Tested using Methodology v2.2
Updated Jun 18, 2026 09:00 PM
Tested using Methodology v2.2
Updated May 20, 2026 01:27 PM
Samsung S95H OLED
LG G6 OLED
The Samsung S95H OLED is a bit better than the LG G6 OLED overall. Colors are brighter and more vibrant on the Samsung, resulting in a slightly more realistic HDR experience overall. The two TVs have similar brightness, but the LG can sustain bright highlights longer, though content that actually shows this difference is extremely rare. The Samsung's matte anti-reflective coating does a much better job of reducing glare during the day, but the LG maintains picture quality better, with less black level rise in a bright room. The LG also has better processing, especially when displaying low-quality content.
Samsung S95H OLED
LG G6 OLED
Comments
Samsung S95H OLED vs LG G6 OLED: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.
It’s not just about the S95H reaching very high brightness levels — the real issue is how long it can sustain that brightness. If you pay attention to many reviews, you’ll notice that Samsung’s ABL (Automatic Brightness Limiter) behavior is often described as very aggressive. In other words, the TV can hit extremely high brightness for short moments, but it struggles to maintain that level during longer bright scenes.
Also, producing “more colors” alone is not what matters most. What’s truly important is producing more accurate, natural, and reference-level colors. A wider color volume on paper does not always translate into a better or more realistic image.
Then there’s the MAT OLED aspect. If you see the S95H and the G6 side by side with your own eyes, the difference becomes much more obvious. The matte coating significantly changes the classic OLED look and feel. Colors can appear more pastel-like, the sense of depth is reduced, and in bright environments the image can sometimes look slightly hazy. Next to the G6, the traditional glossy OLED depth and contrast perception feels much stronger.
As for software, I personally no longer fully trust Samsung in that area. I own a 65S95B myself, and compared to when the TV first launched, I genuinely feel that firmware updates have reduced its brightness by around 30%. That’s why I think Samsung’s “launch review performance” and long-term real-world performance may not always remain the same.
It’s not just about the S95H reaching very high brightness levels — the real issue is how long it can sustain that brightness. If you pay attention to many reviews, you’ll notice that Samsung’s ABL (Automatic Brightness Limiter) behavior is often described as very aggressive. In other words, the TV can hit extremely high brightness for short moments, but it struggles to maintain that level during longer bright scenes.
Also, producing “more colors” alone is not what matters most. What’s truly important is producing more accurate, natural, and reference-level colors. A wider color volume on paper does not always translate into a better or more realistic image.
Then there’s the MAT OLED aspect. If you see the S95H and the G6 side by side with your own eyes, the difference becomes much more obvious. The matte coating significantly changes the classic OLED look and feel. Colors can appear more pastel-like, the sense of depth is reduced, and in bright environments the image can sometimes look slightly hazy. Next to the G6, the traditional glossy OLED depth and contrast perception feels much stronger.
As for software, I personally no longer fully trust Samsung in that area. I own a 65S95B myself, and compared to when the TV first launched, I genuinely feel that firmware updates have reduced its brightness by around 30%. That’s why I think Samsung’s “launch review performance” and long-term real-world performance may not always remain the same.
On the stutter section for the s95h versus the g6 green ball. Is the green ball not ghosting? There’s a very prominent double image that’s not prominent on the g6
S95H cant sustain anything. Love to see it.
LG definitely messed up again with their Firmware on release date! It feels like they have become a Video Game Studio, releasing an unoptimized and broken product wirh tons of bugs on release day! LG need to do better than that. Whoever is in charge of the TV Dept. needs to be reminded that when someone pays ~$5000 (incl. Taxes) for a 77" TV, it should be flawless (Hardware AND Software) !!! Kudos to Samsung to putting the hard work right away! I guess we will have to wait for a real S95H vs G6 comparison…
LG really screwed up with their release Firmware, I really hope they fixed everything with the firmware 43.10.68 or will fix it very soon! At ~$5000 (incl. Taxes) the TVs should release in perfect condition! It feels like they are acting llike a Video Game Studio right now aka releasing games that are not really optimized and broken on release day. The G6 seems like an amazing TV but held down by its software… Such a shame! Whoever is at the head of the TV Department is not doing his job right. Kudos to Samsung who seem to have put a lot more work into their software (and harware) and really made their S95H a much better product than the S95F ! We will have to wait for future updates to see which of the S95H and G6 is really the King of TVs in 2026.