ASICS MAGIC SPEED 5 vs ANTA C202 7

Which Running Shoe Is Better?

Products

ASICS MAGIC SPEED 5
ANTA C202 7

Tested using Methodology v0.10

Updated Mar 16, 2026 07:56 PM

SEE PRICE
Asics.com

Tested using Methodology v0.10

Updated Mar 17, 2026 06:54 PM

SEE PRICE
ANTA
ASICS MAGIC SPEED 5 Picture

Track

ANTA C202 7 Picture

Track

Our Verdict

ASICS MAGIC SPEED 5

ANTA C202 7

The ANTA C202 7 and the ASICS MAGIC SPEED 5 are both super trainers with partial carbon plates, but they have a few major differences. The ANTA C202 7 is the more cushioned and more absorbent option, with a higher stack and a midsole that returns a touch more energy, giving it a slightly more protective and comfort-oriented feel for fast efforts. Its plate runs from the forefoot and extends farther back. The ASICS MAGIC SPEED 5 is the more minimal and more nimble of the two, with a lighter build and a more stripped-back feel that makes it come across as especially efficient when you want quicker turnover. Its plate sits in a more central position under the midfoot.

0 

Variants

  • MAGIC SPEED 5 (Vital Green/Carrier Grey - (Men - US 9))
  • MAGIC SPEED 5 (Vital Green/Carrier Grey - (Women - US 7))
  • C202 7 (Black/Silver - (Men - US 9))
  • C202 7 (Black/Silver - (Women - US 7))

Main Differences for
Marathon Racing

Threshold 

0.10

Marathon Racing 
 

7.6
8.1

Heel Stack Height 
 

35.9 mm
37.8 mm

Forefoot Stack Height 
 

29.0 mm
30.3 mm

Weight  

8.2
7.7

Full Comparison

Design

Weight  

8.2
7.7

Right Shoe Weight Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
ASICS MAGIC SPEED 5 Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
ANTA C202 7 Right Shoe Weight Photo

Left Shoe Weight Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
ASICS MAGIC SPEED 5 Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
ANTA C202 7 Left Shoe Weight Photo

Weight 
 

199.5 g (7.04 oz)
212.9 g (7.51 oz)
Show Text 

Stack Heights 
 

Stack Height Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
ASICS MAGIC SPEED 5 Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
ANTA C202 7 Stack Height Photo

Heel Stack Height 
 

35.9 mm
37.8 mm

Forefoot Stack Height 
 

29.0 mm
30.3 mm

Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

6.9 mm
7.5 mm

Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

7.0 mm
8.0 mm
Show Text 

External Shape 
 

3D Model Full Shoe  

Preview 3D
ASICS MAGIC SPEED 5 3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
ANTA C202 7 3D Model Full Shoe

Outsole Heel Width 
 

76 mm (3.0")
84 mm (3.3")

Outsole Arch Width 
 

65 mm (2.6")
64 mm (2.5")

Outsole Forefoot Width 
 

101 mm (4.0")
108 mm (4.3")

Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

2.12
2.22

Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

3.48
3.56

Internal Shape 
 

3D Model Internal  

Preview 3D
ASICS MAGIC SPEED 5 3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
ANTA C202 7 3D Model Internal

Internal Length 
 

268 mm (10.6")
272 mm (10.7")

Internal Heel Width 
 

56 mm (2.2")
64 mm (2.5")

Internal Forefoot Width 
 

88 mm (3.5")
91 mm (3.6")

Wide Sizing Available 
 

No
No

Forefoot Fit: Width 
 

9.6
9.1

Forefoot Width Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
ASICS MAGIC SPEED 5 Forefoot Width Photo
Compare High-Res
ANTA C202 7 Forefoot Width Photo

Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation 
 

0.7 mm (0.028")
4.1 mm (0.163")

Toe TTS Deviation 
 

-1.9 mm (-0.074")
1.3 mm (0.049")

Forefoot Fit: Height 
 

6.6
7.9

Forefoot Height Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
ASICS MAGIC SPEED 5 Forefoot Height Photo
Compare High-Res
ANTA C202 7 Forefoot Height Photo

Toe TTS Deviation 
 

-4.1 mm (-0.161")
-2.6 mm (-0.100")

