PUMA MagMax NITRO vs Mizuno Neo Vista 2

Which Running Shoe Is Better?

Products

PUMA MagMax NITRO
Mizuno Neo Vista 2

Tested using Methodology v0.9

Updated Oct 31, 2025 01:11 PM

SEE PRICE
PUMA

Tested using Methodology v0.9

Updated Oct 28, 2025 05:24 PM

SEE PRICE
Mizuno
  1. Recommended in 3 articles:
  2. Running Shoes
  3. For Women
  4. For Men

Our Verdict

PUMA MagMax NITRO

Mizuno Neo Vista 2

Both the PUMA MagMax NITRO and the Mizuno Neo Vista 2 stack tons of cushioning underfoot for a fun, bouncy ride. For runners who want the floating feeling of traipsing on the moon, the Mizuno is unmatched in its ability to pack soft foam underfoot without adding excess weight. For runners who want a more grounded, but still cushioned experience, the PUMA shoe offers much better stability and a firmer foundation.

0 

Variants

  • MagMax NITRO (Black/Galactic Gray - (Men - US 9))
  • MagMax NITRO (Black/Yellow Alert - (Women - US 7))
  • MagMax NITRO (Cool Weather/Silver - (Women - US 7))
  • MagMax NITRO (Green Moon/Yellow Alert - (Men - US 9))
  • MagMax NITRO (Lapis Lazuli/Nitro Blue - (Men - US 9))
  • MagMax NITRO (Mint Melt/Speed Blue - (Women - US 7))
  • Neo Vista 2 (Baritone Blue/Frozen Emerald - (Men - US 9))
  • Neo Vista 2 (Baritone Blue/Striking Coral - (Women - US 7))
  • Neo Vista 2 (White - (Men - US 9))
  • Neo Vista 2 (White/Striking Coral - (Women - US 7))

Main Differences for
Marathon Racing

Threshold 

0.10

Marathon Racing 

6.7
7.2

Plate 
 

None
Plastic

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

6.6
5.5

Weight  

4.8
5.9

Full Comparison

Design

Weight  

4.8
5.9

Right Shoe Weight Photo  

Left Shoe Weight Photo  

Weight 
 

291.0 g (10.26 oz)
263.4 g (9.29 oz)
Show Text 

Stack Heights 
 

Stack Height Photo  

Heel Stack Height 
 

45.2 mm
50.1 mm

Forefoot Stack Height 
 

36.3 mm
40.3 mm

Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

8.9 mm
9.8 mm

Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

8.0 mm
8.0 mm
Show Text 

External Shape 
 

3D Model Full Shoe  

Outsole Heel Width 
 

103 mm (4.0")
95 mm (3.8")

Outsole Arch Width 
 

81 mm (3.2")
88 mm (3.5")

Outsole Forefoot Width 
 

125 mm (4.9")
117 mm (4.6")

Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

2.28
1.89

Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

3.44
2.90
Show Text 

Internal Shape 
 

3D Model Internal  

Internal Length 
 

281 mm (11.1")
281 mm (11.1")

Internal Heel Width 
 

67 mm (2.6")
62 mm (2.4")

Internal Forefoot Width 
 

94 mm (3.7")
95 mm (3.7")

Wide Sizing Available 
 

No
No
Show Text 

Other Features  

Other Features Photo  

Tongue Gusset Type 
 

Fully-gusseted
Non-gusseted

Plate 
 

None
Plastic
Show Text 
Performance

Heel Energy Return 
 

5.1
6.0

Heel Compression Video  

Heel Energy Return  

See details
See details

Heel Energy Return 
 

72.0%
73.4%
Show Text 

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

6.6
5.5

Forefoot Compression Video  

Forefoot Energy Return  

See details
See details

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

74.9%
72.6%
Show Text 

Heel Cushioning 
 

8.8
9.2

Heel Cushioning Picture  

Heel Cushioning  

See details
See details

Energy Absorbed At 550N 
 

3.74 J
4.55 J

Energy Absorbed At 1100N 
 

11.37 J
11.67 J

Energy Absorbed At 1900N 
 

20.25 J
19.26 J
Show Text 

Forefoot Cushioning 
 

9.1
9.0

Forefoot Cushioning Picture  

Forefoot Cushioning  

See details
See details

Energy Absorbed At 800N 
 

5.65 J
5.90 J

Energy Absorbed At 1300N 
 

10.38 J
10.15 J

Energy Absorbed At 2050N 
 

15.77 J
14.54 J
Show Text 

Heel Firmness 
 

3.9
4.3

Heel Firmness  

See details
See details

Firmness At 550N 
 

43.5 N/mm
39.7 N/mm

Firmness At 1100N 
 

86.0 N/mm
98.3 N/mm

Firmness At 1900N 
 

178.3 N/mm
220.9 N/mm
Show Text 

Forefoot Firmness 
 

6.4
7.3

Forefoot Firmness  

See details
See details

Firmness At 800N 
 

78.0 N/mm
80.8 N/mm

Firmness At 1300N 
 

153.6 N/mm
184.6 N/mm

Firmness At 2050N 
 

301.3 N/mm
386.2 N/mm
Show Text 

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning 
 

8.4
7.8

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning  

See details
See details

Energy Absorbed At 10km 
 

9.49 J
8.45 J

Energy Absorbed At 20km 
 

9.20 J
8.32 J

Energy Absorbed At 30km 
 

9.02 J
8.26 J

Energy Absorbed At 40km 
 

8.89 J
8.21 J

PUMA MagMax NITRO

Mizuno Neo Vista 2

Comments

  1. Comparison

PUMA MagMax NITRO vs Mizuno Neo Vista 2: Main Discussion

What do you think of these products? Let us know below.


Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Insiders have direct access to buying advice on our insider forum.

PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
No comments yet, refresh to see new ones