Nike Alphafly 3 vs Zoom Fly 6

Which Running Shoe Is Better?

Products

Nike Alphafly 3
Nike Zoom Fly 6

Tested using Methodology v0.11

Updated Apr 10, 2026 07:58 PM

SEE PRICE
Nike.com

Tested using Methodology v0.10

Updated Feb 26, 2026 08:30 PM

SEE PRICE
DicksSportingGoods.com
Nike Alphafly 3 Picture

Track

Nike Zoom Fly 6 Picture

Track

  1. Recommended in 1 article:
  2. Nike

Our Verdict

Nike Alphafly 3

Nike Zoom Fly 6

The Nike Zoom Fly 6 and the Nike Alphafly 3 share visual similarities and core components, but they serve very different purposes. The Alphafly 3 is Nike's flagship marathon racer, built for maximum efficiency and propulsion with Zoom Air pods, a full ZoomX midsole, and a lighter overall weight. It’s designed to feel explosive and energetic at race pace, offering a uniquely spring-loaded forefoot that shines in long-distance racing. In contrast, the Zoom Fly 6 is a more accessible, training-focused take on that formula, featuring only a thin top layer of ZoomX over a firmer SR-02 carrier foam, resulting in a more muted and less responsive ride. It's also noticeably heavier and better suited for steady long runs or marathon-pace workouts. While the Alphafly 3 feels refined and race-ready, the Zoom Fly 6 is more durable and a safer introduction to plated shoes, especially for runners not yet ready to jump into a super shoe racer. That said, the gap in performance is significant—if you're chasing personal bests on race day, the Alphafly 3 is in a different class altogether.

0 

Variants

  • Alphafly 3 (Black/Olive Aura/Metallic Silver - (Men - US 9))
  • Alphafly 3 (Bright Crimson/Lime Blast/Mint Foam/Cave Purple - (Men - US 9))
  • Zoom Fly 6 (Black/Light Smoke Grey/White - (Men - US 9))
  • Zoom Fly 6 (Bright Crimson/Lime Blast/Mint Foam/Cave Purple - (Women - US 7))
Read more

Main Differences for
Marathon Racing

Threshold 

0.10

Marathon Racing 
 

8.5
7.7

Weight  

8.1
6.5

Heel Compression Energy Return 
 

8.2
5.6

Forefoot Compression Energy Return 
 

8.2
7.5

Full Comparison

Design

Weight  

8.1
6.5

Right Shoe Weight Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Nike Alphafly 3 Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Nike Zoom Fly 6 Right Shoe Weight Photo

Left Shoe Weight Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Nike Alphafly 3 Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Nike Zoom Fly 6 Left Shoe Weight Photo

Weight 
 

200.7 g (7.08 oz)
247.1 g (8.71 oz)

Stack Heights 
 

Stack Height Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Nike Alphafly 3 Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Nike Zoom Fly 6 Stack Height Photo

Heel Stack Height 
 

39.8 mm
42.5 mm

Forefoot Stack Height 
 

33.4 mm
32.8 mm

Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

6.4 mm
9.7 mm

Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

8.0 mm
8.0 mm

External Shape 
 

3D Model Full Shoe  

Preview 3D
Nike Alphafly 3 3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
Nike Zoom Fly 6 3D Model Full Shoe

Outsole Heel Width 
 

91 mm (3.6")
84 mm (3.3")

Outsole Arch Width 
 

68 mm (2.7")
69 mm (2.7")

Outsole Forefoot Width 
 

116 mm (4.6")
112 mm (4.4")

Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

2.29
1.98

Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

3.47
3.41

Internal Shape 
 

3D Model Internal  

Preview 3D
Nike Alphafly 3 3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
Nike Zoom Fly 6 3D Model Internal

Internal Length 
 

273 mm (10.7")
275 mm (10.8")

Internal Heel Width 
 

59 mm (2.3")
61 mm (2.4")

Internal Forefoot Width 
 

90 mm (3.5")
87 mm (3.4")

Wide Sizing Available 
 

No
No

Forefoot Fit: Width 
 

9.4
9.0

Forefoot Width Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Nike Alphafly 3 Forefoot Width Photo
Compare High-Res
Nike Zoom Fly 6 Forefoot Width Photo

Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation 
 

-0.8 mm (-0.032")
-2.7 mm (-0.105")

Toe TTS Deviation 
 

-2.2 mm (-0.087")
1.5 mm (0.059")

Forefoot Fit: Height 
 

9.7
7.8

Forefoot Height Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Nike Alphafly 3 Forefoot Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Nike Zoom Fly 6 Forefoot Height Photo

Toe TTS Deviation 
 

-0.8 mm (-0.030")
-2.7 mm (-0.104")

Arch Fit: Width 
 

6.2
5.5

Arch Fit Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Nike Alphafly 3 Arch Fit Photo
Compare High-Res
Nike Zoom Fly 6 Arch Fit Photo

Arch Width TTS Deviation 
 

-5.6 mm (-0.219")
-6.4 mm (-0.250")

