Products
Tested using Methodology v0.15
Updated Oct 09, 2026 03:48 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Tested using Methodology v0.12
Updated Oct 30, 2026 06:23 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Heel Stack Height
40.7 mm
Weight
292.9 g (10.33 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
4.4 mm
Plate
None
Heel Stack Height
35.3 mm
Weight
297.9 g (10.51 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
5.5 mm
Plate
None
Our Verdict
Saucony Hurricane 25
On Cloudrunner 3
The Saucony Hurricane 25 is a better shoe than the On Cloudrunner 3. It's much more cushioned and far bouncier, making it the pick for runners who want a comfortable support shoe for everything from easy miles to long runs, and it's cheaper. The Cloudrunner 3 is a bit more stable and sits closer to the ground, so it's the better choice for runners who want a firm, planted feel, but it can feel harsh on longer runs.
Variants
- Hurricane 25 (Arctic/White - (Men - US 9))
- Hurricane 25 (Black/Black/Black - (Women - US 7))
- Cloudrunner 3 (Black/Black - (US - Women 7))
- Cloudrunner 3 (Black/Ivory - (US - Men 9))
Main Differences for
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Threshold
Half/Full Marathon Racing
7.2
5.4
Forefoot Compression Energy Return
8.0
1.4
Heel Stack Height
40.7 mm
35.3 mm
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
8.1
5.2
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
7.8
4.2
Heel Compression Energy Return
7.0
0.8
Full Comparison
Design
Weight
4.7
4.5
Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Weight
292.9 g (10.33 oz)
297.9 g (10.51 oz)
Stack Heights
Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Stack Height
40.7 mm
35.3 mm
Forefoot Stack Height
36.2 mm
29.8 mm
Heel-To-Toe Drop
4.4 mm
5.5 mm
Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
6.0 mm
10.0 mm
External Shape
3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Outsole Heel Width
101 mm (4.0")
95 mm (3.7")
Outsole Arch Width
79 mm (3.1")
76 mm (3.0")
Outsole Forefoot Width
124 mm (4.9")
116 mm (4.6")
Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
2.49
2.69
Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
3.43
3.89
Internal Shape
3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Internal Length
280 mm (11.0")
276 mm (10.9")
Internal Heel Width
66 mm (2.6")
66 mm (2.6")
Internal Forefoot Width
91 mm (3.6")
90 mm (3.5")
Wide Sizing Available
Yes
Yes
Forefoot Fit: Width
9.8
9.6
Forefoot Width Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation
1.7 mm (0.065")
2.4 mm (0.094")
Toe TTS Deviation
-0.3 mm (-0.013")
2.2 mm (0.085")
Forefoot Fit: Height
7.3
9.9
Forefoot Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe TTS Deviation
-3.3 mm (-0.128")
-0.4 mm (-0.017")
Arch Fit: Width
10
9.8
Arch Fit Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Arch Width TTS Deviation
-0.3 mm (-0.011")
2.2 mm (0.085")
Length Fit
10
10
Toe Clearance Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Rocker Geometry
7.6
7.4
Heel Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Spring
23 mm (0.9")
21 mm (0.8")
Heel Apex Position
21.7%
20.0%
Heel Rocker Angle
19.5°
19.3°
Forefoot Rocker Geometry
6.8
6.1
Forefoot Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe Spring
47 mm (1.9")
43 mm (1.7")
Toe Apex Position
66.7%
66.7%
Forefoot Rocker Angle
25.2°
23.3°
Foam
Primary Foam Picture
Secondary Foam Picture
Primary Foam Name
PWRRUN PB
Primary Foam Type
PEBA
Secondary Foam Name
PWRRUN
Secondary Foam Type
EVA
Laces
Laces Picture
Lace Type
Round
Width
5.0 mm (0.2")
Thickness
3.3 mm (0.1")
Stretch
14.5%
Other Features
Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Tongue Gusset Type
Fully-gusseted
Semi-gusseted
Plate
None
None
Performance
Heel Compression Energy Return
7.0
0.8
Heel Compression Video
Heel Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Heel Energy Return
76.3%
62.9%
Forefoot Compression Energy Return
8.0
1.4
Forefoot Compression Video
Forefoot Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Energy Return
80.7%
66.4%
Heel Cushioning
8.0
5.7
Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 550N
3.50 J
2.65 J
Energy Absorbed At 1100N
9.69 J
7.34 J
Energy Absorbed At 1900N
17.42 J
13.15 J
Forefoot Cushioning
8.9
6.6
Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 800N
5.71 J
3.89 J
Energy Absorbed At 1300N
10.02 J
6.92 J
Energy Absorbed At 2050N
14.70 J
10.83 J
Heel Firmness
7.4
9.2
Heel Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 550N
41.4 N/mm
58.0 N/mm
Firmness At 1100N
52.2 N/mm
71.3 N/mm
Firmness At 1900N
71.9 N/mm
97.9 N/mm
Forefoot Firmness
5.4
9.3
Forefoot Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 800N
47.7 N/mm
75.2 N/mm
Firmness At 1300N
61.9 N/mm
95.6 N/mm
Firmness At 2050N
86 N/mm
128 N/mm
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
8.1
5.2
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 10km
9.14 J
6.04 J
Energy Absorbed At 20km
8.81 J
5.69 J
Energy Absorbed At 30km
8.57 J
5.48 J
Energy Absorbed At 40km
8.41 J
5.33 J
Rocker Stiffness
7.4
7.1
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Video
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Force To Flatten The Rocker
95 N
87 N
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
7.8
4.2
Forefoot Bending Video
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
70.1%
54.2%
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
7.3
7.9
Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Bending Resistance
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
15.4 N/mm
15.3 N/mm
Forefoot Bending Force
256 N
377 N
Heel Compression Depth
6.2
Heel Compression Graph
Preview Graph
Heel Compression At 550N
13.3 mm
Heel Compression At 1100N
21.1 mm
Heel Compression At 1900N
26.4 mm
Forefoot Compression Depth
7.1
Forefoot Compression Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Compression At 800N
16.8 mm
Forefoot Compression At 1300N
21.0 mm
Forefoot Compression At 2050N
23.9 mm
Saucony Hurricane 25
On Cloudrunner 3
Comments
Saucony Hurricane 25 vs On Cloudrunner 3: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.