Products
Tested using Methodology v0.15
Updated Sep 18, 2026 06:15 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Tested using Methodology v0.15
Updated Oct 06, 2026 05:31 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Heel Stack Height
39.7 mm
Weight
257.3 g (9.08 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
10.1 mm
Plate
None
Heel Stack Height
38.2 mm
Weight
280.9 g (9.91 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
10.7 mm
Plate
None
Our Verdict
HOKA Rincon 5
Saucony Procyon Max
The HOKA Rincon 5 and Saucony Procyon Max sit in the same price category but take slightly different approaches. The Rincon 5 has better cushioning, especially in the heel, but it has almost no bounce or energy return. The Procyon Max compromises a bit on cushioning, but at least has some snappiness and energy return. If you like a softer feel underfoot and aren't planning on doing any speedy workouts, the Rincon is the better choice. If you want the more stable, slightly peppier shoe, the Procyon Max is better.
Variants
- Rincon 5 (Alabaster/Tangerine Glow - (Women - US 7))
- Rincon 5 (Black/Black - (Men - US 9))
- Procyon Max (Black/Fizz - (Women - US 7))
- Procyon Max (Black/White - (Men - US 9))
Main Differences for
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Threshold
Half/Full Marathon Racing
6.1
6.2
Forefoot Compression Energy Return
1.3
6.7
Forefoot Stack Height
29.6 mm
27.5 mm
Weight
6.1
5.2
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
2.4
4.1
Full Comparison
Design
Weight
6.1
5.2
Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Weight
257.3 g (9.08 oz)
280.9 g (9.91 oz)
Stack Heights
Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Stack Height
39.7 mm
38.2 mm
Forefoot Stack Height
29.6 mm
27.5 mm
Heel-To-Toe Drop
10.1 mm
10.7 mm
Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
8.0 mm
6.0 mm
External Shape
3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Outsole Heel Width
93 mm (3.7")
103 mm (4.1")
Outsole Arch Width
82 mm (3.2")
85 mm (3.3")
Outsole Forefoot Width
116 mm (4.6")
121 mm (4.8")
Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
2.34
4.40
Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
3.92
2.70
Internal Shape
3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Internal Length
278 mm (10.9")
278 mm (10.9")
Internal Heel Width
58 mm (2.3")
60 mm (2.4")
Internal Forefoot Width
96 mm (3.8")
96 mm (3.8")
Wide Sizing Available
Yes
Yes
Forefoot Fit: Width
9.0
8.6
Forefoot Width Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation
2.4 mm (0.094")
2.8 mm (0.108")
Toe TTS Deviation
-3.0 mm (-0.117")
-3.7 mm (-0.145")
Forefoot Fit: Height
7.6
9.9
Forefoot Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe TTS Deviation
-2.9 mm (-0.115")
-0.4 mm (-0.017")
Arch Fit: Width
9.7
9.2
Arch Fit Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Arch Width TTS Deviation
3.2 mm (0.128")
-1.6 mm (-0.064")
Length Fit
10
10
Toe Clearance Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Rocker Geometry
8.4
8.8
Heel Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Spring
31 mm (1.2")
39 mm (1.5")
Heel Apex Position
21.6%
25.3%
Heel Rocker Angle
26.6°
27.5°
Forefoot Rocker Geometry
7.8
7.2
Forefoot Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe Spring
55 mm (2.2")
50 mm (2.0")
Toe Apex Position
58.2%
62.8%
Forefoot Rocker Angle
24.6°
24.4°
Foam
Primary Foam Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Secondary Foam Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Primary Foam Name
Not Advertised
PWRRUN
Primary Foam Type
EVA
EVA
Secondary Foam Name
No Secondary Foam
No Secondary Foam
Secondary Foam Type
No Secondary Foam
No Secondary Foam
Laces
Laces Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Lace Type
Flat
Flat
Width
6.0 mm (0.2")
6.0 mm (0.2")
Thickness
1.4 mm (0.1")
1.5 mm (0.1")
Stretch
8.5%
6.5%
Other Features
Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Tongue Gusset Type
Non-gusseted
Non-gusseted
Plate
None
None
Performance
Heel Compression Energy Return
1.0
3.9
Heel Compression Video
Heel Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Heel Energy Return
64.4%
70.5%
Forefoot Compression Energy Return
1.3
6.7
Forefoot Compression Video
Forefoot Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Energy Return
65.9%
75.2%
Heel Cushioning
7.7
6.3
Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 550N
3.46 J
2.64 J
Energy Absorbed At 1100N
9.54 J
7.96 J
Energy Absorbed At 1900N
16.15 J
14.40 J
Forefoot Cushioning
6.9
6.6
Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 800N
4.27 J
3.99 J
Energy Absorbed At 1300N
7.38 J
7.05 J
Energy Absorbed At 2050N
10.82 J
10.49 J
Heel Firmness
8.2
9.1
Heel Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 550N
45.8 N/mm
58.3 N/mm
Firmness At 1100N
55.8 N/mm
68.2 N/mm
Firmness At 1900N
78.2 N/mm
92.3 N/mm
Forefoot Firmness
9.0
9.1
Forefoot Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 800N
66.9 N/mm
69.5 N/mm
Firmness At 1300N
86.7 N/mm
89.7 N/mm
Firmness At 2050N
120 N/mm
123 N/mm
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
6.2
5.8
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 10km
6.73 J
6.49 J
Energy Absorbed At 20km
6.58 J
6.23 J
Energy Absorbed At 30km
6.49 J
6.05 J
Energy Absorbed At 40km
6.44 J
5.92 J
Rocker Stiffness
5.4
6.8
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Video
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Force To Flatten The Rocker
49 N
80 N
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
2.4
4.1
Forefoot Bending Video
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
47.9%
53.8%
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
4.2
5.9
Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Bending Resistance
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
-0.5 N/mm
4.0 N/mm
Forefoot Bending Force
322 N
353 N
Heel Compression Depth
5.8
4.6
Heel Compression Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Heel Compression At 550N
12.0 mm
9.4 mm
Heel Compression At 1100N
19.7 mm
16.1 mm
Heel Compression At 1900N
24.3 mm
20.6 mm
Forefoot Compression Depth
5.2
5.0
Forefoot Compression Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Compression At 800N
12.0 mm
11.5 mm
Forefoot Compression At 1300N
15.0 mm
14.5 mm
Forefoot Compression At 2050N
17.1 mm
16.6 mm
HOKA Rincon 5
Saucony Procyon Max
Comments
HOKA Rincon 5 vs Saucony Procyon Max: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.