Mattress
Products
In The Lab
Forums
Newsletters
Insider Access
Best
Mattresses Side Sleepers Brands Memory Foam Firm Heavy People Mattresses-In-A-Box Hybrid Cooling
Tools
Compare NEW Results Table Tool Review List Review Index Graph Custom Ratings
Popular
Saatva Latex Hybrid Helix Midnight Luxe 2025 Novaform Legacy Purple Mattress Sealy Posturepedic Hybrid Boring Mattress Casper Snow Brooklyn Bedding Signature Hybrid Saatva Classic (Plush Soft) Novaform ComfortGrande Plus Beautyrest Silver BRS900 Sleep On Latex Pure Green Organic Saatva Classic Big Fig Mattress Nectar Premier Stearns & Foster Lux Estate Beautyrest Black Beautyrest Mattress Tempur-Pedic TEMPUR-Adapt Bear Elite Hybrid
49 Mattresses bought and tested
Supported by you via insider access, and when you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.
  1. Home
  2. Mattress
  3. Compare

Tuft and Needle Mint vs Saatva Classic (Plush Soft)

Which Mattress Is Better?

    Top
    Main Differences
    Design
      Style
    Performance
      FirmnessBody ConformitySupportBouncinessComfort Layers EnvelopmentResponsivenessMotion IsolationEdge SupportCooling
    Components
      CoverEdge ConstructionFoam Layer MaterialFoam Layer Mass DensityFoam Layer ThicknessSpring Layer DimensionsFoam Layer FirmnessSpring Layer FirmnessFoam Layer ResilienceSpring Layer Bounciness
    Comments

Products

Tuft and Needle Mint
Saatva Classic (Plush Soft)

Tested using Methodology v1.1

Updated Feb 16, 2026 10:10 PM

SEE PRICE
Amazon.com

Tested using Methodology v1.1

Updated Jan 19, 2026 08:26 PM

SEE PRICE
Saatva
Tuft and Needle Mint Picture
Saatva Classic (Plush Soft) Picture
Mattress Type
Foam
Bed-In-A-Box
Yes
Upper Comfort Foam @ LumbarPolyfoam
Firmness Level
Medium (46 Pa/mm)
Mattress Type
Innerspring
Bed-In-A-Box
No
Upper Comfort Foam @ LumbarMemory Foam
Firmness Level
Medium-Plush (39 Pa/mm)
  1. Recommended in 4 articles:
  2. Mattresses
  3. Side Sleepers
  4. Heavy People
  5. 1

Our Verdict

Tuft and Needle Mint

Saatva Classic (Plush Soft)

The Tuft and Needle Mint is better than the Saatva Classic (Plush Soft) for most people. Both mattresses are well-suited for side sleepers, offering enough pressure relief even for lighter side sleepers. The Tuft and Needle is more supportive, so it can work for a wider range of back and stomach sleepers. It also offers significantly better motion isolation. That said, it's not very bouncy, and you might prefer the Saatva's much springier feel, which makes it feel easier to move around in your sleep.

0 

Variants

  • Mint (Queen)
  • Classic (Queen (Plush Soft/14.5"))

Review

See Tuft and Needle Mint Review
See Saatva Classic (Plush Soft) Review
2 
0 

Check Price

Queen
Mint
SEE PRICE
Amazon.com
 
 
Queen (Plush Soft/14.5")
Classic
SEE PRICE
Saatva

Main Differences for
Side Sleeping

Threshold 

0.10

Side Sleeping 
 

7.9
8.4

Comfort Layers Envelopment 
 

5.9
8.2

Full Comparison

Design

Style 
 

Style Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Tuft and Needle Mint Style Picture
Compare High-Res
Saatva Classic (Plush Soft) Style Picture

Mattress Type 
 

Foam
Innerspring

Bed-In-A-Box 
 

Yes
No

Quilted Top Layer 
 

No
Yes

Grab Handles 
 

No
Yes

Thickness  

30.1 cm (11.9")
38.3 cm (15.1")
Show Text 
Performance

Firmness 
 

Head/Feet Firmness  

 Preview Graph
Tuft and Needle Mint Head/Feet Firmness
 Preview Graph
Saatva Classic (Plush Soft) Head/Feet Firmness
 Compare in Graph Tool

