Mizuno Neo Vista 2 vs PUMA MagMax NITRO 2

Which Running Shoe Is Better?

Products

Mizuno Neo Vista 2
PUMA MagMax NITRO 2

Tested using Methodology v0.9

Updated Jan 09, 2026 08:28 PM

SEE PRICE
Amazon.com

Tested using Methodology v0.9

Updated Jan 14, 2026 03:35 PM

SEE PRICE
PUMA
  1. Recommended in 3 articles:
  2. Running Shoes
  3. Women
  4. For Men

Our Verdict

Mizuno Neo Vista 2

PUMA MagMax NITRO 2

The PUMA MagMax NITRO 2 and the Mizuno Neo Vista 2 are two max-cushioned running shoes that offer dramatically different cruising experiences. The Mizuno shoe sits 5 mm higher and uses a plastic plate to stabilise the mammoth stack of foam. The ride of the Neo Vista 2 is very bouncy but can start to feel wobbly if you try to pick up the pace. The MagMax 2 doesn't have a plate, but instead stabilizes the tall stack with a much wider platform that adds that extra bit of security when landing. Both are best suited to easy paces, although both have enough cushioning to comfortably get through long runs.

0 

Variants

  • Neo Vista 2 (Baritone Blue/Frozen Emerald - (Men - US 9))
  • Neo Vista 2 (Baritone Blue/Striking Coral - (Women - US 7))
  • MagMax NITRO 2 (Silver Mist/Apple Spritz - (Women - US 7))
  • MagMax NITRO 2 (Black/White - (Women - US 7))

Main Differences for
Marathon Racing

Threshold 

0.10

Marathon Racing 
 

7.2
6.0

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

5.5
2.6

Heel Energy Return 
 

6.0
1.6

Plate 
 

Plastic
None

Full Comparison

Design

Weight  

5.9
5.7

Right Shoe Weight Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Mizuno Neo Vista 2 Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
PUMA MagMax NITRO 2 Right Shoe Weight Photo

Left Shoe Weight Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Mizuno Neo Vista 2 Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
PUMA MagMax NITRO 2 Left Shoe Weight Photo

Weight 
 

263.4 g (9.29 oz)
267.7 g (9.44 oz)
Show Text 

Stack Heights 
 

Stack Height Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Mizuno Neo Vista 2 Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
PUMA MagMax NITRO 2 Stack Height Photo

Heel Stack Height 
 

50.1 mm
44.9 mm

Forefoot Stack Height 
 

40.3 mm
36.1 mm

Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

9.8 mm
8.8 mm

Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

8.0 mm
8.0 mm
Show Text 

External Shape 
 

3D Model Full Shoe  

Preview 3D
Mizuno Neo Vista 2 3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
PUMA MagMax NITRO 2 3D Model Full Shoe

Outsole Heel Width 
 

95 mm (3.8")
103 mm (4.0")

Outsole Arch Width 
 

88 mm (3.5")
81 mm (3.2")

Outsole Forefoot Width 
 

117 mm (4.6")
123 mm (4.8")

Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

1.89
2.29

Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

2.90
3.40
Show Text 

Internal Shape 
 

3D Model Internal  

Preview 3D
Mizuno Neo Vista 2 3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
PUMA MagMax NITRO 2 3D Model Internal

Internal Length 
 

281 mm (11.1")
281 mm (11.1")

Internal Heel Width 
 

62 mm (2.4")
67 mm (2.6")

Internal Forefoot Width 
 

95 mm (3.7")
94 mm (3.7")

Wide Sizing Available 
 

No
No

Other Features  

Other Features Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Mizuno Neo Vista 2 Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
PUMA MagMax NITRO 2 Other Features Photo

Tongue Gusset Type 
 

Non-gusseted
Fully-gusseted

Plate 
 

Plastic
None
Performance

Heel Energy Return 
 

6.0
1.6

Heel Compression Video  

Heel Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
Mizuno Neo Vista 2 Heel Energy Return
 Preview Graph
PUMA MagMax NITRO 2 Heel Energy Return

Heel Energy Return 
 

73.4%
66.9%
Show Text 

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

5.5
2.6

Forefoot Compression Video  

Forefoot Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
Mizuno Neo Vista 2 Forefoot Energy Return
 Preview Graph
PUMA MagMax NITRO 2 Forefoot Energy Return

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

72.6%
68.9%
Show Text 

Heel Cushioning 
 

9.2
8.9

Heel Cushioning Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Mizuno Neo Vista 2 Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
PUMA MagMax NITRO 2 Heel Cushioning Picture

Heel Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
Mizuno Neo Vista 2 Heel Cushioning
 Preview Graph
PUMA MagMax NITRO 2 Heel Cushioning

Energy Absorbed At 550N 
 

4.55 J
3.86 J

Energy Absorbed At 1100N 
 

11.67 J
11.21 J

Energy Absorbed At 1900N 
 

19.26 J
20.25 J
Show Text 

Forefoot Cushioning 
 

9.0
8.9

Forefoot Cushioning Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Mizuno Neo Vista 2 Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
PUMA MagMax NITRO 2 Forefoot Cushioning Picture

Forefoot Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
Mizuno Neo Vista 2 Forefoot Cushioning
 Preview Graph
PUMA MagMax NITRO 2 Forefoot Cushioning

Energy Absorbed At 800N 
 

5.90 J
5.45 J

Energy Absorbed At 1300N 
 

10.15 J
9.91 J

Energy Absorbed At 2050N 
 

14.54 J
15.14 J
Show Text 

Heel Firmness 
 

4.3
3.8

Heel Firmness  

 Preview Graph
Mizuno Neo Vista 2 Heel Firmness
 Preview Graph
PUMA MagMax NITRO 2 Heel Firmness

Firmness At 550N 
 

39.7 N/mm
43.6 N/mm

Firmness At 1100N 
 

98.3 N/mm
87.0 N/mm

Firmness At 1900N 
 

220.9 N/mm
157.6 N/mm
Show Text 

Forefoot Firmness 
 

7.3
6.5

Forefoot Firmness  

 Preview Graph
Mizuno Neo Vista 2 Forefoot Firmness
 Preview Graph
PUMA MagMax NITRO 2 Forefoot Firmness

Firmness At 800N 
 

80.8 N/mm
84.7 N/mm

Firmness At 1300N 
 

184.6 N/mm
160.4 N/mm

Firmness At 2050N 
 

386.2 N/mm
291.2 N/mm
Show Text 

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning 
 

7.8
8.0

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
Mizuno Neo Vista 2 Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
 Preview Graph
PUMA MagMax NITRO 2 Forefoot Long Run Cushioning

Energy Absorbed At 10km 
 

8.45 J
9.06 J

Energy Absorbed At 20km 
 

8.32 J
8.77 J

Energy Absorbed At 30km 
 

8.26 J
8.57 J

Energy Absorbed At 40km 
 

8.21 J
8.42 J
Show Text 

Mizuno Neo Vista 2

PUMA MagMax NITRO 2

Comments

  1. Comparison

Mizuno Neo Vista 2 vs PUMA MagMax NITRO 2: Main Discussion

What do you think of these products? Let us know below.


Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Insiders have direct access to buying advice on our insider forum.

PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
No comments yet, refresh to see new ones