Products
Tested using Methodology v0.12
Updated Jun 16, 2026 05:47 PM
SEE PRICE
Nike.com
Tested using Methodology v0.13
Updated Sep 02, 2026 07:50 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Heel Stack Height
38.2 mm
Weight
287.3 g (10.13 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
8.4 mm
Plate
None
Heel Stack Height
42.7 mm
Weight
297.5 g (10.49 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
10.3 mm
Plate
None
Our Verdict
Nike Invincible 3
Nike Vomero 18
The Nike Invincible 3 and Nike Vomero 18 suit different types of easy running. The Invincible 3 offers considerably more bounce, making relaxed mileage more lively, while the Vomero 18 provides better stability with more consistent protection over longer efforts. Get the Invincible 3 if you want an energetic, easy-day shoe; get the Vomero 18 if you prioritize stability or longer-run protection.
Variants
- Invincible 3 (Electric Pack/Olympic Safari - (Men - US 9))
- Invincible 3 (Jade Ice/White-Clear Jade - (Women - US 7))
- Vomero 18 (Black/Summit White/Coconut Milk - (Men - US 9))
- Vomero 18 (Black/Summit White/Coconut Milk - (Women - US 7))
Main Differences for
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Threshold
Half/Full Marathon Racing
6.6
6.5
Forefoot Compression Energy Return
8.0
5.0
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
5.5
7.0
Weight
4.9
4.5
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
7.1
5.9
Full Comparison
Design
Weight
4.9
4.5
Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Weight
287.3 g (10.13 oz)
297.5 g (10.49 oz)
Stack Heights
Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Stack Height
38.2 mm
42.7 mm
Forefoot Stack Height
29.8 mm
32.4 mm
Heel-To-Toe Drop
8.4 mm
10.3 mm
Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
9.0 mm
10.0 mm
External Shape
3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Outsole Heel Width
99 mm (3.9")
96 mm (3.8")
Outsole Arch Width
72 mm (2.8")
72 mm (2.8")
Outsole Forefoot Width
118 mm (4.6")
116 mm (4.6")
Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
2.59
2.25
Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
3.96
3.58
Internal Shape
3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Internal Length
272 mm (10.7")
278 mm (10.9")
Internal Heel Width
63 mm (2.5")
64 mm (2.5")
Internal Forefoot Width
93 mm (3.7")
91 mm (3.6")
Wide Sizing Available
Yes
Yes
Forefoot Fit: Width
9.1
9.2
Forefoot Width Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation
3.9 mm (0.154")
0.8 mm (0.031")
Toe TTS Deviation
1.9 mm (0.073")
-3.2 mm (-0.124")
Forefoot Fit: Height
6.0
7.7
Forefoot Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe TTS Deviation
-4.8 mm (-0.188")
-2.7 mm (-0.108")
Arch Fit: Width
9.5
8.2
Arch Fit Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Arch Width TTS Deviation
-1.2 mm (-0.045")
-3.1 mm (-0.121")
Length Fit
10
10
Toe Clearance Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Rocker Geometry
7.2
8.3
Heel Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Spring
21 mm (0.8")
31 mm (1.2")
Heel Apex Position
22.0%
26.8%
Heel Rocker Angle
17.9°
21.2°
Forefoot Rocker Geometry
5.8
6.6
Forefoot Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe Spring
40 mm (1.6")
45 mm (1.8")
Toe Apex Position
59.5%
59.7%
Forefoot Rocker Angle
18.4°
20.6°
Foam
Primary Foam Picture
Secondary Foam Picture
Primary Foam Name
ZoomX
Primary Foam Type
PEBA
Secondary Foam Name
ReactX
Secondary Foam Type
TPEE
Other Features
Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Tongue Gusset Type
Non-gusseted
Fully-gusseted
Plate
None
None
Performance
Heel Compression Energy Return
8.1
3.6
Heel Compression Video
Heel Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Heel Energy Return
81.2%
70.1%
Forefoot Compression Energy Return
8.0
5.0
Forefoot Compression Video
Forefoot Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Energy Return
80.8%
71.9%
Heel Cushioning
6.7
7.8
Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 550N
2.92 J
3.38 J
Energy Absorbed At 1100N
8.31 J
9.50 J
Energy Absorbed At 1900N
14.67 J
17.15 J
Forefoot Cushioning
5.9
7.5
Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 800N
3.83 J
4.43 J
Energy Absorbed At 1300N
6.31 J
7.97 J
Energy Absorbed At 2050N
9.05 J
11.95 J
Heel Firmness
8.7
8.0
Heel Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 550N
50.2 N/mm
45.3 N/mm
Firmness At 1100N
62.0 N/mm
55.2 N/mm
Firmness At 1900N
85.8 N/mm
75.5 N/mm
Forefoot Firmness
9.2
8.9
Forefoot Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 800N
67.1 N/mm
65.8 N/mm
Firmness At 1300N
90.6 N/mm
83.3 N/mm
Firmness At 2050N
128 N/mm
114 N/mm
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
5.5
7.0
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 10km
6.01 J
7.58 J
Energy Absorbed At 20km
5.93 J
7.40 J
Energy Absorbed At 30km
5.89 J
7.31 J
Energy Absorbed At 40km
5.85 J
7.25 J
Rocker Stiffness
4.2
4.3
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Video
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Force To Flatten The Rocker
33 N
34 N
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
7.1
5.9
Forefoot Bending Video
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
65.5%
59.9%
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
7.0
7.4
Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Bending Resistance
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
11.9 N/mm
13.3 N/mm
Forefoot Bending Force
270 N
294 N
To access
Become a member
unlimited full product reviews,
product prices, and
other exclusive site features
Nike Invincible 3
Nike Vomero 18
Comments
Nike Invincible 3 vs Nike Vomero 18: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.