Arch Fit: Width 
 

10
4.7

Arch Fit Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
ASICS MAGIC SPEED 5 Arch Fit Photo
Compare High-Res
ANTA C202 7 Arch Fit Photo

Arch Width TTS Deviation 
 

0.4 mm (0.017")
-7.3 mm (-0.285")

Length Fit 
 

10
7.0

Toe Clearance Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
ASICS MAGIC SPEED 5 Toe Clearance Photo
Compare High-Res
ANTA C202 7 Toe Clearance Photo

Other Features  

Other Features Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
ASICS MAGIC SPEED 5 Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
ANTA C202 7 Other Features Photo

Tongue Gusset Type 
 

Non-gusseted
Non-gusseted

Plate 
 

Carbon Fiber
Carbon Fiber
Performance

Heel Energy Return 
 

7.0
7.2

Heel Compression Video  

Heel Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
ASICS MAGIC SPEED 5 Heel Energy Return
 Preview Graph
ANTA C202 7 Heel Energy Return

Heel Energy Return 
 

76.2%
76.7%
Show Text 

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

7.5
7.6

Forefoot Compression Video  

Forefoot Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
ASICS MAGIC SPEED 5 Forefoot Energy Return
 Preview Graph
ANTA C202 7 Forefoot Energy Return

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

78.3%
78.6%
Show Text 

Heel Cushioning 
 

8.0
8.2

Heel Cushioning Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
ASICS MAGIC SPEED 5 Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
ANTA C202 7 Heel Cushioning Picture

Heel Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
ASICS MAGIC SPEED 5 Heel Cushioning
 Preview Graph
ANTA C202 7 Heel Cushioning

Energy Absorbed At 550N 
 

3.94 J
4.21 J

Energy Absorbed At 1100N 
 

9.68 J
9.90 J

Energy Absorbed At 1900N 
 

15.57 J
15.90 J
Show Text 

Forefoot Cushioning 
 

7.4
7.9

Forefoot Cushioning Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
ASICS MAGIC SPEED 5 Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
ANTA C202 7 Forefoot Cushioning Picture

Forefoot Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
ASICS MAGIC SPEED 5 Forefoot Cushioning
 Preview Graph
ANTA C202 7 Forefoot Cushioning

Energy Absorbed At 800N 
 

4.69 J
4.94 J

Energy Absorbed At 1300N 
 

7.90 J
8.46 J

Energy Absorbed At 2050N 
 

11.38 J
12.50 J
Show Text 

Heel Firmness 
 

5.7
5.6

Heel Firmness  

 Preview Graph
ASICS MAGIC SPEED 5 Heel Firmness
 Preview Graph
ANTA C202 7 Heel Firmness

Firmness At 550N 
 

47.6 N/mm
47.2 N/mm

Firmness At 1100N 
 

122.9 N/mm
123.6 N/mm

Firmness At 1900N 
 

282.6 N/mm
270.4 N/mm
Show Text 

Forefoot Firmness 
 

8.4
8.0

Forefoot Firmness  

 Preview Graph
ASICS MAGIC SPEED 5 Forefoot Firmness
 Preview Graph
ANTA C202 7 Forefoot Firmness

Firmness At 800N 
 

110.2 N/mm
107.9 N/mm

Firmness At 1300N 
 

238.3 N/mm
211.6 N/mm

Firmness At 2050N 
 

495.2 N/mm
413.0 N/mm
Show Text 

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning 
 

6.7
7.4

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
ASICS MAGIC SPEED 5 Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
 Preview Graph
ANTA C202 7 Forefoot Long Run Cushioning

Energy Absorbed At 10km 
 

7.28 J
8.03 J

Energy Absorbed At 20km 
 

7.14 J
7.89 J

Energy Absorbed At 30km 
 

7.06 J
7.79 J

Energy Absorbed At 40km 
 

6.99 J
7.71 J
Show Text 

ASICS MAGIC SPEED 5

ANTA C202 7

Comments

  1. Comparison

ASICS MAGIC SPEED 5 vs ANTA C202 7: Main Discussion

What do you think of these products? Let us know below.


Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.

PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
No comments yet, refresh to see new ones