Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra vs Dynafish Xiaonian

Which Running Shoe Is Better?

Products

Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra
Dynafish Xiaonian

Tested using Methodology v0.15

Updated Sep 15, 2026 06:22 PM

SEE PRICE
Amazon

Tested using Methodology v0.15

Updated Sep 03, 2026 03:46 PM

DicksSportingGoods.com
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra Picture

Track

Dynafish Xiaonian Picture

Track

  1. Recommended in 1 article:
  2. Cushioned
  1. Recommended in 1 article:
  2. Long Distance

Our Verdict

Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra

Dynafish Xiaonian

The Dynafish Xiaonian is better than the Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra. It has a more stable platform and works better across regular mileage. It is lightweight, which helps it feel less demanding over repeated training miles. The Red Hare 9 Ultra absorbs more impact, making it more comfortable for easy miles. It has more bounce, adding some life to everyday running.

0 

Variants

  • Red Hare 9 Ultra (Black - (Women - US 7))
  • Red Hare 9 Ultra (Champagne White - (Women - US 7))
  • Xiaonian (Black - (Men - US 9))
  • Xiaonian (Burning Sun - (Women - US 7))

Main Differences for
Half/Full Marathon Racing

Threshold 

0.10

Half/Full Marathon Racing 
 

8.0
8.4

Weight  

6.9
8.4

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning 
 

9.3
8.5

Full Comparison

Design

Weight  

6.9
8.4

Right Shoe Weight Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Right Shoe Weight Photo

Left Shoe Weight Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Left Shoe Weight Photo

Weight 
 

237.2 g (8.37 oz)
192.5 g (6.79 oz)

Stack Heights 
 

Stack Height Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Stack Height Photo

Heel Stack Height 
 

46.2 mm
40.6 mm

Forefoot Stack Height 
 

37.1 mm
31.2 mm

Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

9.1 mm
9.4 mm

Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

N/A
7.0 mm

External Shape 
 

3D Model Full Shoe  

Preview 3D
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra 3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
Dynafish Xiaonian 3D Model Full Shoe

Outsole Heel Width 
 

93 mm (3.7")
97 mm (3.8")

Outsole Arch Width 
 

81 mm (3.2")
80 mm (3.1")

Outsole Forefoot Width 
 

117 mm (4.6")
118 mm (4.7")

Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

2.01
2.39

Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

3.15
3.78

Internal Shape 
 

3D Model Internal  

Preview 3D
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra 3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
Dynafish Xiaonian 3D Model Internal

Internal Length 
 

273 mm (10.7")
275 mm (10.8")

Internal Heel Width 
 

56 mm (2.2")
58 mm (2.3")

Internal Forefoot Width 
 

92 mm (3.6")
94 mm (3.7")

Wide Sizing Available 
 

No
No

Forefoot Fit: Width 
 

9.2
8.9

Forefoot Width Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra Forefoot Width Photo
Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Forefoot Width Photo

Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation 
 

3.4 mm (0.133")
4.1 mm (0.160")

Toe TTS Deviation 
 

-0.9 mm (-0.037")
-1.4 mm (-0.056")

Forefoot Fit: Height 
 

6.0
8.2

Forefoot Height Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra Forefoot Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Forefoot Height Photo

Toe TTS Deviation 
 

-4.8 mm (-0.189")
-2.3 mm (-0.092")

Arch Fit: Width 
 

0.0
9.8

Arch Fit Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra Arch Fit Photo
Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Arch Fit Photo

Arch Width TTS Deviation 
 

-16.7 mm (-0.656")
-0.6 mm (-0.023")

Length Fit 
 

10
10

Toe Clearance Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra Toe Clearance Photo
Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Toe Clearance Photo

Heel Rocker Geometry 
 

6.6
6.6

Heel Rocker Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra Heel Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Heel Rocker Photo

Heel Spring 
 

22 mm (0.9")
21 mm (0.8")

Heel Apex Position 
 

30.5%
29.8%

Heel Rocker Angle 
 

13.7°
13.7°

Forefoot Rocker Geometry 
 

7.3
8.3

Forefoot Rocker Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra Forefoot Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Forefoot Rocker Photo

Toe Spring 
 

50 mm (2.0")
62 mm (2.4")

Toe Apex Position 
 

59.3%
58.5%

Forefoot Rocker Angle 
 

22.6°
27.3°

Foam 
 

Primary Foam Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra Primary Foam Picture
Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Primary Foam Picture

Secondary Foam Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra Secondary Foam Picture
Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Secondary Foam Picture

Primary Foam Name 
 

N/A

Primary Foam Name 
 

Super BOOM Capsule

Primary Foam Type 
 

PEBA
TPEE

Secondary Foam Name 
 

N/A

Secondary Foam Name 
 

Super BOOM

Secondary Foam Type 
 

PEBA
No Secondary Foam

Laces 
 

Laces Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra Laces Picture
Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Laces Picture

Lace Type 
 

Flat
Flat

Width 
 

5.0 mm (0.2")
4.0 mm (0.2")

