Running Shoe
Products
In The Lab
Forums
Newsletters
Join now
Best
Running Shoes For Men Women Nike Brooks Marathon Long Distance For Beginners New Balance ASICS Stability HOKA adidas Cheap Cushioned Heavy Runners On Most Comfortable Saucony PUMA
Tools
Compare 3D Compare Results Table Tool Review List Review Index Graph Review Pipeline Vote Custom Ratings
Popular
Dynafish Xiaonian Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra ASICS MEGABLAST Li-Ning Feidian 6 Elite adidas Adizero Evo SL HOKA Bondi 9 ASICS SUPERBLAST 3 ASICS NOVABLAST 6 adidas Adizero Pacer Nike Vomero Plus PUMA Velocity NITRO 5 ASICS NOVABLAST 5 Saucony Endorphin Azura Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Pro Saucony Hurricane 26 Nike Vomero Premium Kiprun Kipstorm Challenger ASICS GEL-KAYANO 33 PUMA Deviate Pure NITRO Saucony Triumph 24
296 Running Shoes bought and tested
Supported by you via membership, and when you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.
  1. Home
  2. Running Shoe
  3. Compare

Nike Run Swift 3 vs ANTA PG7 3

Which Running Shoe Is Better?

    Top
    Main Differences
    Design
      WeightStack HeightsExternal ShapeInternal ShapeForefoot Fit: WidthForefoot Fit: HeightArch Fit: WidthLength FitHeel Rocker GeometryForefoot Rocker GeometryFoamLacesOther Features
    Performance
      Heel Compression Energy ReturnForefoot Compression Energy ReturnHeel CushioningForefoot CushioningHeel FirmnessForefoot FirmnessForefoot Long Run CushioningRocker StiffnessForefoot Bending Energy ReturnForefoot Bending StiffnessHeel Compression DepthForefoot Compression Depth
    Comments

Products

Nike Run Swift 3
ANTA PG7 3

Tested using Methodology v0.15

Updated Sep 03, 2026 04:11 PM

SEE PRICE
Amazon

Tested using Methodology v0.15

Updated Sep 03, 2026 03:27 PM

SEE PRICE
Amazon
Nike Run Swift 3 Picture

Track

ANTA PG7 3 Picture

Track

Heel Stack Height
32.9 mm
Weight
268.9 g (9.48 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
9.9 mm
Plate
None
Heel Stack Height
41.9 mm
Weight
279.4 g (9.86 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
10.3 mm
Plate
None

Our Verdict

Nike Run Swift 3

ANTA PG7 3

The ANTA PG7 3 is a much better running shoe than the Nike Run Swift 3. It costs a little more, but it's a very good daily trainer with much better protection underfoot, a smoother ride, and far more versatility for regular running. It's slightly heavier, however, but the difference is negligible on the road. Get the Run Swift 3 for walking and occasional short runs; spend a little more on the ANTA if running is your priority.

GIFT THIS COMPARISON

0 

Variants

  • Run Swift 3 (Anthracite/Phantom/Light Bone - (Men - US 9))
  • Run Swift 3 (Anthracite/Summit White/Smoke Grey/Cyber - (Men - US 9))
  • PG7 3 (Black - (Men - US 9))
  • PG7 3 (Black - (Women - US 7))

Review

See Nike Run Swift 3 Review
See ANTA PG7 3 Review
0 
0 

Check Price

SEE PRICE
Amazon
SEE PRICE
Amazon
SEE PRICE
Nike.com
SEE PRICE
ANTA
SEE PRICE
DicksSportingGoods.com
SEARCH
DicksSportingGoods.com

Main Differences for
Half/Full Marathon Racing

Threshold 

0.10

Half/Full Marathon Racing 
 

4.4
6.6

Forefoot Stack Height 
 

23.0 mm
31.6 mm

Heel Stack Height 
 

32.9 mm
41.9 mm

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning 
 

4.3
6.6

Forefoot Compression Energy Return 
 

1.8
5.0

Forefoot Bending Energy Return 
 

3.5
6.1

Weight  

5.7
5.2

Full Comparison

Design

Weight  

5.7
5.2

Right Shoe Weight Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Nike Run Swift 3 Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
ANTA PG7 3 Right Shoe Weight Photo

Left Shoe Weight Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Nike Run Swift 3 Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
ANTA PG7 3 Left Shoe Weight Photo

Weight 
 

268.9 g (9.48 oz)
279.4 g (9.86 oz)

Stack Heights 
 

Stack Height Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Nike Run Swift 3 Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
ANTA PG7 3 Stack Height Photo

Heel Stack Height 
 

32.9 mm
41.9 mm

Forefoot Stack Height 
 

23.0 mm
31.6 mm

Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

9.9 mm
10.3 mm

Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

10.0 mm
8.0 mm

External Shape 
 

3D Model Full Shoe  

Preview 3D
Nike Run Swift 3 3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
ANTA PG7 3 3D Model Full Shoe

Outsole Heel Width 
 

89 mm (3.5")
95 mm (3.7")

