Products
Tested using Methodology v0.13
Updated Sep 29, 2026 08:27 PM
SEE PRICE
Mount to Coast
Tested using Methodology v0.16
Updated Sep 29, 2026 08:20 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Heel Stack Height
41.8 mm
Weight
268.2 g (9.46 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
7.9 mm
Plate
None
Heel Stack Height
42.0 mm
Weight
241.7 g (8.53 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
8.2 mm
Plate
None
Our Verdict
Mount to Coast C1
Speedland RX:PNW
The Mount to Coast C1 is a better long-distance shoe than the Speedland RX:PNW if stability and value are your priorities. Both are deeply cushioned road shoes built for high mileage, but the Mount to Coast is much more trustworthy while providing better protection over longer distances. The Speedland is lighter and gives you a bit more rebound, but for most runners, it's not worth the extra money.
Variants
- C1 (Pulse - (Men - US 9))
- C1 (Ultraviolet - (Women - US 7))
- RX:PNW (Blue - (Men - US 9))
- RX:PNW (Blue - (Women - US 7))
Main Differences for
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Threshold
Half/Full Marathon Racing
7.5
7.6
Weight
5.7
6.7
Full Comparison
Design
Weight
5.7
6.7
Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Weight
268.2 g (9.46 oz)
241.7 g (8.53 oz)
Stack Heights
Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Stack Height
41.8 mm
42.0 mm
Forefoot Stack Height
33.9 mm
33.8 mm
Heel-To-Toe Drop
7.9 mm
8.2 mm
Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
6.0 mm
7.0 mm
External Shape
3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Outsole Heel Width
96 mm (3.8")
96 mm (3.8")
Outsole Arch Width
82 mm (3.2")
75 mm (3.0")
Outsole Forefoot Width
121 mm (4.8")
113 mm (4.4")
Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
2.30
2.29
Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
3.56
3.34
Internal Shape
3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Internal Length
281 mm (11.1")
284 mm (11.2")
Internal Heel Width
70 mm (2.8")
70 mm (2.8")
Internal Forefoot Width
98 mm (3.9")
100 mm (3.9")
Wide Sizing Available
No
No
Forefoot Fit: Width
9.0
6.8
Forefoot Width Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation
4.4 mm (0.171")
9.2 mm (0.361")
Toe TTS Deviation
-0.3 mm (-0.012")
5.9 mm (0.230")
Forefoot Fit: Height
8.0
5.5
Forefoot Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe TTS Deviation
-2.4 mm (-0.096")
-5.3 mm (-0.209")
Arch Fit: Width
9.9
9.7
Arch Fit Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Arch Width TTS Deviation
1.8 mm (0.070")
-0.9 mm (-0.036")
Length Fit
10
10
Toe Clearance Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Rocker Geometry
8.4
7.2
Heel Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Spring
30 mm (1.2")
20 mm (0.8")
Heel Apex Position
19.0%
20.7%
Heel Rocker Angle
28.2°
18.4°
Forefoot Rocker Geometry
7.2
5.5
Forefoot Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe Spring
49 mm (1.9")
29 mm (1.1")
Toe Apex Position
62.7%
62.1%
Forefoot Rocker Angle
24.0°
28.6°
Foam
Primary Foam Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Secondary Foam Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Primary Foam Name
Circlecell
RX UNCOMPRESSED SCF
Primary Foam Type
TPEE
TPU
Secondary Foam Name
No Secondary Foam
RX UNCOMPRESSED SCF
Secondary Foam Type
No Secondary Foam
OBC + EVA
Laces
Laces Picture
Lace Type
Round
Width
1.0 mm (0.0")
Thickness
1.0 mm (0.0")
Stretch
0.0%
Breathability
7.5
Breathability Video
Upper Breathability
Upper Microscope Photo
Time-To-Dry
8.4
Time-To-Dry Timelapse
Time-To-Dry Graph
Preview Graph
Time To 30% Dry
4.9 hrs
Time To 70% Dry
13.8 hrs
Time To Dry
21.8 hrs
Water Absorption
9.2
Dry Weight Photo
Wet Weight Photo
Water Absorbed
29.7%
Other Features
Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Tongue Gusset Type
Semi-gusseted
Non-gusseted
Plate
None
None
Performance
Heel Compression Energy Return
6.6
6.4
Heel Compression Video
Heel Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Heel Energy Return
74.7%
74.4%
Forefoot Compression Energy Return
7.2
8.0
Forefoot Compression Video
Forefoot Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Energy Return
76.7%
81.0%
Heel Cushioning
8.0
8.5
Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 550N
3.27 J
4.23 J
Energy Absorbed At 1100N
9.82 J
10.32 J
Energy Absorbed At 1900N
17.91 J
16.95 J
Forefoot Cushioning
8.8
8.7
Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 800N
5.27 J
5.68 J
Energy Absorbed At 1300N
9.70 J
9.61 J
Energy Absorbed At 2050N
15.05 J
13.96 J
Heel Firmness
8.3
5.7
Heel Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 550N
49.7 N/mm
33.3 N/mm
Firmness At 1100N
57.0 N/mm
45.3 N/mm
Firmness At 1900N
76.3 N/mm
65.8 N/mm
Forefoot Firmness
7.3
5.4
Forefoot Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 800N
56.1 N/mm
46.7 N/mm
Firmness At 1300N
69.9 N/mm
61.9 N/mm
Firmness At 2050N
94 N/mm
87 N/mm
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
8.3
8.3
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 10km
9.21 J
9.17 J
Energy Absorbed At 20km
9.07 J
9.03 J
Energy Absorbed At 30km
8.99 J
8.94 J
Energy Absorbed At 40km
8.94 J
8.87 J
Rocker Stiffness
7.8
6.2
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Video
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Force To Flatten The Rocker
111 N
66 N
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
7.2
7.3
Forefoot Bending Video
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
65.9%
66.4%
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
7.0
7.0
Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Bending Resistance
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
10.7 N/mm
15.9 N/mm
Forefoot Bending Force
286 N
236 N
Heel Compression Depth
7.3
Heel Compression Graph
Preview Graph
Heel Compression At 550N
16.5 mm
Heel Compression At 1100N
24.3 mm
Heel Compression At 1900N
28.9 mm
Forefoot Compression Depth
7.2
Forefoot Compression Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Compression At 800N
17.1 mm
Forefoot Compression At 1300N
21.0 mm
Forefoot Compression At 2050N
23.7 mm
To access
Become a member
unlimited full product reviews,
product prices, and
other exclusive site features
Mount to Coast C1
Speedland RX:PNW
Comments
Mount to Coast C1 vs Speedland RX:PNW: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.