HOKA Skyward X vs Mizuno Neo Vista 2

Which Running Shoe Is Better?

Products

HOKA Skyward X
Mizuno Neo Vista 2

Tested using Methodology v0.9

Updated Oct 29, 2025 06:55 PM

SEE PRICE
Hoka.com

Tested using Methodology v0.9

Updated Oct 28, 2025 05:24 PM

SEE PRICE
Mizuno
  1. Recommended in 3 articles:
  2. Running Shoes
  3. For Women
  4. For Men

Our Verdict

HOKA Skyward X

Mizuno Neo Vista 2

The Mizuno Neo Vista 2 and HOKA Skyward X both occupy the niche of ultra-cushioned, plated trainers designed for long miles and recovery runs, but they take very different approaches. The Mizuno uses a towering stack of foam paired with a plastic plate, delivering a deeply cushioned experience (especially in the heel) that's almost as plush as the HOKA. Despite all that foam, it still comes in lighter, making it easier to turn over during long efforts. The HOKA, on the other hand, leans on a more structured, H-shaped carbon plate embedded in the soft and responsive midsole. It delivers a slightly softer feel overall, and its upper is more traditional, offering a more standard fit compared to the Mizuno shoe's high-volume, roomy construction.

0 

Variants

  • Skyward X (Black/Electric Aqua - (Men - US 9))
  • Skyward X (Blanc De Blanc/Swim Day - (Women - US 7))
  • Skyward X (Blanc De Blanc/Virtual Blue - (Men - US 9))
  • Skyward X (Cosmic Grey/Rose Gold - (Women - US 7))
  • Skyward X (Cosmic Grey/Silver - (Men - US 9))
  • Skyward X (Frost/Lupine - (Men - US 9))
  • Skyward X (Frost/Lupine - (Women - US 7))
  • Skyward X (Lettuce/Cloudless - (Men - US 9))
  • Skyward X (Lettuce/Cloudless - (Women - US 7))
  • Skyward X (Luna Moth/Black - (Men - US 9))
  • Skyward X (Mint Fluorite /Blue Spark - (Women - US 7))
  • Neo Vista 2 (Baritone Blue/Frozen Emerald - (Men - US 9))
  • Neo Vista 2 (Baritone Blue/Striking Coral - (Women - US 7))
  • Neo Vista 2 (White - (Men - US 9))
  • Neo Vista 2 (White/Striking Coral - (Women - US 7))

Main Differences for
Marathon Racing

Threshold 

0.10

Marathon Racing 

7.3
7.2

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

7.7
5.5

Weight  

4.1
5.9

Heel Energy Return 
 

7.5
6.0

Plate 
 

Carbon Fiber
Plastic

Full Comparison

Design

Weight  

4.1
5.9

Right Shoe Weight Photo  

Left Shoe Weight Photo  

Weight 
 

306.9 g (10.82 oz)
263.4 g (9.29 oz)
Show Text 

Stack Heights 
 

Stack Height Photo  

Heel Stack Height 
 

50.4 mm
50.1 mm

Forefoot Stack Height 
 

43.6 mm
40.3 mm

Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

6.8 mm
9.8 mm

Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

5.0 mm
8.0 mm
Show Text 

External Shape 
 

3D Model Full Shoe  

Outsole Heel Width 
 

95 mm (3.7")
95 mm (3.8")

Outsole Arch Width 
 

82 mm (3.2")
88 mm (3.5")

Outsole Forefoot Width 
 

119 mm (4.7")
117 mm (4.6")

Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

1.88
1.89

Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

2.73
2.90
Show Text 

Internal Shape 
 

3D Model Internal  

Internal Length 
 

274 mm (10.8")
281 mm (11.1")

Internal Heel Width 
 

60 mm (2.4")
62 mm (2.4")

Internal Forefoot Width 
 

91 mm (3.6")
95 mm (3.7")

Wide Sizing Available 
 

No
No

Other Features  

Other Features Photo  

Tongue Gusset Type 
 

Semi-gusseted
Non-gusseted

Plate 
 

Carbon Fiber
Plastic
Performance

Heel Energy Return 
 

7.5
6.0

Heel Compression Video  

Heel Energy Return  

See details
See details

Heel Energy Return 
 

78.1%
73.4%
Show Text 

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

7.7
5.5

Forefoot Compression Video  

Forefoot Energy Return  

See details
See details

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

79.2%
72.6%
Show Text 

Heel Cushioning 
 

8.8
9.2

Heel Cushioning Picture  

Heel Cushioning  

See details
See details

Energy Absorbed At 550N 
 

3.56 J
4.55 J

Energy Absorbed At 1100N 
 

11.41 J
11.67 J

Energy Absorbed At 1900N 
 

21.08 J
19.26 J
Show Text 

Forefoot Cushioning 
 

9.6
9.0

Forefoot Cushioning Picture  

Forefoot Cushioning  

See details
See details

Energy Absorbed At 800N 
 

6.19 J
5.90 J

Energy Absorbed At 1300N 
 

11.79 J
10.15 J

Energy Absorbed At 2050N 
 

18.34 J
14.54 J
Show Text 

Heel Firmness 
 

3.7
4.3

Heel Firmness  

See details
See details

Firmness At 550N 
 

42.8 N/mm
39.7 N/mm

Firmness At 1100N 
 

79.0 N/mm
98.3 N/mm

Firmness At 1900N 
 

169.4 N/mm
220.9 N/mm
Show Text 

Forefoot Firmness 
 

5.3
7.3

Forefoot Firmness  

See details
See details

Firmness At 800N 
 

66.2 N/mm
80.8 N/mm

Firmness At 1300N 
 

128.1 N/mm
184.6 N/mm

Firmness At 2050N 
 

250.9 N/mm
386.2 N/mm
Show Text 

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning 
 

9.0
7.8

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning  

See details
See details

Energy Absorbed At 10km 
 

10.59 J
8.45 J

Energy Absorbed At 20km 
 

10.34 J
8.32 J

Energy Absorbed At 30km 
 

10.19 J
8.26 J

Energy Absorbed At 40km 
 

10.08 J
8.21 J

HOKA Skyward X

Mizuno Neo Vista 2

Comments

  1. Comparison

HOKA Skyward X vs Mizuno Neo Vista 2: Main Discussion

What do you think of these products? Let us know below.


Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Insiders have direct access to buying advice on our insider forum.

PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
No comments yet, refresh to see new ones