Products
Tested using Methodology v0.12
Updated Jun 16, 2026 05:24 PM
SEE PRICE
Saucony
Tested using Methodology v0.12
Updated Jun 16, 2026 05:41 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Weight
201.9 g (7.12 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
8.0 mm
Plate
Carbon Fiber
Weight
205.1 g (7.23 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
5.4 mm
Plate
Carbon Fiber
Our Verdict
Saucony Endorphin Elite 2
Li-Ning Feidian 6 Elite
The Li-Ning Feidian 6 Elite and Saucony Endorphin Elite 2 are two plush super shoes with very similar weight, but they achieve efficiency in slightly different ways. On one end, the Saucony uses a plate that extends further into the toe-off phase, creating a more aggressive rolling sensation. That said, the Li-Ning feels marginally more responsive and propulsive overall, while also delivering greater impact absorption in its midsole, giving it a more protective ride over longer distances.
Variants
- Endorphin Elite 2 (Buttercream/Ash - (Men - US 9))
- Endorphin Elite 2 (Buttercream/Ash - (Women - US 7))
- Feidian 6 Elite (Neon Lime - (Men - US 9))
- Feidian 6 Elite (Standard White - (Men - US 9))
Main Differences for
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Threshold
Half/Full Marathon Racing
8.1
8.4
Full Comparison
Design
Weight
8.1
8.0
Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Weight
201.9 g (7.12 oz)
205.1 g (7.23 oz)
Stack Heights
Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Stack Height
40.0 mm
39.7 mm
Forefoot Stack Height
32.3 mm
34.3 mm
Heel-To-Toe Drop
8.0 mm
5.4 mm
Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
7.7 mm
6.0 mm
External Shape
3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Outsole Heel Width
87 mm (3.4")
84 mm (3.3")
Outsole Arch Width
55 mm (2.2")
74 mm (2.9")
Outsole Forefoot Width
112 mm (4.4")
115 mm (4.5")
Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
2.18
2.16
Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
3.47
3.35
Internal Shape
3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Internal Length
273 mm (10.7")
278 mm (10.9")
Internal Heel Width
55 mm (2.2")
60 mm (2.4")
Internal Forefoot Width
90 mm (3.5")
91 mm (3.6")
Wide Sizing Available
No
No
Forefoot Fit: Width
9.8
9.8
Forefoot Width Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation
0.2 mm (0.006")
1.5 mm (0.057")
Toe TTS Deviation
-1.5 mm (-0.061")
-0.2 mm (-0.009")
Forefoot Fit: Height
10
10
Forefoot Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe TTS Deviation
-0.2 mm (-0.008")
-0.1 mm (-0.006")
Arch Fit: Width
9.4
4.4
Arch Fit Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Arch Width TTS Deviation
-1.3 mm (-0.050")
-7.5 mm (-0.295")
Length Fit
7.0
10
Toe Clearance Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Rocker Geometry
7.9
8.0
Heel Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Spring
26 mm (1.0")
25 mm (1.0")
Heel Apex Position
15.8%
18.1%
Heel Rocker Angle
30.0°
26.6°
Forefoot Rocker Geometry
8.0
8.3
Forefoot Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe Spring
60 mm (2.4")
60 mm (2.4")
Toe Apex Position
70.2%
63.8%
Forefoot Rocker Angle
35.2°
31.0°
Other Features
Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Tongue Gusset Type
Non-gusseted
Semi-gusseted
Plate
Carbon Fiber
Carbon Fiber
Performance
Heel Compression Energy Return
8.8
8.9
Heel Compression Video
Heel Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Heel Energy Return
85.8%
86.8%
Forefoot Compression Energy Return
8.8
8.9
Forefoot Compression Video
Forefoot Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Energy Return
86.4%
87.4%
Heel Cushioning
8.4
8.9
Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 550N
4.68 J
4.68 J
Energy Absorbed At 1100N
10.06 J
10.86 J
Energy Absorbed At 1900N
15.62 J
17.57 J
Forefoot Cushioning
8.2
9.1
Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 800N
5.50 J
5.99 J
Energy Absorbed At 1300N
8.88 J
10.35 J
Energy Absorbed At 2050N
12.56 J
15.29 J
Heel Firmness
5.2
5.1
Heel Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 550N
29.9 N/mm
30.9 N/mm
Firmness At 1100N
43.4 N/mm
42.8 N/mm
Firmness At 1900N
65.1 N/mm
62.6 N/mm
Forefoot Firmness
5.4
4.9
Forefoot Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 800N
45.5 N/mm
45.6 N/mm
Firmness At 1300N
62.2 N/mm
59.6 N/mm
Firmness At 2050N
88 N/mm
82 N/mm
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
7.9
8.7
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 10km
8.60 J
9.74 J
Energy Absorbed At 20km
8.52 J
9.60 J
Energy Absorbed At 30km
8.47 J
9.52 J
Energy Absorbed At 40km
8.43 J
9.46 J
Rocker Stiffness
7.8
8.1
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Video
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Force To Flatten The Rocker
111 N
124 N
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
8.9
8.9
Forefoot Bending Video
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
80.1%
80.5%
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
7.6
7.9
Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Bending Resistance
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
20.3 N/mm
21.4 N/mm
Forefoot Bending Force
257 N
275 N
To access
Become a member
unlimited full product reviews,
product prices, and
other exclusive site features
Saucony Endorphin Elite 2
Li-Ning Feidian 6 Elite
Comments
Saucony Endorphin Elite 2 vs Li-Ning Feidian 6 Elite: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.