Products
Tested using Methodology v0.12
Updated Jun 16, 2026 08:40 PM
SEE PRICE
Hoka.com
Tested using Methodology v0.13
Updated Jun 30, 2026 08:25 PM
SEE PRICE
DicksSportingGoods.com
Weight
208.4 g (7.35 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
8.6 mm
Plate
Carbon Fiber
Weight
200.5 g (7.07 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
8.9 mm
Plate
Carbon Fiber
Our Verdict
HOKA Rocket X 3
New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Elite v5
The New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Elite v5 and HOKA Rocket X 3 are two race shoes that deliver some high-performance elements while maintaining their respective brand's comfort-forward designs. The shoes are very similar in weight and energy return, but the HOKA shoe has better cushioning, especially over long distances.
Variants
- Rocket X 3 (White/Black - (Men - US 9))
- Rocket X 3 (White/Black - (Women - US 7))
- FuelCell SuperComp Elite v5 (Urgent Red/White/Black - (Men - US 9))
- FuelCell SuperComp Elite v5 (Urgent Red/White/Black - (Women - US 7))
Main Differences for
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Threshold
Half/Full Marathon Racing
8.0
8.0
Full Comparison
Design
Weight
7.9
8.1
Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Weight
208.4 g (7.35 oz)
200.5 g (7.07 oz)
Stack Heights
Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Stack Height
40.3 mm
39.4 mm
Forefoot Stack Height
31.7 mm
30.5 mm
Heel-To-Toe Drop
8.6 mm
8.9 mm
Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
7.0 mm
8.0 mm
External Shape
3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Outsole Heel Width
76 mm (3.0")
75 mm (3.0")
Outsole Arch Width
69 mm (2.7")
55 mm (2.2")
Outsole Forefoot Width
107 mm (4.2")
106 mm (4.2")
Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
1.89
1.90
Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
3.38
3.48
Internal Shape
3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Internal Length
274 mm (10.8")
276 mm (10.9")
Internal Heel Width
65 mm (2.6")
64 mm (2.5")
Internal Forefoot Width
94 mm (3.7")
90 mm (3.5")
Wide Sizing Available
No
Yes
Forefoot Fit: Width
8.5
9.2
Forefoot Width Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation
-1.8 mm (-0.069")
-1.2 mm (-0.045")
Toe TTS Deviation
-4.2 mm (-0.165")
-2.7 mm (-0.105")
Forefoot Fit: Height
8.0
8.5
Forefoot Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe TTS Deviation
-2.5 mm (-0.099")
-2.1 mm (-0.081")
Arch Fit: Width
8.2
5.4
Arch Fit Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Arch Width TTS Deviation
-3.0 mm (-0.120")
-6.5 mm (-0.256")
Length Fit
10
10
Toe Clearance Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Rocker Geometry
6.9
8.2
Heel Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Spring
18 mm (0.7")
28 mm (1.1")
Heel Apex Position
20.4%
17.5%
Heel Rocker Angle
17.8°
29.2°
Forefoot Rocker Geometry
7.9
7.7
Forefoot Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe Spring
55 mm (2.2")
54 mm (2.1")
Toe Apex Position
60.0%
63.5%
Forefoot Rocker Angle
26.6°
27.2°
Foam
Primary Foam Picture
Secondary Foam Picture
Primary Foam Name
FuelCell
Primary Foam Type
PEBA
Secondary Foam Name
N/A
Secondary Foam Type
N/A
Other Features
Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Tongue Gusset Type
Non-gusseted
Semi-gusseted
Plate
Carbon Fiber
Carbon Fiber
Performance
Heel Compression Energy Return
8.5
8.6
Heel Compression Video
Heel Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Heel Energy Return
83.7%
84.8%
Forefoot Compression Energy Return
8.5
8.6
Forefoot Compression Video
Forefoot Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Energy Return
83.8%
84.6%
Heel Cushioning
8.3
7.2
Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 550N
4.40 J
3.89 J
Energy Absorbed At 1100N
10.16 J
8.66 J
Energy Absorbed At 1900N
15.84 J
13.82 J
Forefoot Cushioning
7.9
7.9
Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 800N
5.14 J
5.08 J
Energy Absorbed At 1300N
8.44 J
8.46 J
Energy Absorbed At 2050N
12.09 J
12.15 J
Heel Firmness
5.6
6.9
Heel Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 550N
31.7 N/mm
34.4 N/mm
Firmness At 1100N
44.5 N/mm
49.9 N/mm
Firmness At 1900N
66.3 N/mm
74.1 N/mm
Forefoot Firmness
6.6
6.6
Forefoot Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 800N
49.6 N/mm
49.6 N/mm
Firmness At 1300N
67.1 N/mm
66.9 N/mm
Firmness At 2050N
95 N/mm
94 N/mm
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
7.6
7.2
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 10km
8.27 J
7.78 J
Energy Absorbed At 20km
8.16 J
7.65 J
Energy Absorbed At 30km
8.08 J
7.56 J
Energy Absorbed At 40km
8.02 J
7.49 J
Rocker Stiffness
8.4
7.8
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Video
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Force To Flatten The Rocker
137 N
110 N
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
7.8
8.6
Forefoot Bending Video
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
70.5%
76.3%
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
8.3
7.9
Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Bending Resistance
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
22.9 N/mm
19.9 N/mm
Forefoot Bending Force
319 N
290 N
To access
Become a member
unlimited full product reviews,
product prices, and
other exclusive site features
HOKA Rocket X 3
New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Elite v5
Comments
HOKA Rocket X 3 vs New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Elite v5: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.