Products
Tested using Methodology v0.15
Updated Jul 16, 2026 02:48 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Tested using Methodology v0.10
Updated Jul 24, 2026 05:28 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Heel Stack Height
47.9 mm
Weight
314.3 g (11.09 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
6.9 mm
Plate
None
Heel Stack Height
40.4 mm
Weight
241.9 g (8.53 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
6.9 mm
Plate
None
Our Verdict
Brooks Glycerin Max 2
Mizuno Neo Zen 2
The Mizuno Neo Zen 2 and Brooks Glycerin Max 2 are both protective shoes for daily miles, and they have the same heel-to-toe drop, but they feel quite different on foot. The Brooks is the more cushioned option, with a higher stack and a softer, more comfort-first ride, but it also feels heavier and less stable, and its upper is more conventional. The Mizuno is lighter (which makes it feel more nimble) and more stable.
Variants
- Glycerin Max 2 (Grey/Coconut/Metallic - (Women - US 7))
- Glycerin Max 2 (Orange/Beacon Blue/Nightlife - (Men - US 9))
- Neo Zen 2 (Black Sand/White - (Women - US 7))
- Neo Zen 2 (Black/White - (Men - US 9))
Main Differences for
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Threshold
Half/Full Marathon Racing
6.3
6.4
Weight
3.7
6.7
Plate
None
None
Forefoot Compression Energy Return
3.1
3.6
Heel Firmness
7.7
4.6
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
8.4
7.5
Full Comparison
Design
Weight
3.7
6.7
Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Weight
314.3 g (11.09 oz)
241.9 g (8.53 oz)
Stack Heights
Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Stack Height
47.9 mm
40.4 mm
Forefoot Stack Height
41.0 mm
33.5 mm
Heel-To-Toe Drop
6.9 mm
6.9 mm
Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
6.0 mm
6.0 mm
External Shape
3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Outsole Heel Width
88 mm (3.5")
96 mm (3.8")
Outsole Arch Width
85 mm (3.4")
84 mm (3.3")
Outsole Forefoot Width
114 mm (4.5")
117 mm (4.6")
Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
1.84
2.38
Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
2.78
3.49
Internal Shape
3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Internal Length
280 mm (11.0")
278 mm (10.9")
Internal Heel Width
66 mm (2.6")
62 mm (2.4")
Internal Forefoot Width
92 mm (3.6")
89 mm (3.5")
Wide Sizing Available
No
No
Forefoot Fit: Width
9.5
7.2
Forefoot Width Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation
1.2 mm (0.047")
-3.4 mm (-0.135")
Toe TTS Deviation
5.3 mm (0.208")
-5.3 mm (-0.207")
Forefoot Fit: Height
8.1
2.7
Forefoot Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe TTS Deviation
-2.4 mm (-0.095")
-8.6 mm (-0.340")
Arch Fit: Width
9.9
8.2
Arch Fit Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Arch Width TTS Deviation
1.2 mm (0.047")
-3.1 mm (-0.122")
Length Fit
10
10
Toe Clearance Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Rocker Geometry
7.5
Heel Rocker Photo
Heel Spring
24 mm (0.9")
Heel Apex Position
24.7%
Heel Rocker Angle
18.2°
Forefoot Rocker Geometry
7.8
Forefoot Rocker Photo
Toe Spring
55 mm (2.2")
Toe Apex Position
62.8%
Forefoot Rocker Angle
26.6°
Foam
Primary Foam Picture
Secondary Foam Picture
Primary Foam Name
DNA TUNED
Primary Foam Type
Unknown
Secondary Foam Name
N/A
Secondary Foam Type
N/A
Laces
Laces Picture
Lace Type
Round
Width
5.5 mm (0.2")
Thickness
3.2 mm (0.1")
Stretch
18.5%
Other Features
Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Tongue Gusset Type
Non-gusseted
Semi-gusseted
Plate
None
None
Performance
Heel Compression Energy Return
2.0
2.2
Heel Compression Video
Heel Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Heel Energy Return
67.8%
68.2%
Forefoot Compression Energy Return
3.1
3.6
Forefoot Compression Video
Forefoot Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Energy Return
69.6%
70.2%
Heel Cushioning
8.5
8.1
Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 550N
3.47 J
3.45 J
Energy Absorbed At 1100N
10.81 J
10.21 J
Energy Absorbed At 1900N
19.55 J
17.63 J
Forefoot Cushioning
9.0
8.2
Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 800N
5.33 J
4.97 J
Energy Absorbed At 1300N
10.19 J
8.90 J
Energy Absorbed At 2050N
15.84 J
13.30 J
Heel Firmness
7.7
4.6
Heel Firmness
Preview Graph
Heel Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 550N
47.8 N/mm
45.1 N/mm
Firmness At 1100N
53.1 N/mm
99.9 N/mm
Firmness At 1900N
71.0 N/mm
206.3 N/mm
Forefoot Firmness
7.5
7.2
Forefoot Firmness
Preview Graph
Forefoot Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 800N
58.8 N/mm
91.9 N/mm
Firmness At 1300N
70.8 N/mm
187.2 N/mm
Firmness At 2050N
94 N/mm
340.6 N/mm
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
8.4
7.5
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 10km
9.41 J
8.14 J
Energy Absorbed At 20km
9.15 J
7.95 J
Energy Absorbed At 30km
9.02 J
7.85 J
Energy Absorbed At 40km
8.93 J
7.76 J
Rocker Stiffness
7.6
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Video
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph
Preview Graph
Force To Flatten The Rocker
105 N
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
4.9
Forefoot Bending Video
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
56.5%
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
8.1
Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture
Forefoot Bending Resistance
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
15.9 N/mm
Forefoot Bending Force
381 N
Heel Compression Depth
5.9
Heel Compression Graph
Preview Graph
Heel Compression At 550N
11.5 mm
Heel Compression At 1100N
20.7 mm
Heel Compression At 1900N
26.8 mm
Forefoot Compression Depth
6.2
Forefoot Compression Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Compression At 800N
13.6 mm
Forefoot Compression At 1300N
18.4 mm
Forefoot Compression At 2050N
21.8 mm
To access
Become a member
unlimited full product reviews,
product prices, and
other exclusive site features
Brooks Glycerin Max 2
Mizuno Neo Zen 2
Comments
Brooks Glycerin Max 2 vs Mizuno Neo Zen 2: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.