Products
Tested using Methodology v0.12
Updated Sep 15, 2026 06:17 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Tested using Methodology v0.14
Updated Sep 17, 2026 05:20 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Heel Stack Height
37.9 mm
Weight
293.9 g (10.37 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
8.5 mm
Plate
None
Heel Stack Height
40.7 mm
Weight
292.9 g (10.33 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
4.4 mm
Plate
None
Our Verdict
Nike Structure 26
Saucony Hurricane 25
The Saucony Hurricane 25 is a better shoe than the Nike Structure 26 for most runners. It's far more cushioned and bouncier, making it the pick for runners who want support that still feels soft and comfortable on longer runs. The Structure 26 is firmer and more stable, so it's the better choice for runners who need strong support and prefer a traditional, closer-to-the-ground feel. It runs short, so consider going up a half size.
Variants
- Structure 26 (Black/Cool Grey/Metallic Silver/White - (Men - US 9))
- Structure 26 (Black/Iron Grey/Black - (Men - US 9))
- Hurricane 25 (Arctic/White - (Men - US 9))
- Hurricane 25 (Black/Black/Black - (Women - US 7))
Main Differences for
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Threshold
Half/Full Marathon Racing
5.9
7.2
Forefoot Compression Energy Return
3.5
8.0
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
4.8
8.1
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
6.2
7.8
Rocker Stiffness
4.1
7.4
Forefoot Stack Height
29.4 mm
36.2 mm
Full Comparison
Design
Weight
4.6
4.7
Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Weight
293.9 g (10.37 oz)
292.9 g (10.33 oz)
Stack Heights
Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Stack Height
37.9 mm
40.7 mm
Forefoot Stack Height
29.4 mm
36.2 mm
Heel-To-Toe Drop
8.5 mm
4.4 mm
Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
10.0 mm
6.0 mm
External Shape
3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Outsole Heel Width
93 mm (3.7")
101 mm (4.0")
Outsole Arch Width
81 mm (3.2")
79 mm (3.1")
Outsole Forefoot Width
114 mm (4.5")
124 mm (4.9")
Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
2.46
2.49
Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
3.88
3.43
Internal Shape
3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Internal Length
277 mm (10.9")
280 mm (11.0")
Internal Heel Width
66 mm (2.6")
66 mm (2.6")
Internal Forefoot Width
92 mm (3.6")
91 mm (3.6")
Wide Sizing Available
Yes
Yes
Forefoot Fit: Width
9.3
9.8
Forefoot Width Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation
-1.3 mm (-0.050")
1.7 mm (0.065")
Toe TTS Deviation
-2.3 mm (-0.092")
-0.3 mm (-0.013")
Forefoot Fit: Height
6.1
7.3
Forefoot Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe TTS Deviation
-4.7 mm (-0.183")
-3.3 mm (-0.128")
Arch Fit: Width
7.9
10
Arch Fit Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Arch Width TTS Deviation
-3.4 mm (-0.134")
-0.3 mm (-0.011")
Length Fit
5.0
10
Toe Clearance Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Rocker Geometry
6.9
7.6
Heel Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Spring
18 mm (0.7")
23 mm (0.9")
Heel Apex Position
15.2%
21.7%
Heel Rocker Angle
21.8°
19.5°
Forefoot Rocker Geometry
4.6
6.8
Forefoot Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe Spring
34 mm (1.3")
47 mm (1.9")
Toe Apex Position
67.7%
66.7%
Forefoot Rocker Angle
19.5°
25.2°
Foam
Primary Foam Picture
Secondary Foam Picture
Primary Foam Name
PWRRUN PB
Primary Foam Type
PEBA
Secondary Foam Name
PWRRUN
Secondary Foam Type
EVA
Laces
Laces Picture
Lace Type
Round
Width
5.0 mm (0.2")
Thickness
3.3 mm (0.1")
Stretch
14.5%
Other Features
Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Tongue Gusset Type
Semi-gusseted
Fully-gusseted
Plate
None
None
Performance
Heel Compression Energy Return
2.9
7.0
Heel Compression Video
Heel Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Heel Energy Return
69.3%
76.3%
Forefoot Compression Energy Return
3.5
8.0
Forefoot Compression Video
Forefoot Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Energy Return
70.1%
80.7%
Heel Cushioning
6.9
8.0
Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 550N
2.89 J
3.50 J
Energy Absorbed At 1100N
8.48 J
9.69 J
Energy Absorbed At 1900N
15.38 J
17.42 J
Forefoot Cushioning
5.5
8.9
Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 800N
3.33 J
5.71 J
Energy Absorbed At 1300N
5.78 J
10.02 J
Energy Absorbed At 2050N
8.98 J
14.70 J
Heel Firmness
8.7
7.4
Heel Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 550N
51.2 N/mm
41.4 N/mm
Firmness At 1100N
61.9 N/mm
52.2 N/mm
Firmness At 1900N
84.3 N/mm
71.9 N/mm
Forefoot Firmness
9.7
5.4
Forefoot Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 800N
83.7 N/mm
47.7 N/mm
Firmness At 1300N
108.8 N/mm
61.9 N/mm
Firmness At 2050N
147 N/mm
86 N/mm
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
4.8
8.1
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 10km
5.35 J
9.14 J
Energy Absorbed At 20km
5.21 J
8.81 J
Energy Absorbed At 30km
5.12 J
8.57 J
Energy Absorbed At 40km
5.07 J
8.41 J
Rocker Stiffness
4.1
7.4
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Video
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Force To Flatten The Rocker
31 N
95 N
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
6.2
7.8
Forefoot Bending Video
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
61.2%
70.1%
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
7.3
7.3
Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Bending Resistance
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
13.1 N/mm
15.4 N/mm
Forefoot Bending Force
289 N
256 N
Nike Structure 26
Saucony Hurricane 25
Comments
Nike Structure 26 vs Saucony Hurricane 25: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.