Products
Tested using Methodology v1.2
Updated Jul 23, 2026 05:20 PM
SEE PRICE
Novaform
Tested using Methodology v1.2
Updated Aug 18, 2026 04:41 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Mattress Type
Foam
Bed-In-A-Box
Yes
Upper Comfort Foam @ LumbarMemory Foam
Firmness Level
Medium-Firm (58 Pa/mm)
Mattress Type
Hybrid
Bed-In-A-Box
Yes
Upper Comfort Foam @ LumbarMemory Foam
Firmness Level
Medium (44 Pa/mm)
Our Verdict
Novaform DreamAway
Helix Midnight Luxe 2025
The Helix Midnight Luxe 2025 is a better mattress than the Novaform DreamAway, particularly for side sleepers. It provides more pressure relief for sleepers in any weight category, resulting in less pressure on the arm and shoulder when side sleeping. It's also bouncier and more responsive, which makes it easier to move around on. While the Helix is more expensive, it's also more durable, so it'll resist sagging and forming indentations for longer.
Variants
- DreamAway (Full)
- DreamAway (Twin)
- Midnight Luxe 2025 (California King)
- Midnight Luxe 2025 (Full)
Check Price
California King
Midnight Luxe 2025
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Full
DreamAway
SEE PRICE
Novaform
Full
Midnight Luxe 2025
SEE PRICE
Helix
King
Midnight Luxe 2025
SEE PRICE
Helix
Queen
Midnight Luxe 2025
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Twin
DreamAway
SEE PRICE
Novaform
Twin
Midnight Luxe 2025
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Twin XL
Midnight Luxe 2025
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Main Differences for
Side Sleeping
Side Sleeping
Threshold
Side Sleeping
6.7
8.2
Full Comparison
Design
Style
Style Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Mattress Type
Foam
Hybrid
Bed-In-A-Box
Yes
Yes
Quilted Top Layer
No
Yes
Grab Handles
No
Yes
Thickness
19.9 cm (7.8")
34.8 cm (13.7")
Performance
Firmness
Head/Feet Firmness
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Lumbar Firmness
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness Video
Normalized Stiffness @ Head/Feet
61 Pa/mm
41 Pa/mm
Normalized Stiffness @ Lumbar
58 Pa/mm
44 Pa/mm
Firmness Level
Medium-Firm (58 Pa/mm)
Medium (44 Pa/mm)
Body Conformity
6.2
8.3
Shoulder Indentation vs. Body Weight
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Body Conformity Picture
Body Conformity Picture 2
Indent @ 50 kg (110 lb)
36 mm (1.4")
55 mm (2.2")
Indent @ 80 kg (176 lb)
53 mm (2.1")
83 mm (3.3")
Indent @ 110 kg (242 lb)
68 mm (2.7")
105 mm (4.1")
Support
7.4
7.2
Pelvis Indentation vs. Body Weight
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Indent Difference @ 50 kg (110 lb)
11 mm (0.4")
18 mm (0.7")
Indent Difference @ 80 kg (176 lb)
19 mm (0.8")
22 mm (0.9")
Indent Difference @ 110 kg (242 lb)
22 mm (0.9")
22 mm (0.9")
Bounciness
2.2
7.4
Bounciness Video
Maximum Rebound Height
2.0 cm (0.8")
15.0 cm (5.9")
Comfort Layers Envelopment
8.3
8.0
Sinking & Contouring Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Sinking Depth
4.6 cm (1.8")
5.3 cm (2.1")
Diameter Of Distortion
23.3 cm (9.2")
27.0 cm (10.6")
Responsiveness
6.6
8.4
Responsiveness Video
Response Time
1.6 s
0.7 s
Motion Isolation
8.2
8.2
Motion Isolation Video
Head/Feet Motion Isolation
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Lumbar Motion Isolation
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Peak Acceleration @ Head/Feet
1.38 g
0.88 g
Dissipation Time @ Head/Feet
0.24 s
0.53 s
Peak Acceleration @ Lumbar
3.96 g
1.94 g
Dissipation Time @ Lumbar
0.25 s
0.61 s
Edge Support
8.0
9.0
Naturalistic Loading Pad Video
Naturalistic Loading Pad
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Small Platen
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Naturalistic Loading Pad Indentation
120 mm
134 mm
Small Platen Indentation @ 0 mm From Edge
145 mm
147 mm
Small Platen Indentation @ 150 mm From Edge
115 mm
150 mm
Increased Indentation @ Mattress Edge
30 mm
-3 mm
Cooling
0.0
8.2
Cooling Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Transferred Over 1st Hour
N/A
63 kJ
Energy Transferred Over 8 Hours
N/A
176 kJ
Components
Cover
Cover Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Sleeping Surface Material
Polyester, Nylon
TENCEL
Removable
Yes
No
Machine Washable
No
No
Edge Construction
Edge Support Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Edge Component
None
Pocket Coils
Foam Layer Material
Foam Layer Material Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Quilted Top Fill
N/A
Memory Foam + Polyfoam + Fiber Fill
Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
Memory Foam
Memory Foam
Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
Memory Foam
Memory Foam
Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
N/A
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
N/A
N/A
Transition Foam
Polyfoam
Polyfoam
Support Foam
Polyfoam
N/A
Foam Layer Mass Density
5.9
6.8
Quilted Top Fill
N/A
25 kg/m³ (1.6 lb/cu.ft.)
