Stiffness
8.7
8.1
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Video
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Force To Flatten The Rocker
151 N
125 N
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
7.3
7.7
Forefoot Bending Video
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
66.6%
69.5%
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
8.8
6.8
Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Bending Resistance
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
29.3 N/mm
13.7 N/mm
Forefoot Bending Force
392 N
236 N
Heel Compression Depth
6.7
5.9
Heel Compression Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Heel Compression At 550N
15.2 mm
12.0 mm
Heel Compression At 1100N
22.5 mm
20.3 mm
Heel Compression At 1900N
26.6 mm
25.4 mm
Forefoot Compression Depth
6.3
6.7
Forefoot Compression Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Compression At 800N
14.8 mm
15.7 mm
Forefoot Compression At 1300N
18.2 mm
19.6 mm
Forefoot Compression At 2050N
20.7 mm
22.2 mm
To access
Become a member
unlimited full product reviews,
product prices, and
other exclusive site features
ANTA C202 7
ASICS YOGIRI SPEED
Comments
ANTA C202 7 vs ASICS YOGIRI SPEED: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.