Products
Tested using Methodology v0.12
Updated Jun 16, 2026 05:48 PM
SEE PRICE
DicksSportingGoods.com
Tested using Methodology v0.12
Updated Jun 16, 2026 05:45 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Weight
257.5 g (9.08 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
8.3 mm
Plate
None
Weight
292.5 g (10.32 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
10.2 mm
Plate
None
Our Verdict
HOKA Clifton 9
adidas Supernova Rise
The HOKA Clifton 9 and the adidas Supernova Rise are both well-rounded daily trainers. The HOKA is more cushioned than the adidas, with a higher stack height and a softer feel underfoot. It's also lighter than the adidas. However, the adidas shoe delivers significantly better energy return, making it the preferred choice if you like a bouncier experience for your daily miles.
Variants
- Clifton 9 (Black/Black - (Women - US 7))
- Clifton 9 (Black/Rose Gold - (Women - US 7))
- Supernova Rise (Better Scarlet/Core Black/Green Spar - (Men - US 9))
- Supernova Rise (Core Black/Grey Five/Green Spark - (Men - US 9))
Main Differences for
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Threshold
Half/Full Marathon Racing
6.5
5.4
Forefoot Stack Height
30.9 mm
24.8 mm
Forefoot Compression Energy Return
2.4
7.1
Weight
6.1
4.7
Heel Stack Height
39.2 mm
35.0 mm
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
3.6
6.4
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
6.9
5.1
Heel Compression Energy Return
2.2
7.3
Full Comparison
Design
Weight
6.1
4.7
Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Weight
257.5 g (9.08 oz)
292.5 g (10.32 oz)
Stack Heights
Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Stack Height
39.2 mm
35.0 mm
Forefoot Stack Height
30.9 mm
24.8 mm
Heel-To-Toe Drop
8.3 mm
10.2 mm
Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
5.0 mm
10.0 mm
External Shape
3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Outsole Heel Width
89 mm (3.5")
86 mm (3.4")
Outsole Arch Width
84 mm (3.3")
73 mm (2.9")
Outsole Forefoot Width
107 mm (4.2")
112 mm (4.4")
Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
2.27
2.45
Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
3.47
4.51
Internal Shape
3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Internal Length
274 mm (10.8")
276 mm (10.9")
Internal Heel Width
58 mm (2.3")
60 mm (2.4")
Internal Forefoot Width
87 mm (3.4")
96 mm (3.8")
Wide Sizing Available
Yes
Yes
Forefoot Fit: Width
9.6
9.4
Forefoot Width Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation
-0.4 mm (-0.014")
3.3 mm (0.130")
Toe TTS Deviation
-1.9 mm (-0.075")
1.6 mm (0.064")
Forefoot Fit: Height
10
8.4
Forefoot Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe TTS Deviation
0.0 mm (-0.002")
-2.1 mm (-0.082")
Arch Fit: Width
9.3
7.3
Arch Fit Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Arch Width TTS Deviation
-1.4 mm (-0.056")
-4.2 mm (-0.166")
Length Fit
10
10
Toe Clearance Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Rocker Geometry
8.0
6.9
Heel Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Spring
25 mm (1.0")
24 mm (0.9")
Heel Apex Position
19.2%
31.4%
Heel Rocker Angle
24.1°
14.2°
Forefoot Rocker Geometry
5.8
7.2
Forefoot Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe Spring
40 mm (1.6")
50 mm (2.0")
Toe Apex Position
62.2%
60.4%
Forefoot Rocker Angle
20.0°
22.6°
Other Features
Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Tongue Gusset Type
Non-gusseted
Non-gusseted
Plate
None
None
Performance
Heel Compression Energy Return
2.2
7.3
Heel Compression Video
Heel Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Heel Energy Return
68.1%
77.4%
Forefoot Compression Energy Return
2.4
7.1
Forefoot Compression Video
Forefoot Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Energy Return
68.6%
76.7%
Heel Cushioning
7.6
6.2
Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 550N
3.11 J
2.77 J
Energy Absorbed At 1100N
9.51 J
7.70 J
Energy Absorbed At 1900N
16.72 J
13.99 J
Forefoot Cushioning
7.9
5.6
Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 800N
4.51 J
3.54 J
Energy Absorbed At 1300N
8.58 J
6.05 J
Energy Absorbed At 2050N
13.19 J
9.08 J
Heel Firmness
8.5
8.9
Heel Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 550N
50.1 N/mm
50.9 N/mm
Firmness At 1100N
57.8 N/mm
64.8 N/mm
Firmness At 1900N
79.1 N/mm
89.1 N/mm
Forefoot Firmness
8.6
9.3
Forefoot Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 800N
65.2 N/mm
71.9 N/mm
Firmness At 1300N
80.0 N/mm
95.7 N/mm
Firmness At 2050N
107 N/mm
133 N/mm
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
6.9
5.1
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 10km
7.60 J
5.62 J
Energy Absorbed At 20km
7.34 J
5.46 J
Energy Absorbed At 30km
7.18 J
5.35 J
Energy Absorbed At 40km
7.05 J
5.26 J
Rocker Stiffness
6.1
5.9
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Video
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Force To Flatten The Rocker
63 N
59 N
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
3.6
6.4
Forefoot Bending Video
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
52.0%
61.9%
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
7.8
7.1
Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Bending Resistance
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
14.0 N/mm
12.5 N/mm
Forefoot Bending Force
364 N
269 N
To access
Become a member
unlimited full product reviews,
product prices, and
other exclusive site features
HOKA Clifton 9
adidas Supernova Rise
Comments
HOKA Clifton 9 vs adidas Supernova Rise: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.