Products
Tested using Methodology v1.2
Updated Sep 03, 2026 12:09 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Tested using Methodology v1.2
Updated Sep 03, 2026 12:47 PM
SEE PRICE
Zinus
Mattress Type
Foam
Bed-In-A-Box
Yes
Upper Comfort Foam @ LumbarMemory Foam
Firmness Level
Medium-Plush (39 Pa/mm)
Mattress Type
Foam
Bed-In-A-Box
Yes
Upper Comfort Foam @ LumbarMemory Foam
Firmness Level
Firm (69 Pa/mm)
Our Verdict
SweetNight CoolNest
Zinus Original Green Tea 2025
You might prefer either the Zinus Original Green Tea 2025 or the SweetNight CoolNest, depending on your needs. The SweetNight has much better cooling and is more suitable for hot sleepers. It's more responsive, which makes it feel easier to move around on. It also offers more pressure relief, so it's more comfortable for many side sleepers. However, the Zinus is more supportive, making it a better option for most back and stomach sleepers. It uses better-quality foam and has a more durable design.
Variants
- CoolNest (14") (California King)
- CoolNest (14") (Full)
- Original Green Tea 2025 (Full)
- Original Green Tea 2025 (King)
Check Price
California King
CoolNest (14")
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Full
CoolNest (14")
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Full
Original Green Tea 2025
SEARCH
Amazon
King
CoolNest (14")
SEE PRICE
Amazon
King
Original Green Tea 2025
SEARCH
Amazon
Queen
CoolNest (14")
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Queen
Original Green Tea 2025
SEE PRICE
Zinus
Twin
CoolNest (14")
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Twin
Original Green Tea 2025
SEARCH
Amazon
Main Differences for
Side Sleeping
Side Sleeping
Threshold
Side Sleeping
8.0
6.2
Full Comparison
Design
Style
Style Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Mattress Type
Foam
Foam
Bed-In-A-Box
Yes
Yes
Quilted Top Layer
No
No
Grab Handles
No
No
Thickness
34.5 cm (13.6")
24.8 cm (9.8")
Performance
Firmness
Head/Feet Firmness
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Lumbar Firmness
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness Video
Normalized Stiffness @ Head/Feet
39 Pa/mm
65 Pa/mm
Normalized Stiffness @ Lumbar
39 Pa/mm
69 Pa/mm
Firmness Level
Medium-Plush (39 Pa/mm)
Firm (69 Pa/mm)
Body Conformity
8.2
5.7
Shoulder Indentation vs. Body Weight
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Body Conformity Picture 1
Body Conformity Picture 2
Indent @ 50 kg (110 lb)
52 mm (2.0")
31 mm (1.2")
Indent @ 80 kg (176 lb)
79 mm (3.1")
47 mm (1.9")
Indent @ 110 kg (242 lb)
113 mm (4.4")
67 mm (2.6")
Support
6.0
7.4
Pelvis Indentation vs. Body Weight
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Indent Difference @ 50 kg (110 lb)
24 mm (0.9")
13 mm (0.5")
Indent Difference @ 80 kg (176 lb)
28 mm (1.1")
16 mm (0.6")
Indent Difference @ 110 kg (242 lb)
39 mm (1.5")
24 mm (0.9")
Bounciness
6.3
5.7
Bounciness Video
Maximum Rebound Height
9.0 cm (3.5")
7.0 cm (2.8")
Comfort Layers Envelopment
8.4
7.7
Sinking & Contouring Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Sinking Depth
5.0 cm (2.0")
4.7 cm (1.8")
Diameter Of Distortion
24.9 cm (9.8")
26.4 cm (10.4")
Responsiveness
8.8
5.7
Responsiveness Video
Response Time
0.6 s
2.2 s
Motion Isolation
8.2
8.2
Motion Isolation Video
Head/Feet Motion Isolation
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Lumbar Motion Isolation
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Peak Acceleration @ Head/Feet
0.35 g
0.61 g
Dissipation Time @ Head/Feet
0.36 s
0.24 s
Peak Acceleration @ Lumbar
3.80 g
4.33 g
Dissipation Time @ Lumbar
0.33 s
0.29 s
Edge Support
5.7
6.4
Naturalistic Loading Pad Video
Naturalistic Loading Pad
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Small Platen
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Naturalistic Loading Pad Indentation
186 mm
160 mm
Small Platen Indentation @ 0 mm From Edge
205 mm
164 mm
Small Platen Indentation @ 150 mm From Edge
172 mm
131 mm
Increased Indentation @ Mattress Edge
32 mm
33 mm
Cooling
8.4
7.5
Cooling Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Transferred Over 1st Hour
68 kJ
60 kJ
Energy Transferred Over 8 Hours
177 kJ
154 kJ
Components
Cover
Cover Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Sleeping Surface Material
Polyester
Polyester
Removable
Yes
Yes
Machine Washable
No
No
Edge Construction
Edge Support Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Edge Component
None
None
Foam Layer Material
Foam Layer Material Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Quilted Top Fill
N/A
N/A
Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
Memory Foam
Memory Foam
Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
Memory Foam
Memory Foam
Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
Memory Foam
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
Memory Foam
N/A
Transition Foam
Polyfoam
Polyfoam
Support Foam
Polyfoam
Polyfoam
Foam Layer Mass Density
5.5
6.7
Quilted Top Fill
N/A
N/A
Quilted Top Fill Foam Density vs. Reference
N/A
N/A
Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
51 kg/m³ (3.2 lb/cu.ft.)
