Saucony Endorphin Pro 4 vs PUMA Deviate NITRO 3

Which Running Shoe Is Better?

Products

Saucony Endorphin Pro 4
PUMA Deviate NITRO 3

Tested using Methodology v0.9

Updated Nov 14, 2025 09:26 PM

SEE PRICE
Amazon.com

Tested using Methodology v0.9

Updated Nov 24, 2025 04:29 PM

SEE PRICE
PUMA

Our Verdict

Saucony Endorphin Pro 4

PUMA Deviate NITRO 3

The Saucony Endorphin Pro 4 and the PUMA Deviate NITRO 3 both offer a similar level of cushioning, but they serve slightly different purposes. The Puma is a super trainer with a carbon plate, making it great for high-performance training, while the Saucony is a versatile super shoe primarily built for race day. Despite their similarities in cushioning, the Saucony is the better option for most runners since it is lighter, more stable, and more energetic, providing a snappier, race-ready feel. The Puma, while still capable of fast efforts, leans more toward durability and daily versatility rather than outright speed.

0 

Variants

  • Endorphin Pro 4 (Cavern/Violet - (Women - US 7))
  • Endorphin Pro 4 (Citron/Silver - (Men - US 9))
  • Deviate NITRO 3 (Black/Sun Stream - (Men - US 9))
  • Deviate NITRO 3 (Black/Sunset Glow/Sun Stream - (Women - US 7))

Main Differences for
Marathon Racing

Threshold 

0.10

Marathon Racing 
 

8.3
7.3

Weight  

7.7
5.9

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

8.3
6.7

Heel Energy Return 
 

8.4
5.8

Full Comparison

Design

Weight  

7.7
5.9

Right Shoe Weight Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Saucony Endorphin Pro 4 Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
PUMA Deviate NITRO 3 Right Shoe Weight Photo

Left Shoe Weight Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Saucony Endorphin Pro 4 Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
PUMA Deviate NITRO 3 Left Shoe Weight Photo

Weight 
 

214.9 g (7.58 oz)
262.1 g (9.25 oz)
Show Text 

Stack Heights 
 

Stack Height Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Saucony Endorphin Pro 4 Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
PUMA Deviate NITRO 3 Stack Height Photo

Heel Stack Height 
 

39.3 mm
42.3 mm

Forefoot Stack Height 
 

30.5 mm
31.3 mm

Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

8.8 mm
11.0 mm

Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

8.0 mm
10.0 mm

External Shape 
 

3D Model Full Shoe  

Preview 3D
Saucony Endorphin Pro 4 3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
PUMA Deviate NITRO 3 3D Model Full Shoe

Outsole Heel Width 
 

87 mm (3.4")
83 mm (3.3")

Outsole Arch Width 
 

74 mm (2.9")
58 mm (2.3")

Outsole Forefoot Width 
 

114 mm (4.5")
107 mm (4.2")

Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

2.21
1.96

Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

3.74
3.42

Internal Shape 
 

3D Model Internal  

Preview 3D
Saucony Endorphin Pro 4 3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
PUMA Deviate NITRO 3 3D Model Internal

Internal Length 
 

270 mm (10.6")
275 mm (10.8")

Internal Heel Width 
 

53 mm (2.1")
60 mm (2.4")

Internal Forefoot Width 
 

87 mm (3.4")
91 mm (3.6")

Wide Sizing Available 
 

No
Yes

Other Features  

Other Features Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Saucony Endorphin Pro 4 Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
PUMA Deviate NITRO 3 Other Features Photo

Tongue Gusset Type 
 

Non-gusseted
Semi-gusseted

Plate 
 

Carbon Fiber
Carbon Fiber
Performance

Heel Energy Return 
 

8.4
5.8

Heel Compression Video  

Heel Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
Saucony Endorphin Pro 4 Heel Energy Return
 Preview Graph
PUMA Deviate NITRO 3 Heel Energy Return

Heel Energy Return 
 

83.2%
73.1%
Show Text 

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

8.3
6.7

Forefoot Compression Video  

Forefoot Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
Saucony Endorphin Pro 4 Forefoot Energy Return
 Preview Graph
PUMA Deviate NITRO 3 Forefoot Energy Return

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

82.6%
75.0%
Show Text 

Heel Cushioning 
 

7.4
7.3

Heel Cushioning Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Saucony Endorphin Pro 4 Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
PUMA Deviate NITRO 3 Heel Cushioning Picture

Heel Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
Saucony Endorphin Pro 4 Heel Cushioning
 Preview Graph
PUMA Deviate NITRO 3 Heel Cushioning

Energy Absorbed At 550N 
 

3.14 J
3.30 J

Energy Absorbed At 1100N 
 

9.21 J
8.83 J

Energy Absorbed At 1900N 
 

16.16 J
15.65 J
Show Text 

Forefoot Cushioning 
 

7.1
6.4

Forefoot Cushioning Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Saucony Endorphin Pro 4 Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
PUMA Deviate NITRO 3 Forefoot Cushioning Picture

Forefoot Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
Saucony Endorphin Pro 4 Forefoot Cushioning
 Preview Graph
PUMA Deviate NITRO 3 Forefoot Cushioning

Energy Absorbed At 800N 
 

4.33 J
3.90 J

Energy Absorbed At 1300N 
 

7.59 J
6.80 J

Energy Absorbed At 2050N 
 

11.50 J
10.08 J
Show Text 

Heel Firmness 
 

5.6
5.8

Heel Firmness  

 Preview Graph
Saucony Endorphin Pro 4 Heel Firmness
 Preview Graph
PUMA Deviate NITRO 3 Heel Firmness

Firmness At 550N 
 

55.2 N/mm
58.3 N/mm

Firmness At 1100N 
 

103.1 N/mm
111.8 N/mm

Firmness At 1900N 
 

250.7 N/mm
227.5 N/mm
Show Text 

Forefoot Firmness 
 

8.1
8.6

Forefoot Firmness  

 Preview Graph
Saucony Endorphin Pro 4 Forefoot Firmness
 Preview Graph
PUMA Deviate NITRO 3 Forefoot Firmness

Firmness At 800N 
 

115.3 N/mm
126.6 N/mm

Firmness At 1300N 
 

215.0 N/mm
251.3 N/mm

Firmness At 2050N 
 

416.1 N/mm
479.0 N/mm
Show Text 

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning 
 

6.5
5.7

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
Saucony Endorphin Pro 4 Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
 Preview Graph
PUMA Deviate NITRO 3 Forefoot Long Run Cushioning

Energy Absorbed At 10km 
 

7.05 J
6.40 J

Energy Absorbed At 20km 
 

6.93 J
6.19 J

Energy Absorbed At 30km 
 

6.84 J
6.06 J

Energy Absorbed At 40km 
 

6.76 J
5.95 J

Saucony Endorphin Pro 4

PUMA Deviate NITRO 3

Comments

  1. Comparison

Saucony Endorphin Pro 4 vs PUMA Deviate NITRO 3: Main Discussion

What do you think of these products? Let us know below.


Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Insiders have direct access to buying advice on our insider forum.

PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
No comments yet, refresh to see new ones