Products
Tested using Methodology v0.11
Updated May 12, 2026 01:05 PM
SEE PRICE
Mizuno
Tested using Methodology v0.11
Updated May 13, 2026 01:27 PM
SEE PRICE
DicksSportingGoods.com
Weight
260.8 g (9.20 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
8.9 mm
Plate
Plastic
Weight
244.6 g (8.63 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
7.0 mm
Plate
Plastic
Our Verdict
Mizuno Neo Vista
HOKA Mach X 2
The HOKA Mach X 2 and the Mizuno Neo Vista are both versatile, plastic-plated trainers designed to blend cushioning and performance, but each has distinct strengths. The Mach X 2 stands out as a super trainer for being even more cushioned, lighter, and more responsive, giving it greater versatility across various workouts and paces—from daily runs to faster efforts. The Neo Vista, while heavier and less energetic, still excels as a protective, comfortable option, particularly suited for recovery miles where leg preservation is key, putting it more in the plated premium trainer category.
Variants
- Neo Vista (Estate Blue/River Blue - (Men - US 9))
- Neo Vista (Nimbus Cloud/Vintage Indigo - (Men - US 9))
- Mach X 2 (Black/Electric Aqua - (Men - US 9))
- Mach X 2 (Black/Electric Aqua - (Women - US 7))
Main Differences for
Marathon Racing
Marathon Racing
Threshold
Marathon Racing
7.5
7.8
Weight
6.0
6.6
Forefoot Compression Energy Return
7.1
7.9
Full Comparison
Design
Weight
6.0
6.6
Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Weight
260.8 g (9.20 oz)
244.6 g (8.63 oz)
Stack Heights
Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Stack Height
42.7 mm
44.5 mm
Forefoot Stack Height
33.8 mm
37.5 mm
Heel-To-Toe Drop
8.9 mm
7.0 mm
Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
8.0 mm
5.0 mm
External Shape
3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Outsole Heel Width
91 mm (3.6")
89 mm (3.5")
Outsole Arch Width
83 mm (3.3")
73 mm (2.9")
Outsole Forefoot Width
116 mm (4.6")
109 mm (4.3")
Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
2.13
2.00
Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
3.43
2.91
Internal Shape
3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Internal Length
275 mm (10.8")
275 mm (10.8")
Internal Heel Width
67 mm (2.6")
58 mm (2.3")
Internal Forefoot Width
98 mm (3.9")
92 mm (3.6")
Wide Sizing Available
No
Yes
Forefoot Fit: Width
9.2
9.8
Forefoot Width Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation
2.8 mm (0.111")
0.4 mm (0.015")
Toe TTS Deviation
4.9 mm (0.193")
-1.5 mm (-0.057")
Forefoot Fit: Height
4.3
7.3
Forefoot Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe TTS Deviation
-6.7 mm (-0.262")
-3.3 mm (-0.128")
Arch Fit: Width
9.3
7.0
Arch Fit Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Arch Width TTS Deviation
-1.5 mm (-0.058")
-4.6 mm (-0.181")
Length Fit
7.0
10
Toe Clearance Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Rocker Geometry
8.3
8.0
Heel Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Spring
34 mm (1.3")
29 mm (1.1")
Heel Apex Position
32.4%
18.1%
Heel Rocker Angle
19.7°
22.7°
Forefoot Rocker Geometry
7.3
6.8
Forefoot Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe Spring
50 mm (2.0")
46 mm (1.8")
Toe Apex Position
62.5%
60.1%
Forefoot Rocker Angle
24.4°
22.7°
Other Features
Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Tongue Gusset Type
Non-gusseted
Semi-gusseted
Plate
Plastic
Plastic
Performance
Heel Compression Energy Return
5.1
6.3
Heel Compression Video
Heel Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Heel Energy Return
71.9%
74.0%
Forefoot Compression Energy Return
7.1
7.9
Forefoot Compression Video
Forefoot Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Energy Return
76.5%
80.1%
Heel Cushioning
8.5
8.9
Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 550N
3.83 J
4.36 J
Energy Absorbed At 1100N
10.33 J
11.15 J
Energy Absorbed At 1900N
17.69 J
18.24 J
Forefoot Cushioning
8.4
9.3
Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 800N
5.52 J
6.05 J
Energy Absorbed At 1300N
9.20 J
10.61 J
Energy Absorbed At 2050N
13.17 J
15.82 J
Heel Firmness
4.8
4.7
Heel Firmness
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 550N
47.4 N/mm
42.9 N/mm
Firmness At 1100N
99.5 N/mm
100.3 N/mm
Firmness At 1900N
215.2 N/mm
237.0 N/mm
Forefoot Firmness
7.8
6.5
Forefoot Firmness
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 800N
95.5 N/mm
79.1 N/mm
Firmness At 1300N
204.5 N/mm
159.1 N/mm
Firmness At 2050N
422.5 N/mm
313.2 N/mm
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
8.7
8.4
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 10km
9.81 J
9.37 J
Energy Absorbed At 20km
9.61 J
9.14 J
Energy Absorbed At 30km
9.49 J
9.00 J
Energy Absorbed At 40km
9.42 J
8.89 J
Rocker Stiffness
6.0
7.2
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Video
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Force To Flatten The Rocker
61 N
91 N
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
5.0
7.0
Forefoot Bending Video
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
56.7%
65.0%
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
7.6
7.0
Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Bending Resistance
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
16.0 N/mm
11.2 N/mm
Forefoot Bending Force
291 N
287 N
To access
Become a member
unlimited full product reviews,
product prices, and
other exclusive site features
Mizuno Neo Vista
HOKA Mach X 2
Comments
Mizuno Neo Vista vs HOKA Mach X 2: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.