Length Fit 
 

10
10

Toe Clearance Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Nike Alphafly 3 Toe Clearance Photo
Compare High-Res
Nike Zoom Fly 6 Toe Clearance Photo

Heel Rocker Geometry 
 

6.6

Heel Rocker Photo  

Nike Alphafly 3 Heel Rocker Photo

Heel Spring 
 

16 mm (0.6")

Heel Apex Position 
 

15.3%

Heel Rocker Angle 
 

21.3°

Forefoot Rocker Geometry 
 

6.7

Forefoot Rocker Photo  

Nike Alphafly 3 Forefoot Rocker Photo

Toe Spring 
 

45 mm (1.8")

Toe Apex Position 
 

66.4%

Forefoot Rocker Angle 
 

26.6°

Other Features  

Other Features Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
Nike Alphafly 3 Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
Nike Zoom Fly 6 Other Features Photo

Tongue Gusset Type 
 

Non-gusseted
Fully-gusseted

Plate 
 

Carbon Fiber
Carbon Fiber
Performance

Heel Compression Energy Return 
 

8.2
5.6

Heel Compression Video  

Heel Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
Nike Alphafly 3 Heel Energy Return
 Preview Graph
Nike Zoom Fly 6 Heel Energy Return

Heel Energy Return 
 

82.0%
72.8%

Forefoot Compression Energy Return 
 

8.2
7.5

Forefoot Compression Video  

Forefoot Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
Nike Alphafly 3 Forefoot Energy Return
 Preview Graph
Nike Zoom Fly 6 Forefoot Energy Return

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

82.2%
78.2%

Heel Cushioning 
 

7.6
7.3

Heel Cushioning Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Nike Alphafly 3 Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Nike Zoom Fly 6 Heel Cushioning Picture

Heel Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
Nike Alphafly 3 Heel Cushioning
 Preview Graph
Nike Zoom Fly 6 Heel Cushioning

Energy Absorbed At 550N 
 

3.82 J
3.50 J

Energy Absorbed At 1100N 
 

9.18 J
8.99 J

Energy Absorbed At 1900N 
 

14.96 J
14.93 J

Forefoot Cushioning 
 

8.0
7.2

Forefoot Cushioning Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
Nike Alphafly 3 Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Nike Zoom Fly 6 Forefoot Cushioning Picture

Forefoot Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
Nike Alphafly 3 Forefoot Cushioning
 Preview Graph
Nike Zoom Fly 6 Forefoot Cushioning

Energy Absorbed At 800N 
 

4.68 J
4.41 J

Energy Absorbed At 1300N 
 

8.55 J
7.70 J

Energy Absorbed At 2050N 
 

13.10 J
11.45 J

Heel Firmness 
 

5.9
5.9

Heel Firmness  

 Preview Graph
Nike Alphafly 3 Heel Firmness
 Preview Graph
Nike Zoom Fly 6 Heel Firmness

Firmness At 550N 
 

49.4 N/mm
51.7 N/mm

Firmness At 1100N 
 

129.6 N/mm
125.1 N/mm

Firmness At 1900N 
 

277.3 N/mm
266.8 N/mm

Forefoot Firmness 
 

7.4
8.2

Forefoot Firmness  

 Preview Graph
Nike Alphafly 3 Forefoot Firmness
 Preview Graph
Nike Zoom Fly 6 Forefoot Firmness

Firmness At 800N 
 

103.1 N/mm
110.8 N/mm

Firmness At 1300N 
 

170.1 N/mm
221.1 N/mm

Firmness At 2050N 
 

370.8 N/mm
432.4 N/mm

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning 
 

7.8
6.6

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
Nike Alphafly 3 Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
 Preview Graph
Nike Zoom Fly 6 Forefoot Long Run Cushioning

Energy Absorbed At 10km 
 

8.41 J
7.10 J

Energy Absorbed At 20km 
 

8.33 J
7.03 J

Energy Absorbed At 30km 
 

8.27 J
6.99 J

Energy Absorbed At 40km 
 

8.24 J
6.95 J

Rocker Stiffness 
 

7.9

Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Video  

Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph  

 Preview Graph
Nike Alphafly 3 Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph

Force To Flatten The Rocker 
 

117 N

Forefoot Bending Energy Return 
 

8.0

Forefoot Bending Video  

Forefoot Bending Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
Nike Alphafly 3 Forefoot Bending Energy Return

Forefoot Bending Energy Return 
 

71.3%

Forefoot Bending Stiffness 
 

9.5

Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture  

Nike Alphafly 3 Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture

Forefoot Bending Resistance  

 Preview Graph
Nike Alphafly 3 Forefoot Bending Resistance

Forefoot Bending Stiffness 
 

41.6 N/mm

Forefoot Bending Force 
 

484 N

Nike Alphafly 3

Nike Zoom Fly 6

Comments

  1. Comparison

Nike Alphafly 3 vs Nike Zoom Fly 6: Main Discussion

What do you think of these products? Let us know below.


Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.

PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
No comments yet, refresh to see new ones