Kiprun KS900 2 vs HOKA Clifton 10

Which Running Shoe Is Better?

Products

Kiprun KS900 2
HOKA Clifton 10

Tested using Methodology v0.9

Updated Jan 12, 2026 07:43 PM

Amazon.com

Tested using Methodology v0.9

Updated Jan 12, 2026 07:48 PM

SEE PRICE
Hoka.com

Our Verdict

Kiprun KS900 2

HOKA Clifton 10

The Kiprun KS900 2 and the HOKA Clifton 10 are both high-stack daily trainers with EVA-based midsoles that prioritize impact absorption over bounce, but they approach that goal a bit differently. The Clifton 10 delivers a softer, more cushioned ride overall, with a lighter build and a smoother step-in feel that makes it more immediately comfortable for easy, short daily runs. The KS900 2, on the other hand, feels firmer and simpler underfoot, with a more basic EVA midsole that feels predictable and tends to hold its cushioning character a bit better as distances stretch out. 

0 

Variants

  • KS900 2 (Smoked Black/Fluo Pale Pink/Snow White - (Women - US 7))
  • KS900 2 (Steel Blue/Magnolia/Fluo Pale Orange - (Men - US 9))
  • Clifton 10 (Black/Black - (Men - US 9))
  • Clifton 10 (Black/Black - (Women - US 7))

Main Differences for
Marathon Racing

Threshold 

0.10

Marathon Racing 
 

5.4
6.4

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

2.0
4.4

Heel Energy Return 
 

1.1
4.4

Weight  

4.6
5.5

Full Comparison

Design

Weight  

4.6
5.5

Right Shoe Weight Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Kiprun KS900 2 Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
HOKA Clifton 10 Right Shoe Weight Photo

Left Shoe Weight Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Kiprun KS900 2 Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
HOKA Clifton 10 Left Shoe Weight Photo

Weight 
 

294.6 g (10.39 oz)
273.3 g (9.64 oz)
Show Text 

Stack Heights 
 

Stack Height Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Kiprun KS900 2 Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
HOKA Clifton 10 Stack Height Photo

Heel Stack Height 
 

40.2 mm
41.6 mm

Forefoot Stack Height 
 

31.3 mm
31.7 mm

Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

8.1 mm
9.9 mm

Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

6.0 mm
8.0 mm
Show Text 

External Shape 
 

3D Model Full Shoe  

Preview 3D
Kiprun KS900 2 3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
HOKA Clifton 10 3D Model Full Shoe

Outsole Heel Width 
 

95 mm (3.7")
94 mm (3.7")

Outsole Arch Width 
 

76 mm (3.0")
85 mm (3.3")

Outsole Forefoot Width 
 

114 mm (4.5")
113 mm (4.4")

Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

2.36
2.26

Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

3.64
3.56
Show Text 

Internal Shape 
 

3D Model Internal  

Preview 3D
Kiprun KS900 2 3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
HOKA Clifton 10 3D Model Internal

Internal Length 
 

272 mm (10.7")
280 mm (11.0")

Internal Heel Width 
 

58 mm (2.3")
62 mm (2.4")

Internal Forefoot Width 
 

90 mm (3.5")
98 mm (3.9")

Wide Sizing Available 
 

No
Yes
Show Text 

Other Features  

Other Features Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Kiprun KS900 2 Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
HOKA Clifton 10 Other Features Photo

Tongue Gusset Type 
 

Semi-gusseted
Semi-gusseted

Plate 
 

None
None
Performance

Heel Energy Return 
 

1.1
4.4

Heel Compression Video  

Heel Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
Kiprun KS900 2 Heel Energy Return
 Preview Graph
HOKA Clifton 10 Heel Energy Return

Heel Energy Return 
 

65.0%
71.1%
Show Text 

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

2.0
4.4

Forefoot Compression Video  

Forefoot Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
Kiprun KS900 2 Forefoot Energy Return
 Preview Graph
HOKA Clifton 10 Forefoot Energy Return

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

67.9%
71.1%
Show Text 

Heel Cushioning 
 

6.3
8.4

Heel Cushioning Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Kiprun KS900 2 Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
HOKA Clifton 10 Heel Cushioning Picture

Heel Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
Kiprun KS900 2 Heel Cushioning
 Preview Graph
HOKA Clifton 10 Heel Cushioning

Energy Absorbed At 550N 
 

2.38 J
3.84 J

Energy Absorbed At 1100N 
 

8.19 J
10.26 J

Energy Absorbed At 1900N 
 

14.98 J
17.10 J
Show Text 

Forefoot Cushioning 
 

6.4
7.8

Forefoot Cushioning Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Kiprun KS900 2 Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
HOKA Clifton 10 Forefoot Cushioning Picture

Forefoot Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
Kiprun KS900 2 Forefoot Cushioning
 Preview Graph
HOKA Clifton 10 Forefoot Cushioning

Energy Absorbed At 800N 
 

3.74 J
4.82 J

Energy Absorbed At 1300N 
 

6.89 J
8.42 J

Energy Absorbed At 2050N 
 

10.47 J
12.38 J
Show Text 

Heel Firmness 
 

5.9
4.9

Heel Firmness  

 Preview Graph
Kiprun KS900 2 Heel Firmness
 Preview Graph
HOKA Clifton 10 Heel Firmness

Firmness At 550N 
 

63.6 N/mm
44.1 N/mm

Firmness At 1100N 
 

105.9 N/mm
107.8 N/mm

Firmness At 1900N 
 

232.5 N/mm
238.5 N/mm
Show Text 

Forefoot Firmness 
 

8.3
7.8

Forefoot Firmness  

 Preview Graph
Kiprun KS900 2 Forefoot Firmness
 Preview Graph
HOKA Clifton 10 Forefoot Firmness

Firmness At 800N 
 

119.5 N/mm
101.8 N/mm

Firmness At 1300N 
 

228.2 N/mm
199.9 N/mm

Firmness At 2050N 
 

442.5 N/mm
397.1 N/mm
Show Text 

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning 
 

6.1
5.9

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
Kiprun KS900 2 Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
 Preview Graph
HOKA Clifton 10 Forefoot Long Run Cushioning

Energy Absorbed At 10km 
 

6.62 J
6.70 J

Energy Absorbed At 20km 
 

6.49 J
6.41 J

Energy Absorbed At 30km 
 

6.40 J
6.20 J

Energy Absorbed At 40km 
 

6.36 J
6.04 J
Show Text 

Kiprun KS900 2

HOKA Clifton 10

Comments

  1. Comparison

Kiprun KS900 2 vs HOKA Clifton 10: Main Discussion

What do you think of these products? Let us know below.


Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Insiders have direct access to buying advice on our insider forum.

PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
No comments yet, refresh to see new ones