Outsole Arch Width 
 

67 mm (2.6")
76 mm (3.0")

Outsole Forefoot Width 
 

109 mm (4.3")
114 mm (4.5")

Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

2.70
2.27

Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

4.73
3.61

Internal Shape 
 

3D Model Internal  

Preview 3D
Nike Run Swift 3 3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
ANTA PG7 3 3D Model Internal

Internal Length 
 

274 mm (10.8")
277 mm (10.9")

Internal Heel Width 
 

60 mm (2.4")
68 mm (2.7")

Internal Forefoot Width 
 

91 mm (3.6")
93 mm (3.7")

Wide Sizing Available 
 

Yes
No

Forefoot Fit: Width 
 

9.0
9.2

Forefoot Width Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Nike Run Swift 3 Forefoot Width Photo
Compare High-Res
ANTA PG7 3 Forefoot Width Photo

Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation 
 

2.3 mm (0.092")
3.9 mm (0.152")

Toe TTS Deviation 
 

-2.8 mm (-0.108")
0.1 mm (0.006")

Forefoot Fit: Height 
 

5.1
5.3

Forefoot Height Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Nike Run Swift 3 Forefoot Height Photo
Compare High-Res
ANTA PG7 3 Forefoot Height Photo

Toe TTS Deviation 
 

-5.8 mm (-0.230")
-5.6 mm (-0.220")

Arch Fit: Width 
 

8.0
9.4

Arch Fit Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Nike Run Swift 3 Arch Fit Photo
Compare High-Res
ANTA PG7 3 Arch Fit Photo

Arch Width TTS Deviation 
 

-3.3 mm (-0.131")
-1.3 mm (-0.050")

Length Fit 
 

10
10

Toe Clearance Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Nike Run Swift 3 Toe Clearance Photo
Compare High-Res
ANTA PG7 3 Toe Clearance Photo

Heel Rocker Geometry 
 

6.1
8.5

Heel Rocker Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Nike Run Swift 3 Heel Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
ANTA PG7 3 Heel Rocker Photo

Heel Spring 
 

17 mm (0.7")
32 mm (1.3")

Heel Apex Position 
 

23.6%
20.0%

Heel Rocker Angle 
 

13.7°
28.1°

Forefoot Rocker Geometry 
 

5.7
7.7

Forefoot Rocker Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Nike Run Swift 3 Forefoot Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
ANTA PG7 3 Forefoot Rocker Photo

Toe Spring 
 

40 mm (1.6")
55 mm (2.2")

Toe Apex Position 
 

66.3%
63.3%

Forefoot Rocker Angle 
 

21.8°
26.6°

Foam 
 

Primary Foam Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Nike Run Swift 3 Primary Foam Picture
Compare High-Res
ANTA PG7 3 Primary Foam Picture

Secondary Foam Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Nike Run Swift 3 Secondary Foam Picture
Compare High-Res
ANTA PG7 3 Secondary Foam Picture

Primary Foam Name 
 

N/A
N/A

Primary Foam Type 
 

Unknown
Unknown

Secondary Foam Name 
 

N/A
N/A

Secondary Foam Type 
 

No Secondary Foam
No Secondary Foam

Laces 
 

Laces Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Nike Run Swift 3 Laces Picture
Compare High-Res
ANTA PG7 3 Laces Picture

Lace Type 
 

Flat
Flat

Width 
 

5.5 mm (0.2")
6.0 mm (0.2")

Thickness 
 

1.4 mm (0.1")
1.7 mm (0.1")

Stretch 
 

7.5%
12.5%

Other Features  

Other Features Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Nike Run Swift 3 Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
ANTA PG7 3 Other Features Photo

Tongue Gusset Type 
 

Non-gusseted
Non-gusseted

Plate 
 

None
None
Performance

Heel Compression Energy Return 
 

1.2
2.6

Heel Compression Video  

Heel Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
Nike Run Swift 3 Heel Energy Return
 Preview Graph
ANTA PG7 3 Heel Energy Return
 Compare in Graph Tool

Heel Energy Return 
 

65.5%
68.9%

Forefoot Compression Energy Return 
 

1.8
5.0

Forefoot Compression Video  

Forefoot Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
Nike Run Swift 3 Forefoot Energy Return
 Preview Graph
ANTA PG7 3 Forefoot Energy Return
 Compare in Graph Tool

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

67.4%
71.8%

Heel Cushioning 
 

5.1
8.5

Heel Cushioning Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Nike Run Swift 3 Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
ANTA PG7 3 Heel Cushioning Picture

Heel Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
Nike Run Swift 3 Heel Cushioning
 Preview Graph
ANTA PG7 3 Heel Cushioning
 Compare in Graph Tool

Energy Absorbed At 550N 
 

2.25 J
3.66 J

Energy Absorbed At 1100N 
 

6.95 J
10.49 J

Energy Absorbed At 1900N 
 

12.33 J
18.48 J

Forefoot Cushioning 
 

4.5
7.8

Forefoot Cushioning Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Nike Run Swift 3 Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
ANTA PG7 3 Forefoot Cushioning Picture

