Brooks Hyperion Max 2 vs PUMA Deviate NITRO 3

Which Running Shoe Is Better?

Products

Brooks Hyperion Max 2
PUMA Deviate NITRO 3

Tested using Methodology v0.8.2

Updated Nov 03, 2025 09:36 PM

SEE PRICE
Amazon.com

Tested using Methodology v0.9

Updated Nov 24, 2025 04:29 PM

SEE PRICE
PUMA

Our Verdict

Brooks Hyperion Max 2

PUMA Deviate NITRO 3

The PUMA Deviate NITRO 3 and Brooks Hyperion Max 2 are both plated super trainers built to handle faster training sessions. The Puma has a carbon plate, which is superior for racing short distances. This plate offers a stiffer, more aggressive feel. The Hyperion Max 2, meanwhile, uses a nylon plate—less aggressive but paired with a midsole that provides greater energy return, offering a bouncier ride.

0 

Variants

  • Hyperion Max 2 (Black/Gold/Pink - (Men - US 9))
  • Hyperion Max 2 (Cobalt/Green Gecko/Limpett - (Men - US 9))
  • Deviate NITRO 3 (Black/Sun Stream - (Men - US 9))
  • Deviate NITRO 3 (Black/Sunset Glow/Sun Stream - (Women - US 7))
Read more

Main Differences for
Marathon Racing

Threshold 

0.10

Marathon Racing 
 

7.1
7.3

Heel Stack Height 
 

36.7 mm
42.3 mm

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

7.3
6.7

Plate 
 

Plastic
Carbon Fiber

Full Comparison

Design

Weight  

5.9
5.9

Right Shoe Weight Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Brooks Hyperion Max 2 Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
PUMA Deviate NITRO 3 Right Shoe Weight Photo

Left Shoe Weight Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Brooks Hyperion Max 2 Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
PUMA Deviate NITRO 3 Left Shoe Weight Photo

Weight 
 

263.7 g (9.30 oz)
262.1 g (9.25 oz)
Show Text 

Stack Heights 
 

Stack Height Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Brooks Hyperion Max 2 Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
PUMA Deviate NITRO 3 Stack Height Photo

Heel Stack Height 
 

36.7 mm
42.3 mm

Forefoot Stack Height 
 

29.8 mm
31.3 mm

Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

6.9 mm
11.0 mm

Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

6.0 mm
10.0 mm

External Shape 
 

3D Model Full Shoe  

Preview 3D
Brooks Hyperion Max 2 3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
PUMA Deviate NITRO 3 3D Model Full Shoe

Outsole Heel Width 
 

82 mm (3.2")
83 mm (3.3")

Outsole Arch Width 
 

72 mm (2.8")
58 mm (2.3")

Outsole Forefoot Width 
 

112 mm (4.4")
107 mm (4.2")

Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

2.23
1.96

Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

3.76
3.42

Internal Shape 
 

3D Model Internal  

Preview 3D
Brooks Hyperion Max 2 3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
PUMA Deviate NITRO 3 3D Model Internal

Internal Length 
 

273 mm (10.7")
275 mm (10.8")

Internal Heel Width 
 

61 mm (2.4")
60 mm (2.4")

Internal Forefoot Width 
 

91 mm (3.6")
91 mm (3.6")

Wide Sizing Available 
 

No
Yes

Other Features  

Other Features Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Brooks Hyperion Max 2 Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
PUMA Deviate NITRO 3 Other Features Photo

Tongue Gusset Type 
 

Semi-gusseted
Semi-gusseted

Plate 
 

Plastic
Carbon Fiber
Performance

Heel Energy Return 
 

6.7
5.8

Heel Compression Video  

Heel Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
Brooks Hyperion Max 2 Heel Energy Return
 Preview Graph
PUMA Deviate NITRO 3 Heel Energy Return

Heel Energy Return 
 

75.2%
73.1%
Show Text 

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

7.3
6.7

Forefoot Compression Video  

Forefoot Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
Brooks Hyperion Max 2 Forefoot Energy Return
 Preview Graph
PUMA Deviate NITRO 3 Forefoot Energy Return

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

77.1%
75.0%
Show Text 

Heel Cushioning 
 

7.2
7.3

Heel Cushioning Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Brooks Hyperion Max 2 Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
PUMA Deviate NITRO 3 Heel Cushioning Picture

Heel Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
Brooks Hyperion Max 2 Heel Cushioning
 Preview Graph
PUMA Deviate NITRO 3 Heel Cushioning

Energy Absorbed At 550N 
 

3.32 J
3.30 J

Energy Absorbed At 1100N 
 

9.04 J
8.83 J

Energy Absorbed At 1900N 
 

15.09 J
15.65 J
Show Text 

Forefoot Cushioning 
 

7.1
6.4

Forefoot Cushioning Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Brooks Hyperion Max 2 Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
PUMA Deviate NITRO 3 Forefoot Cushioning Picture

Forefoot Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
Brooks Hyperion Max 2 Forefoot Cushioning
 Preview Graph
PUMA Deviate NITRO 3 Forefoot Cushioning

Energy Absorbed At 800N 
 

4.17 J
3.90 J

Energy Absorbed At 1300N 
 

7.60 J
6.80 J

Energy Absorbed At 2050N 
 

11.44 J
10.08 J
Show Text 

Heel Firmness 
 

5.8
5.8

Heel Firmness  

 Preview Graph
Brooks Hyperion Max 2 Heel Firmness
 Preview Graph
PUMA Deviate NITRO 3 Heel Firmness

Firmness At 550N 
 

50.4 N/mm
58.3 N/mm

Firmness At 1100N 
 

124.4 N/mm
111.8 N/mm

Firmness At 1900N 
 

270.8 N/mm
227.5 N/mm
Show Text 

Forefoot Firmness 
 

8.0
8.6

Forefoot Firmness  

 Preview Graph
Brooks Hyperion Max 2 Forefoot Firmness
 Preview Graph
PUMA Deviate NITRO 3 Forefoot Firmness

Firmness At 800N 
 

109.3 N/mm
126.6 N/mm

Firmness At 1300N 
 

211.0 N/mm
251.3 N/mm

Firmness At 2050N 
 

417.1 N/mm
479.0 N/mm
Show Text 

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning 
 

5.7

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
PUMA Deviate NITRO 3 Forefoot Long Run Cushioning

Energy Absorbed At 10km 
 

6.40 J

Energy Absorbed At 20km 
 

6.19 J

Energy Absorbed At 30km 
 

6.06 J

Energy Absorbed At 40km 
 

5.95 J

Brooks Hyperion Max 2

PUMA Deviate NITRO 3

Comments

  1. Comparison

Brooks Hyperion Max 2 vs PUMA Deviate NITRO 3: Main Discussion

What do you think of these products? Let us know below.


Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Insiders have direct access to buying advice on our insider forum.

PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
No comments yet, refresh to see new ones