Lumbar Firmness  

 Preview Graph
Tuft and Needle Mint Lumbar Firmness
 Preview Graph
Saatva Classic (Plush Soft) Lumbar Firmness
 Compare in Graph Tool

Firmness Video  

Normalized Stiffness @ Head/Feet 
 

44 Pa/mm
39 Pa/mm

Normalized Stiffness @ Lumbar 
 

46 Pa/mm
39 Pa/mm

Firmness Level 
 

Medium (46 Pa/mm)
Medium-Plush (39 Pa/mm)
Show Text 

Body Conformity 
 

8.4
8.7

Shoulder Indentation vs. Body Weight  

 Preview Graph
Tuft and Needle Mint Shoulder Indentation vs. Body Weight
 Preview Graph
Saatva Classic (Plush Soft) Shoulder Indentation vs. Body Weight
 Compare in Graph Tool

Indent @ 50 kg (110 lb) 
 

60 mm (2.4")
64 mm (2.5")

Indent @ 80 kg (172 lb) 
 

84 mm (3.3")
91 mm (3.6")

Indent @ 110 kg (242 lb) 
 

99 mm (3.9")
112 mm (4.4")
Show Text 

Support 
 

7.6
6.5

Pelvis Indentation vs. Body Weight  

 Preview Graph
Tuft and Needle Mint Pelvis Indentation vs. Body Weight
 Preview Graph
Saatva Classic (Plush Soft) Pelvis Indentation vs. Body Weight
 Compare in Graph Tool

Indent Difference @ 50 kg (110 lb) 
 

14 mm (0.6")
21 mm (0.8")

Indent Difference @ 80 kg (172 lb) 
 

18 mm (0.7")
27 mm (1.1")

Indent Difference @ 110 kg (242 lb) 
 

16 mm (0.6")
30 mm (1.2")
Show Text 

Bounciness 
 

6.9
8.7

Bounciness Video  

Maximum Rebound Height 
 

12.0 cm (4.7")
26.0 cm (10.2")
Show Text 

Comfort Layers Envelopment 
 

5.9
8.2

Sinking & Contouring Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Tuft and Needle Mint Sinking & Contouring Picture
Compare High-Res
Saatva Classic (Plush Soft) Sinking & Contouring Picture

Sinking Depth 
 

5.6 cm (2.2")
5.2 cm (2.1")

Diameter Of Distortion 
 

34.9 cm (13.7")
26.5 cm (10.4")
Show Text 

Responsiveness 
 

9.1
9.2

Responsiveness Video  

Response Time 
 

0.5 s
0.5 s
Show Text 

Motion Isolation 
 

9.0
6.5

Motion Isolation Video  

Head/Feet Motion Isolation  

 Preview Graph
Tuft and Needle Mint Head/Feet Motion Isolation
 Preview Graph
Saatva Classic (Plush Soft) Head/Feet Motion Isolation
 Compare in Graph Tool

Lumbar Motion Isolation  

 Preview Graph
Tuft and Needle Mint Lumbar Motion Isolation
 Preview Graph
Saatva Classic (Plush Soft) Lumbar Motion Isolation
 Compare in Graph Tool

Peak Acceleration @ Head/Feet 
 

0.49 g
3.55 g

Dissipation Time @ Head/Feet 
 

0.32 s
0.78 s

Peak Acceleration @ Lumbar 
 

2.42 g
3.96 g

Dissipation Time @ Lumbar 
 

0.23 s
0.69 s
Show Text 

Edge Support 
 

8.4
9.0

Naturalistic Loading Pad Video  

Naturalistic Loading Pad  

 Preview Graph
Tuft and Needle Mint Naturalistic Loading Pad
 Preview Graph
Saatva Classic (Plush Soft) Naturalistic Loading Pad
 Compare in Graph Tool

Small Platen  

 Preview Graph
Tuft and Needle Mint Small Platen
 Preview Graph
Saatva Classic (Plush Soft) Small Platen
 Compare in Graph Tool