Forefoot Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
Nike Run Swift 3 Forefoot Cushioning
 Preview Graph
ANTA PG7 3 Forefoot Cushioning
 Compare in Graph Tool

Energy Absorbed At 800N 
 

2.76 J
4.72 J

Energy Absorbed At 1300N 
 

4.99 J
8.41 J

Energy Absorbed At 2050N 
 

7.67 J
12.47 J

Heel Firmness 
 

9.5
7.1

Heel Firmness Graph  

 Preview Graph
Nike Run Swift 3 Heel Firmness Graph
 Preview Graph
ANTA PG7 3 Heel Firmness Graph
 Compare in Graph Tool

Firmness At 550N 
 

69.5 N/mm
41.8 N/mm

Firmness At 1100N 
 

79.3 N/mm
50.6 N/mm

Firmness At 1900N 
 

108.0 N/mm
69.7 N/mm

Forefoot Firmness 
 

10
8.3

Forefoot Firmness Graph  

 Preview Graph
Nike Run Swift 3 Forefoot Firmness Graph
 Preview Graph
ANTA PG7 3 Forefoot Firmness Graph
 Compare in Graph Tool

Firmness At 800N 
 

108.4 N/mm
59.5 N/mm

Firmness At 1300N 
 

135.9 N/mm
76.2 N/mm

Firmness At 2050N 
 

183 N/mm
105 N/mm

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning 
 

4.3
6.6

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
Nike Run Swift 3 Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
 Preview Graph
ANTA PG7 3 Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
 Compare in Graph Tool

Energy Absorbed At 10km 
 

4.74 J
7.02 J

Energy Absorbed At 20km 
 

4.64 J
6.98 J

Energy Absorbed At 30km 
 

4.56 J
6.94 J

Energy Absorbed At 40km 
 

4.52 J
6.91 J

Rocker Stiffness 
 

5.0
5.3

Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Video  

Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph  

 Preview Graph
Nike Run Swift 3 Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph
 Preview Graph
ANTA PG7 3 Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph
 Compare in Graph Tool

Force To Flatten The Rocker 
 

43 N
48 N

Forefoot Bending Energy Return 
 

3.5
6.1

Forefoot Bending Video  

Forefoot Bending Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
Nike Run Swift 3 Forefoot Bending Energy Return
 Preview Graph
ANTA PG7 3 Forefoot Bending Energy Return
 Compare in Graph Tool

Forefoot Bending Energy Return 
 

51.7%
60.7%

Forefoot Bending Stiffness 
 

5.6
7.1

Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Nike Run Swift 3 Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture
Compare High-Res
ANTA PG7 3 Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture

Forefoot Bending Resistance  

 Preview Graph
Nike Run Swift 3 Forefoot Bending Resistance
 Preview Graph
ANTA PG7 3 Forefoot Bending Resistance
 Compare in Graph Tool

Forefoot Bending Stiffness 
 

3.7 N/mm
11.6 N/mm

Forefoot Bending Force 
 

288 N
288 N

Heel Compression Depth 
 

3.9
6.4

Heel Compression Graph  

 Preview Graph
Nike Run Swift 3 Heel Compression Graph
 Preview Graph
ANTA PG7 3 Heel Compression Graph
 Compare in Graph Tool

Heel Compression At 550N 
 

7.9 mm
13.2 mm

Heel Compression At 1100N 
 

13.9 mm
21.7 mm

Heel Compression At 1900N 
 

17.6 mm
27.3 mm

Forefoot Compression Depth 
 

3.3
5.9

Forefoot Compression Graph  

 Preview Graph
Nike Run Swift 3 Forefoot Compression Graph
 Preview Graph
ANTA PG7 3 Forefoot Compression Graph
 Compare in Graph Tool

Forefoot Compression At 800N 
 

7.4 mm
13.4 mm

Forefoot Compression At 1300N 
 

9.6 mm
17.1 mm

Forefoot Compression At 2050N 
 

11.2 mm
19.6 mm

Check Price

SEE PRICE
Amazon
SEE PRICE
Amazon
SEE PRICE
Nike.com
SEE PRICE
ANTA
SEE PRICE
DicksSportingGoods.com
SEARCH
DicksSportingGoods.com
Back to Top

Nike Run Swift 3

ANTA PG7 3

Comments

  1. Comparison
 • Posted 1 month ago

Nike Run Swift 3 vs ANTA PG7 3: Main Discussion

What do you think of these products? Let us know below.


Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.

See All Shoe Discussions
 Share
0 
PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
No comments yet, refresh to see new ones
We make money directly from you via Membership (which gives you access to extra features), when you buy RTINGS.com Merch, and when you buy a product after clicking a link to a retailer. Learn more about how we work.
We buy our own products, just like you, mostly from the United States. When a product is discontinued or no longer popular, we sell the review units locally. See what products we currently have for sale.
© 2026 9298-5266 Quebec Inc. All Rights Reserved.