Products
Tested using Methodology v0.11
Updated May 12, 2026 01:32 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Tested using Methodology v0.10
Updated Apr 29, 2026 08:45 PM
SEE PRICE
Brooks
Weight
265.3 g (9.36 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
7.7 mm
Plate
Fiberglass Rods
Weight
263.7 g (9.30 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
6.9 mm
Plate
Plastic
Our Verdict
adidas Adizero Boston 12
Brooks Hyperion Max 2
The Brooks Hyperion Max 2 and the adidas Adizero Boston 12 are both plated super trainers, but each has distinct strengths. The adidas features full-length carbon rods and a firmer forefoot, making it more snappy and better suited for shorter races. The Brooks, on the other hand, uses a nylon plate combined with a softer, more cushioned midsole, offering a more forgiving and comfortable ride for your interval sessions.
Variants
- Adizero Boston 12 (Black/White/Carbon - (Men - US 9))
- Adizero Boston 12 (Black/Zero Metallic/Spark - (Men - US 9))
- Hyperion Max 2 (Black/Gold/Pink - (Men - US 9))
- Hyperion Max 2 (Cobalt/Green Gecko/Limpett - (Men - US 9))
Main Differences for
Marathon Racing
Marathon Racing
Threshold
Marathon Racing
6.8
7.1
Heel Compression Energy Return
4.2
6.7
Forefoot Stack Height
28.9 mm
29.8 mm
Plate
Fiberglass Rods
Plastic
Full Comparison
Design
Weight
5.8
5.9
Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Weight
265.3 g (9.36 oz)
263.7 g (9.30 oz)
Stack Heights
Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Stack Height
36.6 mm
36.7 mm
Forefoot Stack Height
28.9 mm
29.8 mm
Heel-To-Toe Drop
7.7 mm
6.9 mm
Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
7.0 mm
6.0 mm
External Shape
3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Outsole Heel Width
83 mm (3.2")
82 mm (3.2")
Outsole Arch Width
68 mm (2.7")
72 mm (2.8")
Outsole Forefoot Width
114 mm (4.5")
112 mm (4.4")
Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
2.26
2.23
Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
3.94
3.76
Internal Shape
3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Internal Length
272 mm (10.7")
273 mm (10.7")
Internal Heel Width
61 mm (2.4")
61 mm (2.4")
Internal Forefoot Width
93 mm (3.7")
91 mm (3.6")
Wide Sizing Available
Yes
No
Forefoot Fit: Width
7.1
10
Forefoot Width Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation
9.3 mm (0.365")
0.4 mm (0.017")
Toe TTS Deviation
-0.4 mm (-0.015")
0.4 mm (0.017")
Forefoot Fit: Height
7.2
5.4
Forefoot Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe TTS Deviation
-3.3 mm (-0.131")
-5.4 mm (-0.213")
Arch Fit: Width
7.6
6.6
Arch Fit Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Arch Width TTS Deviation
-3.9 mm (-0.152")
-5.2 mm (-0.203")
Length Fit
10
10
Toe Clearance Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Rocker Geometry
7.2
Heel Rocker Photo
Heel Spring
22 mm (0.9")
Heel Apex Position
23.3%
Heel Rocker Angle
17.4°
Forefoot Rocker Geometry
6.8
Forefoot Rocker Photo
Toe Spring
47 mm (1.9")
Toe Apex Position
65.0%
Forefoot Rocker Angle
24.1°
Other Features
Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Tongue Gusset Type
Semi-gusseted
Semi-gusseted
Plate
Fiberglass Rods
Plastic
Performance
Heel Compression Energy Return
4.2
6.7
Heel Compression Video
Heel Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Heel Energy Return
70.8%
75.2%
Forefoot Compression Energy Return
7.2
7.3
Forefoot Compression Video
Forefoot Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Energy Return
76.8%
77.1%
Heel Cushioning
6.1
7.2
Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 550N
2.70 J
3.32 J
Energy Absorbed At 1100N
7.81 J
9.04 J
Energy Absorbed At 1900N
13.87 J
15.09 J
Forefoot Cushioning
6.7
7.1
Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 800N
3.95 J
4.17 J
Energy Absorbed At 1300N
7.26 J
7.60 J
Energy Absorbed At 2050N
11.02 J
11.44 J
Heel Firmness
6.4
5.8
Heel Firmness
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 550N
64.5 N/mm
50.4 N/mm
Firmness At 1100N
123.6 N/mm
124.4 N/mm
Firmness At 1900N
257.1 N/mm
270.8 N/mm
Forefoot Firmness
8.2
8.0
Forefoot Firmness
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 800N
113.4 N/mm
109.3 N/mm
Firmness At 1300N
217.7 N/mm
211.0 N/mm
Firmness At 2050N
427.8 N/mm
417.1 N/mm
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
6.3
6.3
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 10km
6.88 J
6.90 J
Energy Absorbed At 20km
6.71 J
6.72 J
Energy Absorbed At 30km
6.61 J
6.61 J
Energy Absorbed At 40km
6.52 J
6.54 J
Rocker Stiffness
7.5
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Video
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph
Preview Graph
Force To Flatten The Rocker
101 N
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
7.2
Forefoot Bending Video
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
66.3%
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
8.2
Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture
Forefoot Bending Resistance
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
16.9 N/mm
Forefoot Bending Force
405 N
To access
Become a member
unlimited full product reviews,
product prices, and
other exclusive site features
adidas Adizero Boston 12
Brooks Hyperion Max 2
Comments
adidas Adizero Boston 12 vs Brooks Hyperion Max 2: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.