Thickness 
 

1.3 mm (0.1")
1.5 mm (0.1")

Stretch 
 

8.5%
12.5%

Other Features  

Other Features Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Other Features Photo

Tongue Gusset Type 
 

Semi-gusseted
Semi-gusseted

Plate 
 

Plastic Shank
None
Performance

Heel Compression Energy Return 
 

8.4
8.0

Heel Compression Video  

Heel Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra Heel Energy Return
 Preview Graph
Dynafish Xiaonian Heel Energy Return

Heel Energy Return 
 

83.0%
80.8%

Forefoot Compression Energy Return 
 

8.5
8.6

Forefoot Compression Video  

Forefoot Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra Forefoot Energy Return
 Preview Graph
Dynafish Xiaonian Forefoot Energy Return

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

83.9%
84.3%

Heel Cushioning 
 

9.4
8.8

Heel Cushioning Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Heel Cushioning Picture

Heel Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra Heel Cushioning
 Preview Graph
Dynafish Xiaonian Heel Cushioning

Energy Absorbed At 550N 
 

4.25 J
4.08 J

Energy Absorbed At 1100N 
 

12.56 J
11.05 J

Energy Absorbed At 1900N 
 

21.97 J
18.34 J

Forefoot Cushioning 
 

9.5
9.1

Forefoot Cushioning Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Forefoot Cushioning Picture

Forefoot Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra Forefoot Cushioning
 Preview Graph
Dynafish Xiaonian Forefoot Cushioning

Energy Absorbed At 800N 
 

6.51 J
5.83 J

Energy Absorbed At 1300N 
 

11.59 J
10.36 J

Energy Absorbed At 2050N 
 

17.07 J
15.20 J

Heel Firmness 
 

5.2
5.9

Heel Firmness Graph  

 Preview Graph
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra Heel Firmness Graph
 Preview Graph
Dynafish Xiaonian Heel Firmness Graph

Firmness At 550N 
 

36.4 N/mm
36.7 N/mm

Firmness At 1100N 
 

43.0 N/mm
46.1 N/mm

Firmness At 1900N 
 

59.2 N/mm
65.6 N/mm

Forefoot Firmness 
 

4.1
5.8

Forefoot Firmness Graph  

 Preview Graph
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra Forefoot Firmness Graph
 Preview Graph
Dynafish Xiaonian Forefoot Firmness Graph

Firmness At 800N 
 

42.5 N/mm
49.6 N/mm

Firmness At 1300N 
 

54.6 N/mm
63.2 N/mm

Firmness At 2050N 
 

75 N/mm
87 N/mm

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning 
 

9.3
8.5

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
 Preview Graph
Dynafish Xiaonian Forefoot Long Run Cushioning

Energy Absorbed At 10km 
 

11.07 J
9.52 J

Energy Absorbed At 20km 
 

10.79 J
9.29 J

Energy Absorbed At 30km 
 

10.63 J
9.15 J

Energy Absorbed At 40km 
 

10.49 J
9.04 J

Rocker Stiffness 
 

5.8
7.5

Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Video  

Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph  

 Preview Graph
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph
 Preview Graph
Dynafish Xiaonian Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph

Force To Flatten The Rocker 
 

58 N
101 N

Forefoot Bending Energy Return 
 

8.5
7.9

Forefoot Bending Video  

Forefoot Bending Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra Forefoot Bending Energy Return
 Preview Graph
Dynafish Xiaonian Forefoot Bending Energy Return

Forefoot Bending Energy Return 
 

76.3%
70.5%

Forefoot Bending Stiffness 
 

7.0
5.9

Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture
Compare High-Res
Dynafish Xiaonian Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture

Forefoot Bending Resistance  

 Preview Graph
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra Forefoot Bending Resistance
 Preview Graph
Dynafish Xiaonian Forefoot Bending Resistance

Forefoot Bending Stiffness 
 

14.2 N/mm
6.9 N/mm

Forefoot Bending Force 
 

244 N
243 N

Heel Compression Depth 
 

7.5
7.1

Heel Compression Graph  

 Preview Graph
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra Heel Compression Graph
 Preview Graph
Dynafish Xiaonian Heel Compression Graph

Heel Compression At 550N 
 

15.1 mm
15.0 mm

Heel Compression At 1100N 
 

25.6 mm
23.9 mm

Heel Compression At 1900N 
 

32.1 mm
28.9 mm

Forefoot Compression Depth 
 

8.0
7.0

Forefoot Compression Graph  

 Preview Graph
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra Forefoot Compression Graph
 Preview Graph
Dynafish Xiaonian Forefoot Compression Graph

Forefoot Compression At 800N 
 

18.8 mm
16.1 mm

Forefoot Compression At 1300N 
 

23.8 mm
20.6 mm

Forefoot Compression At 2050N 
 

27.2 mm
23.6 mm

Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra

Dynafish Xiaonian

Comments

  1. Comparison

Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra vs Dynafish Xiaonian: Main Discussion

What do you think of these products? Let us know below.


Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.

PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
No comments yet, refresh to see new ones