Quilted Top Fill Foam Density vs. Reference
N/A
0.7
Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
38 kg/m³ (2.4 lb/cu.ft.)
68 kg/m³ (4.2 lb/cu.ft.)
Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet Density vs. Reference
0.6
1.1
Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
38 kg/m³ (2.4 lb/cu.ft.)
68 kg/m³ (4.2 lb/cu.ft.)
Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar Density vs. Reference
0.6
1.1
Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
N/A
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet Density vs. Reference
N/A
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
N/A
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar Density vs. Reference
N/A
N/A
Transition Foam
23 kg/m³ (1.4 lb/cu.ft.)
30 kg/m³ (1.8 lb/cu.ft.)
Transition Foam Density vs. Reference
0.5
1.0
Support Foam
32 kg/m³ (2.0 lb/cu.ft.)
N/A
Support Foam Density vs Reference
1.1
N/A
Foam Layer Thickness
Foam Layer Thickness Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Quilted Top
N/A
5.0 cm (2.0")
Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
4.5 cm (1.8")
5.1 cm (2.0")
Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
4.5 cm (1.8")
5.1 cm (2.0")
Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
N/A
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
N/A
N/A
Transition Foam
4.7 cm (1.9")
2.5 cm (1.0")
Support Foam
10.5 cm (4.1")
N/A
Spring Layer Dimensions
Spring Layer Height Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Spring Layer Density Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Comfort Layer Height
N/A
N/A
Comfort Layer Coil Density
N/A
N/A
Comfort Layer Coil Gauge
N/A
N/A
Support Layer Height
N/A
20.5 cm (8.1")
Support Layer Coil Density
N/A
248 coils/m² (23 coils/ft²)
Support Layer Coil Gauge @ Head/Feet
N/A
14 gauge
Support Layer Coil Gauge @ Lumbar
N/A
13 gauge
Foam Layer Firmness
Comfort Layer IPD
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Transition & Support Layer IPD
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Quilted Top Fill 25% IPD
N/A
1.4 kPa
Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet 25% IPD
1.5 kPa
2.2 kPa
Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar 25% IPD
1.5 kPa
2.2 kPa
Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet 25% IPD
N/A
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar 25% IPD
N/A
N/A
Transition Foam 25% IPD
2.9 kPa
4.3 kPa
Support Foam 25% IPD
4.1 kPa
N/A
Spring Layer Firmness
Comfort Layer Firmness
Support Layer Firmness
Preview Graph
Spring Layer Firmness
Normalized Comfort Layer Stiffness @ Head/Feet
N/A
N/A
Normalized Comfort Layer Stiffness @ Lumbar
N/A
N/A
Normalized Support Layer Stiffness @ Head/Feet
N/A
81 Pa/mm
Normalized Support Layer Stiffness @ Lumbar
N/A
54 Pa/mm
Foam Layer Resilience
Foam Layer Resilience Video
Quilted Top Fill
N/A
45%
Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
4%
2%
Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
4%
2%
Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
N/A
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
N/A
N/A
Transition Foam
47%
47%
Support Foam
29%
N/A
Spring Layer Bounciness
Comfort Spring Layer Bounciness Video
Support Spring Layer Bounciness Video
Comfort Spring Layer Maximum Rebound Height
N/A
N/A
Support Spring Layer Maximum Rebound Height
N/A
46.0 cm (18.1")
Check Price
California King
Midnight Luxe 2025
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Full
DreamAway
SEE PRICE
Novaform
Full
Midnight Luxe 2025
SEE PRICE
Helix
King
Midnight Luxe 2025
SEE PRICE
Helix
Queen
Midnight Luxe 2025
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Twin
DreamAway
SEE PRICE
Novaform
Twin
Midnight Luxe 2025
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Twin XL
Midnight Luxe 2025
SEE PRICE
Amazon
To access
Become a member
unlimited full product reviews,
product prices, and
other exclusive site features
Novaform DreamAway
Helix Midnight Luxe 2025
Comments
Novaform DreamAway vs Helix Midnight Luxe 2025: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.