Naturalistic Loading Pad Indentation 
 

133 mm
132 mm

Small Platen Indentation @ 0 mm From Edge 
 

169 mm
152 mm

Small Platen Indentation @ 150 mm From Edge 
 

152 mm
146 mm

Increased Indentation @ Mattress Edge 
 

17 mm
7 mm
Show Text 

Cooling 
 

8.4
8.3

Cooling Graph  

 Preview Graph
Tuft and Needle Mint Cooling Graph
 Preview Graph
Saatva Classic (Plush Soft) Cooling Graph
 Compare in Graph Tool

Energy Transferred Over 1st Hour 
 

74 kJ
58 kJ

Energy Transferred Over 8 Hours 
 

174 kJ
183 kJ
Show Text 
Components

Cover 
 

Cover Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Tuft and Needle Mint Cover Picture
Compare High-Res
Saatva Classic (Plush Soft) Cover Picture

Sleeping Surface Material 
 

Polyester, Elastane
Organic Cotton

Removable 
 

No
No

Machine Washable 
 

No
No
Show Text 

Edge Construction 
 

Edge Support Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Tuft and Needle Mint Edge Support Picture
Compare High-Res
Saatva Classic (Plush Soft) Edge Support Picture

Edge Component 
 

None
Polyfoam
Show Text 

Foam Layer Material 
 

Foam Layer Material Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Tuft and Needle Mint Foam Layer Material Picture
Compare High-Res
Saatva Classic (Plush Soft) Foam Layer Material Picture

Quilted Top Fill  

N/A
Polyfoam + Fiber Fill

Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

Polyfoam
N/A

Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

Polyfoam
Memory Foam

Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

Memory Foam
Polyfoam

Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

Memory Foam
Polyfoam

Transition Foam  

Polyfoam
Polyfoam

Support Foam  

Polyfoam
N/A
Show Text 

Foam Layer Mass Density 
 

6.3
5.7

Quilted Top Fill  

N/A
21 kg/m³ (1.3 lb/cu.ft.)

Quilted Top Fill Foam Density vs. Reference 
 

N/A
0.4

Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

56 kg/m³ (3.5 lb/cu.ft.)
N/A

Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet Density vs. Reference 
 

0.9
N/A

Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

56 kg/m³ (3.5 lb/cu.ft.)
35 kg/m³ (2.2 lb/cu.ft.)

Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar Density vs. Reference 
 

0.9
0.5

Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

43 kg/m³ (2.7 lb/cu.ft.)
24 kg/m³ (1.5 lb/cu.ft.)

Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet Density vs. Reference 
 

0.7
0.6

Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

43 kg/m³ (2.7 lb/cu.ft.)
24 kg/m³ (1.5 lb/cu.ft.)

Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar Density vs. Reference 
 

0.7
0.6

Transition Foam  

42 kg/m³ (2.6 lb/cu.ft.)
27 kg/m³ (1.7 lb/cu.ft.)

Transition Foam Density vs. Reference 
 

0.6
0.8

Support Foam  

30 kg/m³ (1.9 lb/cu.ft.)
N/A

Support Foam Density vs Reference 
 

1.0
N/A
Show Text 

Foam Layer Thickness 
 

Foam Layer Thickness Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Tuft and Needle Mint Foam Layer Thickness Picture
Compare High-Res
Saatva Classic (Plush Soft) Foam Layer Thickness Picture

Quilted Top 
 

N/A
6.5 cm (2.6")

Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

5.0 cm (2.0")
N/A

Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

5.0 cm (2.0")
1.0 cm (0.4")

Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

2.8 cm (1.1")
2.2 cm (0.9")

Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

2.8 cm (1.1")
2.2 cm (0.9")

Transition Foam  

5.0 cm (2.0")
2.4 cm (0.9")

Support Foam  

17.1 cm (6.7")
N/A
Show Text 

Spring Layer Dimensions 
 

Spring Layer Height Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Tuft and Needle Mint Spring Layer Height Picture
Compare High-Res
Saatva Classic (Plush Soft) Spring Layer Height Picture

