Products
Tested using Methodology v0.12
Updated Jul 02, 2026 03:03 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Tested using Methodology v0.14
Updated Sep 17, 2026 05:11 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Heel Stack Height
36.2 mm
Weight
282.3 g (9.96 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
10.9 mm
Plate
None
Heel Stack Height
41.6 mm
Weight
273.3 g (9.64 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
9.9 mm
Plate
None
Our Verdict
Brooks Ghost 17
HOKA Clifton 10
The HOKA Clifton 10 and the Brooks Ghost 17 are two everyday trainers that garner broad appeal, each taking a different route. The HOKA is built on the brand's trademark plush cushioning and high-stack platform. This does come at the expense of stability, and the Brooks is a safer bet for any runners who feel unsteady in their stride. The heel in the HOKA runs much narrower, so the fit of the Brooks will likely be more comfortable for runners with wider feet.
Variants
- Ghost 17 (Acid Lime/Navy/White - (Men - US 9))
- Ghost 17 (Apricot/Grey/Pink - (Women - US 7))
- Clifton 10 (Black/Black - (Men - US 9))
- Clifton 10 (Black/Black - (Women - US 7))
Main Differences for
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Threshold
Half/Full Marathon Racing
5.0
6.6
Forefoot Stack Height
25.3 mm
31.7 mm
Heel Stack Height
36.2 mm
41.6 mm
Forefoot Compression Energy Return
2.5
4.4
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
4.9
5.9
Weight
5.1
5.5
Full Comparison
Design
Weight
5.1
5.5
Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Weight
282.3 g (9.96 oz)
273.3 g (9.64 oz)
Stack Heights
Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Stack Height
36.2 mm
41.6 mm
Forefoot Stack Height
25.3 mm
31.7 mm
Heel-To-Toe Drop
10.9 mm
9.9 mm
Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
10.0 mm
8.0 mm
External Shape
3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Outsole Heel Width
91 mm (3.6")
94 mm (3.7")
Outsole Arch Width
75 mm (3.0")
85 mm (3.3")
Outsole Forefoot Width
112 mm (4.4")
113 mm (4.4")
Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
2.51
2.26
Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
4.43
3.56
Internal Shape
3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Internal Length
279 mm (11.0")
280 mm (11.0")
Internal Heel Width
67 mm (2.6")
62 mm (2.4")
Internal Forefoot Width
91 mm (3.6")
98 mm (3.9")
Wide Sizing Available
Yes
Yes
Forefoot Fit: Width
9.9
9.4
Forefoot Width Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation
0.1 mm (0.004")
2.8 mm (0.108")
Toe TTS Deviation
-0.8 mm (-0.032")
-1.2 mm (-0.048")
Forefoot Fit: Height
7.7
7.0
Forefoot Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe TTS Deviation
-2.7 mm (-0.108")
-3.6 mm (-0.143")
Arch Fit: Width
6.1
10
Arch Fit Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Arch Width TTS Deviation
-5.7 mm (-0.224")
0.5 mm (0.020")
Length Fit
10
10
Toe Clearance Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Rocker Geometry
6.9
8.4
Heel Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Spring
18 mm (0.7")
30 mm (1.2")
Heel Apex Position
15.3%
19.9%
Heel Rocker Angle
21.8°
27.3°
Forefoot Rocker Geometry
5.7
7.3
Forefoot Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe Spring
40 mm (1.6")
50 mm (2.0")
Toe Apex Position
66.1%
65.8%
Forefoot Rocker Angle
21.8°
26.6°
Foam
Primary Foam Picture
Secondary Foam Picture
Primary Foam Name
N/A
Primary Foam Type
EVA
Secondary Foam Name
N/A
Secondary Foam Type
No Secondary Foam
Laces
Laces Picture
Lace Type
Flat
Width
5.0 mm (0.2")
Thickness
1.7 mm (0.1")
Stretch
11.0%
Other Features
Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Tongue Gusset Type
Non-gusseted
Semi-gusseted
Plate
None
None
Performance
Heel Compression Energy Return
1.5
4.4
Heel Compression Video
Heel Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Heel Energy Return
66.5%
71.1%
Forefoot Compression Energy Return
2.5
4.4
Forefoot Compression Video
Forefoot Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Energy Return
68.8%
71.1%
Heel Cushioning
7.0
8.4
Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 550N
2.79 J
3.84 J
Energy Absorbed At 1100N
8.76 J
10.26 J
Energy Absorbed At 1900N
16.23 J
17.10 J
Forefoot Cushioning
5.4
7.8
Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 800N
3.32 J
4.82 J
Energy Absorbed At 1300N
5.84 J
8.42 J
Energy Absorbed At 2050N
8.94 J
12.38 J
Heel Firmness
8.9
7.1
Heel Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 550N
56.6 N/mm
39.9 N/mm
Firmness At 1100N
64.0 N/mm
50.1 N/mm
Firmness At 1900N
85.0 N/mm
71.1 N/mm
Forefoot Firmness
9.7
8.1
Forefoot Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 800N
85.3 N/mm
57.3 N/mm
Firmness At 1300N
109.8 N/mm
74.4 N/mm
Firmness At 2050N
149 N/mm
103 N/mm
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
4.9
5.9
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 10km
5.41 J
6.70 J
Energy Absorbed At 20km
5.28 J
6.41 J
Energy Absorbed At 30km
5.23 J
6.20 J
Energy Absorbed At 40km
5.21 J
6.04 J
Rocker Stiffness
6.3
5.9
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Video
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Force To Flatten The Rocker
68 N
60 N
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
4.3
5.1
Forefoot Bending Video
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
54.3%
57.3%
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
6.7
6.9
Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Bending Resistance
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
7.1 N/mm
11.5 N/mm
Forefoot Bending Force
348 N
268 N
To access
Become a member
unlimited full product reviews,
product prices, and
other exclusive site features
Brooks Ghost 17
HOKA Clifton 10
Comments
Brooks Ghost 17 vs HOKA Clifton 10: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.