Products
Tested using Methodology v0.12
Updated Jun 24, 2026 02:22 PM
SEARCH
DicksSportingGoods.com
Tested using Methodology v0.12
Updated Jun 29, 2026 02:03 PM
SEARCH
DicksSportingGoods.com
Weight
192.5 g (6.79 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
9.4 mm
Plate
None
Weight
246.0 g (8.68 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
10.0 mm
Plate
Carbon Fiber
Our Verdict
Dynafish Xiaonian
XTEP 360X 2.0
The Dynafish Xiaonian and XTEP 360X 2.0 are two intriguing running shoes from different Chinese brands that offer very different experiences. The Dynafish is an unplated, deeply cushioned performance trainer that has the versatility to cover a range of paces and distances. The XTEP is a firmer, carbon-plated trainer that is lower-stacked but heavier. Its cushioning is much less effective, so it's really only a viable option for shorter runs. Overall, the Xiaonian is the more well-rounded shoe.
Variants
- Xiaonian (Black - (Men - US 9))
- Xiaonian (Burning Sun - (Women - US 7))
- 360X 2.0 (Speed Blue - (Men - US 9))
- 360X 2.0 (Speed Blue - (Women - US 7))
Main Differences for
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Threshold
Half/Full Marathon Racing
8.4
6.9
Weight
8.4
6.6
Forefoot Stack Height
31.2 mm
27.1 mm
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
8.5
6.0
Heel Stack Height
40.6 mm
37.1 mm
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
5.9
8.7
Full Comparison
Design
Weight
8.4
6.6
Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Weight
192.5 g (6.79 oz)
246.0 g (8.68 oz)
Stack Heights
Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Stack Height
40.6 mm
37.1 mm
Forefoot Stack Height
31.2 mm
27.1 mm
Heel-To-Toe Drop
9.4 mm
10.0 mm
Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
7.0 mm
9.0 mm
External Shape
3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Outsole Heel Width
97 mm (3.8")
81 mm (3.2")
Outsole Arch Width
80 mm (3.1")
54 mm (2.1")
Outsole Forefoot Width
118 mm (4.7")
110 mm (4.3")
Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
2.39
2.18
Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
3.78
4.05
Internal Shape
3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Internal Length
275 mm (10.8")
278 mm (10.9")
Internal Heel Width
58 mm (2.3")
62 mm (2.4")
Internal Forefoot Width
94 mm (3.7")
94 mm (3.7")
Wide Sizing Available
No
No
Forefoot Fit: Width
8.9
9.4
Forefoot Width Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation
4.1 mm (0.160")
2.6 mm (0.102")
Toe TTS Deviation
-1.4 mm (-0.056")
3.4 mm (0.133")
Forefoot Fit: Height
8.2
3.8
Forefoot Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe TTS Deviation
-2.3 mm (-0.092")
-7.2 mm (-0.283")
Arch Fit: Width
9.8
8.9
Arch Fit Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Arch Width TTS Deviation
-0.6 mm (-0.023")
-2.0 mm (-0.079")
Length Fit
10
10
Toe Clearance Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Rocker Geometry
6.6
8.3
Heel Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Spring
21 mm (0.8")
32 mm (1.3")
Heel Apex Position
29.8%
16.6%
Heel Rocker Angle
13.7°
33.7°
Forefoot Rocker Geometry
8.3
6.7
Forefoot Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe Spring
62 mm (2.4")
46 mm (1.8")
Toe Apex Position
58.5%
62.1%
Forefoot Rocker Angle
27.3°
22.7°
Other Features
Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Tongue Gusset Type
Semi-gusseted
Non-gusseted
Plate
None
Carbon Fiber
Performance
Heel Compression Energy Return
8.0
7.8
Heel Compression Video
Heel Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Heel Energy Return
80.8%
79.6%
Forefoot Compression Energy Return
8.6
7.7
Forefoot Compression Video
Forefoot Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Energy Return
84.3%
79.4%
Heel Cushioning
8.8
7.2
Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 550N
4.08 J
3.15 J
Energy Absorbed At 1100N
11.05 J
9.10 J
Energy Absorbed At 1900N
18.34 J
15.02 J
Forefoot Cushioning
9.1
6.5
Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 800N
5.83 J
3.89 J
Energy Absorbed At 1300N
10.36 J
7.02 J
Energy Absorbed At 2050N
15.20 J
10.60 J
Heel Firmness
5.9
9.7
Heel Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 550N
36.7 N/mm
55.8 N/mm
Firmness At 1100N
46.1 N/mm
117.0 N/mm
Firmness At 1900N
65.6 N/mm
279.3 N/mm
Forefoot Firmness
5.8
10
Forefoot Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 800N
49.6 N/mm
118.5 N/mm
Firmness At 1300N
63.2 N/mm
229.3 N/mm
Firmness At 2050N
87 N/mm
462 N/mm
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
8.5
6.0
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 10km
9.52 J
6.59 J
Energy Absorbed At 20km
9.29 J
6.44 J
Energy Absorbed At 30km
9.15 J
6.33 J
Energy Absorbed At 40km
9.04 J
6.24 J
Rocker Stiffness
7.5
7.7
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Video
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Force To Flatten The Rocker
101 N
109 N
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
7.9
8.2
Forefoot Bending Video
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
70.5%
73.5%
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
5.9
8.7
Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Bending Resistance
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
6.9 N/mm
24.3 N/mm
Forefoot Bending Force
243 N
401 N
To access
Become a member
unlimited full product reviews,
product prices, and
other exclusive site features
Dynafish Xiaonian
XTEP 360X 2.0
Comments
Dynafish Xiaonian vs XTEP 360X 2.0: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.