Spring Layer Density Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Tuft and Needle Mint Spring Layer Density Picture
Compare High-Res
Saatva Classic (Plush Soft) Spring Layer Density Picture

Comfort Layer Height 
 

N/A
11.5 cm (4.5")

Comfort Layer Coil Density 
 

N/A
240 coils/m² (22 coils/ft²)

Comfort Layer Coil Gauge 
 

N/A
15 gauge

Support Layer Height 
 

N/A
14.5 cm (5.7")

Support Layer Coil Density 
 

N/A
132 coils/m² (12 coils/ft²)

Support Layer Coil Gauge @ Head/Feet 
 

N/A
13 gauge

Support Layer Coil Gauge @ Lumbar 
 

N/A
13 gauge
Show Text 

Foam Layer Firmness 
 

Comfort Layer IPD  

 Preview Graph
Tuft and Needle Mint Comfort Layer IPD
 Preview Graph
Saatva Classic (Plush Soft) Comfort Layer IPD
 Compare in Graph Tool

Transition & Support Layer IPD  

 Preview Graph
Tuft and Needle Mint Transition & Support Layer IPD
 Preview Graph
Saatva Classic (Plush Soft) Transition & Support Layer IPD
 Compare in Graph Tool

Quilted Top Fill 25% IPD 
 

N/A
1.5 kPa

Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet 25% IPD 
 

1.0 kPa
N/A

Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar 25% IPD 
 

1.0 kPa
1.7 kPa

Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet 25% IPD 
 

1.5 kPa
2.2 kPa

Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar 25% IPD 
 

1.5 kPa
2.2 kPa

Transition Foam 25% IPD 
 

1.5 kPa
5.0 kPa

Support Foam 25% IPD 
 

4.8 kPa
N/A
Show Text 

Spring Layer Firmness 
 

Comfort Layer Firmness  

Tuft and Needle Mint Comfort Layer Firmness
 Preview Graph
Saatva Classic (Plush Soft) Comfort Layer Firmness
 Compare in Graph Tool

Support Layer Firmness  

Tuft and Needle Mint Support Layer Firmness
 Preview Graph
Saatva Classic (Plush Soft) Support Layer Firmness
 Compare in Graph Tool

Spring Layer Firmness  

Normalized Comfort Layer Stiffness @ Head/Feet 
 

N/A
57 Pa/mm

Normalized Comfort Layer Stiffness @ Lumbar 
 

N/A
55 Pa/mm

Normalized Support Layer Stiffness @ Head/Feet 
 

N/A
91 Pa/mm

Normalized Support Layer Stiffness @ Lumbar 
 

N/A
96 Pa/mm
Show Text 

Foam Layer Resilience 
 

Foam Layer Resilience Video  

Quilted Top Fill  

N/A
44%

Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

25%
N/A

Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

25%
18%

Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

7%
47%

Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

7%
47%

Transition Foam  

20%
45%

Support Foam  

44%
N/A
Show Text 

Spring Layer Bounciness 
 

Comfort Spring Layer Bounciness Video  

Support Spring Layer Bounciness Video  

Comfort Spring Layer Maximum Rebound Height 
 

N/A
39.0 cm (15.4")

Support Spring Layer Maximum Rebound Height 
 

N/A
69.0 cm (27.2")
Show Text 

Check Price

Queen
Mint
SEE PRICE
Amazon.com
 
 
Queen (Plush Soft/14.5")
Classic
SEE PRICE
Saatva
Back to Top

Tuft and Needle Mint

Saatva Classic (Plush Soft)

Comments

  1. Comparison
 • Posted 1 month ago

Tuft and Needle Mint vs Saatva Classic (Plush Soft): Main Discussion

What do you think of these products? Let us know below.


Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Insiders have direct access to buying advice on our insider forum.

See All Home Discussions
 Share
0 
PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
No comments yet, refresh to see new ones
We make money directly from you via Insider access (which gives you access to extra features) and when you buy a product after clicking a link to a retailer. Learn more about how we work.
We buy our own products, just like you, mostly from the United States. When a product is discontinued or no longer popular, we sell the review units locally. See what products we currently have for sale.
© 2026 9298-5266 Quebec Inc. All Rights Reserved.