40 kg/m³ (2.5 lb/cu.ft.)
Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet Density vs. Reference
0.8
0.6
Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
51 kg/m³ (3.2 lb/cu.ft.)
40 kg/m³ (2.5 lb/cu.ft.)
Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar Density vs. Reference
0.8
0.6
Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
27 kg/m³ (1.7 lb/cu.ft.)
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet Density vs. Reference
0.4
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
27 kg/m³ (1.7 lb/cu.ft.)
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar Density vs. Reference
0.4
N/A
Transition Foam
27 kg/m³ (1.7 lb/cu.ft.)
30 kg/m³ (1.9 lb/cu.ft.)
Transition Foam Density vs. Reference
0.8
1.0
Support Foam
24 kg/m³ (1.5 lb/cu.ft.)
30 kg/m³ (1.9 lb/cu.ft.)
Support Foam Density vs Reference
0.6
1.0
Foam Layer Thickness
Foam Layer Thickness Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Quilted Top
N/A
N/A
Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
2.5 cm (1.0")
3.9 cm (1.5")
Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
2.5 cm (1.0")
3.9 cm (1.5")
Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
5.0 cm (2.0")
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
5.0 cm (2.0")
N/A
Transition Foam
14.5 cm (5.7")
6.1 cm (2.4")
Support Foam
12.5 cm (4.9")
15.0 cm (5.9")
Spring Layer Dimensions
Spring Layer Height Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Spring Layer Density Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Comfort Layer Height
N/A
N/A
Comfort Layer Coil Density
N/A
Comfort Layer Coil Gauge
N/A
N/A
Support Layer Height
N/A
N/A
Support Layer Coil Density
N/A
Support Layer Coil Gauge @ Head/Feet
N/A
N/A
Support Layer Coil Gauge @ Lumbar
N/A
N/A
Foam Layer Firmness
Comfort Layer IPD
Preview Graph
Transition & Support Layer IPD
Preview Graph
Quilted Top Fill 25% IPD
N/A
Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet 25% IPD
1.6 kPa
Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar 25% IPD
1.6 kPa
Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet 25% IPD
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar 25% IPD
N/A
Transition Foam 25% IPD
3.6 kPa
Support Foam 25% IPD
4.1 kPa
Spring Layer Firmness
Comfort Layer Firmness
Support Layer Firmness
Spring Layer Firmness
Normalized Comfort Layer Stiffness @ Head/Feet
N/A
Normalized Comfort Layer Stiffness @ Lumbar
N/A
Normalized Support Layer Stiffness @ Head/Feet
N/A
Normalized Support Layer Stiffness @ Lumbar
N/A
Foam Layer Resilience
Foam Layer Resilience Video
Quilted Top Fill
N/A
N/A
Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
16%
7%
Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
16%
7%
Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
4%
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
4%
N/A
Transition Foam
43%
42%
Support Foam
46%
44%
Spring Layer Bounciness
Comfort Spring Layer Bounciness Video
Support Spring Layer Bounciness Video
Comfort Spring Layer Maximum Rebound Height
N/A
Support Spring Layer Maximum Rebound Height
N/A
Check Price
California King
CoolNest (14")
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Full
CoolNest (14")
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Full
Original Green Tea 2025
SEARCH
Amazon
King
CoolNest (14")
SEE PRICE
Amazon
King
Original Green Tea 2025
SEARCH
Amazon
Queen
CoolNest (14")
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Queen
Original Green Tea 2025
SEE PRICE
Zinus
Twin
CoolNest (14")
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Twin
Original Green Tea 2025
SEARCH
Amazon
To access
Become a member
unlimited full product reviews,
product prices, and
other exclusive site features
SweetNight CoolNest
Zinus Original Green Tea 2025
Comments
SweetNight CoolNest vs Zinus Original Green Tea 2025: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.