Brooks Glycerin Max vs HOKA Bondi 9

Which Running Shoe Is Better?

Products

Brooks Glycerin Max
HOKA Bondi 9

Tested using Methodology v0.9

Updated Dec 16, 2025 04:17 PM

SEE PRICE
Brooks

Tested using Methodology v0.9

Updated Nov 27, 2025 07:38 PM

SEE PRICE
Hoka.com

Our Verdict

Brooks Glycerin Max

HOKA Bondi 9

The HOKA Bondi 9 and the Brooks Glycerin Max both shine in protecting runners during long distances. With its DNA-Tuned foam midsole, the Brooks shoe provides runners with excellent cushioning, delivering a soft ride as they cruise through their run. The HOKA, however, has a firmer underfoot feel for cruising due to its supercritical EVA foam. On the contrary, the Brooks provides the runner with a plush ride but offers terrible energy return. Meanwhile, with its updated midsole composition, the HOKA provides better energy return and offers a more responsive, fun ride. Depending on the runner's preferences, both running shoes offer comfort on easy, long, or recovery miles without sacrificing the protection they need.

0 

Variants

  • Glycerin Max (Almond Peach/London Fog/White - (Men - US 9))
  • Glycerin Max (Aurora Black/Ebony - (Men - US 9))
  • Bondi 9 (Asphalt Grey/Gravel - (Men - US 9))
  • Bondi 9 (Aster Flower/Starlight Glow - (Women - US 7))

Main Differences for
Marathon Racing

Threshold 

0.10

Marathon Racing 
 

5.4
6.8

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

2.1
6.8

Heel Energy Return 
 

1.7
6.4

Full Comparison

Design

Weight  

4.2
4.5

Right Shoe Weight Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Brooks Glycerin Max Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
HOKA Bondi 9 Right Shoe Weight Photo

Left Shoe Weight Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Brooks Glycerin Max Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
HOKA Bondi 9 Left Shoe Weight Photo

Weight 
 

304.9 g (10.75 oz)
297.8 g (10.50 oz)
Show Text 

Stack Heights 
 

Stack Height Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Brooks Glycerin Max Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
HOKA Bondi 9 Stack Height Photo

Heel Stack Height 
 

47.4 mm
41.5 mm

Forefoot Stack Height 
 

42.1 mm
34.5 mm

Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

5.3 mm
7.0 mm

Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

6.0 mm
5.0 mm

External Shape 
 

3D Model Full Shoe  

Preview 3D
Brooks Glycerin Max 3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
HOKA Bondi 9 3D Model Full Shoe

Outsole Heel Width 
 

88 mm (3.5")
99 mm (3.9")

Outsole Arch Width 
 

85 mm (3.3")
87 mm (3.4")

Outsole Forefoot Width 
 

114 mm (4.5")
120 mm (4.7")

Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

1.86
2.39

Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

2.71
3.48
Show Text 

Internal Shape 
 

3D Model Internal  

Preview 3D
Brooks Glycerin Max 3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
HOKA Bondi 9 3D Model Internal

Internal Length 
 

275 mm (10.8")
277 mm (10.9")

Internal Heel Width 
 

66 mm (2.6")
64 mm (2.5")

Internal Forefoot Width 
 

94 mm (3.7")
94 mm (3.7")

Wide Sizing Available 
 

No
Yes
Show Text 

Other Features  

Other Features Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Brooks Glycerin Max Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
HOKA Bondi 9 Other Features Photo

Tongue Gusset Type 
 

Non-gusseted
Non-gusseted

Plate 
 

None
None
Performance

Heel Energy Return 
 

1.7
6.4

Heel Compression Video  

Heel Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
Brooks Glycerin Max Heel Energy Return
 Preview Graph
HOKA Bondi 9 Heel Energy Return

Heel Energy Return 
 

67.1%
74.3%
Show Text 

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

2.1
6.8

Forefoot Compression Video  

Forefoot Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
Brooks Glycerin Max Forefoot Energy Return
 Preview Graph
HOKA Bondi 9 Forefoot Energy Return

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

68.1%
75.4%
Show Text 

Heel Cushioning 
 

8.2
8.8

Heel Cushioning Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Brooks Glycerin Max Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
HOKA Bondi 9 Heel Cushioning Picture

Heel Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
Brooks Glycerin Max Heel Cushioning
 Preview Graph
HOKA Bondi 9 Heel Cushioning

Energy Absorbed At 550N 
 

3.29 J
3.81 J

Energy Absorbed At 1100N 
 

10.39 J
11.03 J

Energy Absorbed At 1900N 
 

18.78 J
19.35 J
Show Text 

Forefoot Cushioning 
 

9.1
8.9

Forefoot Cushioning Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Brooks Glycerin Max Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
HOKA Bondi 9 Forefoot Cushioning Picture

Forefoot Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
Brooks Glycerin Max Forefoot Cushioning
 Preview Graph
HOKA Bondi 9 Forefoot Cushioning

Energy Absorbed At 800N 
 

5.21 J
5.77 J

Energy Absorbed At 1300N 
 

10.40 J
10.02 J

Energy Absorbed At 2050N 
 

16.39 J
14.47 J
Show Text 

Heel Firmness 
 

4.2
4.3

Heel Firmness  

 Preview Graph
Brooks Glycerin Max Heel Firmness
 Preview Graph
HOKA Bondi 9 Heel Firmness

Firmness At 550N 
 

45.7 N/mm
45.2 N/mm

Firmness At 1100N 
 

91.3 N/mm
88.7 N/mm

Firmness At 1900N 
 

178.3 N/mm
192.9 N/mm
Show Text 

Forefoot Firmness 
 

5.8
7.2

Forefoot Firmness  

 Preview Graph
Brooks Glycerin Max Forefoot Firmness
 Preview Graph
HOKA Bondi 9 Forefoot Firmness

Firmness At 800N 
 

74.8 N/mm
83.5 N/mm

Firmness At 1300N 
 

138.2 N/mm
177.4 N/mm

Firmness At 2050N 
 

257.3 N/mm
379.1 N/mm
Show Text 

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning 
 

8.5
8.3

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
Brooks Glycerin Max Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
 Preview Graph
HOKA Bondi 9 Forefoot Long Run Cushioning

Energy Absorbed At 10km 
 

9.68 J
9.31 J

Energy Absorbed At 20km 
 

9.41 J
9.03 J

Energy Absorbed At 30km 
 

9.25 J
8.86 J

Energy Absorbed At 40km 
 

9.14 J
8.72 J

Brooks Glycerin Max

HOKA Bondi 9

Comments

  1. Comparison

Brooks Glycerin Max vs HOKA Bondi 9: Main Discussion

What do you think of these products? Let us know below.


Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Insiders have direct access to buying advice on our insider forum.

PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
No comments yet, refresh to see new ones