Products
Tested using Methodology v0.12
Updated Jun 16, 2026 05:52 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Tested using Methodology v0.12
Updated Jun 17, 2026 08:08 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Weight
242.0 g (8.54 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
7.3 mm
Plate
None
Weight
262.5 g (9.26 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
8.7 mm
Plate
None
Our Verdict
Saucony Endorphin Azura
New Balance Ellipse
The New Balance Ellipse and Saucony Endorphin Azura are two popular trainers, but they offer very different levels of versatility. The Azura is the more adaptable option, combining cushioning with a lighter and more energetic feel that makes it efficient when you pick up the pace, which helps it work well as a one-shoe solution for a wide range of runs. The Ellipse is more of a straightforward daily trainer, best suited to easy runs where its stable and predictable ride feels reassuring but less dynamic.
Variants
- Endorphin Azura (Black/Aqua - (Women - US 7))
- Endorphin Azura (Black/White - (Men - US 9))
- Ellipse (Afterglow/Lone Star Grey - (Women - US 7))
- Ellipse (Afterglow/Lone Star Grey/Silver Metallic - (Men - US 9))
Main Differences for
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Threshold
Half/Full Marathon Racing
7.9
6.2
Forefoot Stack Height
32.9 mm
26.7 mm
Heel Stack Height
40.2 mm
35.4 mm
Weight
6.7
5.9
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
8.1
6.5
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
8.3
5.6
Full Comparison
Design
Weight
6.7
5.9
Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Weight
242.0 g (8.54 oz)
262.5 g (9.26 oz)
Stack Heights
Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Stack Height
40.2 mm
35.4 mm
Forefoot Stack Height
32.9 mm
26.7 mm
Heel-To-Toe Drop
7.3 mm
8.7 mm
Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
8.0 mm
8.0 mm
External Shape
3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Outsole Heel Width
94 mm (3.7")
94 mm (3.7")
Outsole Arch Width
70 mm (2.8")
76 mm (3.0")
Outsole Forefoot Width
116 mm (4.6")
111 mm (4.4")
Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
2.34
2.66
Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
3.53
4.16
Internal Shape
3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Internal Length
278 mm (10.9")
275 mm (10.8")
Internal Heel Width
65 mm (2.6")
71 mm (2.8")
Internal Forefoot Width
93 mm (3.7")
90 mm (3.5")
Wide Sizing Available
No
Yes
Forefoot Fit: Width
9.4
9.7
Forefoot Width Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation
0.2 mm (0.007")
1.3 mm (0.050")
Toe TTS Deviation
-2.7 mm (-0.104")
-1.1 mm (-0.043")
Forefoot Fit: Height
10
4.7
Forefoot Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe TTS Deviation
1.0 mm (0.040")
-6.2 mm (-0.243")
Arch Fit: Width
9.7
8.9
Arch Fit Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Arch Width TTS Deviation
2.8 mm (0.108")
-2.0 mm (-0.078")
Length Fit
10
10
Toe Clearance Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Rocker Geometry
8.3
7.9
Heel Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Spring
29 mm (1.1")
25 mm (1.0")
Heel Apex Position
19.9%
20.3%
Heel Rocker Angle
25.8°
22.6°
Forefoot Rocker Geometry
6.6
5.9
Forefoot Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe Spring
47 mm (1.9")
41 mm (1.6")
Toe Apex Position
70.8%
62.7%
Forefoot Rocker Angle
28.1°
20.4°
Other Features
Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Tongue Gusset Type
Semi-gusseted
Semi-gusseted
Plate
None
None
Performance
Heel Compression Energy Return
8.0
6.6
Heel Compression Video
Heel Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Heel Energy Return
80.9%
74.8%
Forefoot Compression Energy Return
8.3
7.4
Forefoot Compression Video
Forefoot Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Energy Return
82.8%
77.8%
Heel Cushioning
8.3
7.3
Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 550N
3.26 J
3.77 J
Energy Absorbed At 1100N
10.55 J
8.91 J
Energy Absorbed At 1900N
19.04 J
14.36 J
Forefoot Cushioning
8.6
7.0
Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 800N
5.09 J
4.50 J
Energy Absorbed At 1300N
9.59 J
7.54 J
Energy Absorbed At 2050N
14.61 J
10.84 J
Heel Firmness
7.3
7.5
Heel Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 550N
44.7 N/mm
38.8 N/mm
Firmness At 1100N
51.3 N/mm
53.0 N/mm
Firmness At 1900N
69.5 N/mm
77.4 N/mm
Forefoot Firmness
7.5
8.5
Forefoot Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 800N
56.7 N/mm
58.6 N/mm
Firmness At 1300N
70.2 N/mm
78.2 N/mm
Firmness At 2050N
95 N/mm
110 N/mm
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
8.1
6.5
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 10km
8.97 J
7.05 J
Energy Absorbed At 20km
8.77 J
6.92 J
Energy Absorbed At 30km
8.63 J
6.83 J
Energy Absorbed At 40km
8.53 J
6.75 J
Rocker Stiffness
7.7
5.3
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Video
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Force To Flatten The Rocker
107 N
48 N
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
7.8
7.1
Forefoot Bending Video
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
69.9%
65.7%
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
8.3
5.6
Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Bending Resistance
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
19.5 N/mm
8.1 N/mm
Forefoot Bending Force
366 N
207 N
To access
Become a member
unlimited full product reviews,
product prices, and
other exclusive site features
Saucony Endorphin Azura
New Balance Ellipse
Comments
Saucony Endorphin Azura vs New Balance Ellipse: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.