Tested using Methodology v2.0.1
Updated Nov 20, 2025 01:54 PM
Tested using Methodology v2.1
Updated Nov 25, 2025 08:17 PM
TCL QM7K
TCL QM8K
The TCL QM8K is significantly better than the TCL QM7K. The QM8K gets a lot brighter, delivering bright highlights in HDR and a more impactful HDR experience overall. This higher peak brightness also translates to a better bright-room experience, as the QM8K can overcome more glare in a bright room. The Mini LED local dimming feature on the QM8K is also better, resulting in less haloing around bright spots in the scene.
TCL QM7K
TCL QM8K
Comments
TCL QM7K vs TCL QM8K: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Insiders have direct access to buying advice on our insider forum.
Very interesting and educative answer. Thanks a lot for reply
Hey there, those are great questions!
Black uniformity is really completely separate from contrast. Our contrast measurements look at how deep blacks are across a handful of specific points, whereas the black uniformity test looks at how uniform those measurements are, regardless of how deep they are. There are some TVs that have terrible contrast, but fantastic uniformity, for example. So the two really have nothing to do with one another.
Considering that these TVs both reach pretty high brightness levels, I think the EOTF tracking is more important. Even the QM7K exceeds the peak brightness of most HDR content, so higher brightness really only helps in the rare case of content that’s been mastered at a very high brightness level, and for very bright specular highlights in some scenes. 90% of the time the QM7K is bright enough to display HDR content as-is.
Thanks for review. Can you please comment on following: