Products
Tested using Methodology v0.14
Updated Sep 17, 2026 05:20 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Tested using Methodology v0.12
Updated Jul 21, 2026 08:19 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Heel Stack Height
40.7 mm
Weight
292.9 g (10.33 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
4.4 mm
Plate
None
Heel Stack Height
36.2 mm
Weight
294.5 g (10.39 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
6.7 mm
Plate
None
Our Verdict
Saucony Hurricane 25
Saucony Guide 19
The Saucony Hurricane 25 is a better shoe than the Saucony Guide 19 for most runners. It's much more cushioned and bouncier, making it the pick for runners who want a comfortable stability shoe for daily training and long runs. The Guide 19 is firmer and noticeably more stable, with a wider base under the arch, so it's the better choice for runners whose feet tend to roll inward and who need as much support as possible.
Variants
- Hurricane 25 (Arctic/White - (Men - US 9))
- Hurricane 25 (Black/Black/Black - (Women - US 7))
- Guide 19 (Birch - (Women - US 7))
- Guide 19 (Black/Black/Black - (Men - US 9))
Main Differences for
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Threshold
Half/Full Marathon Racing
7.2
6.2
Heel Stack Height
40.7 mm
36.2 mm
Forefoot Compression Energy Return
8.0
5.6
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
8.1
6.8
Rocker Stiffness
7.4
4.2
Forefoot Stack Height
36.2 mm
29.5 mm
Heel Compression Energy Return
7.0
1.9
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
7.8
6.7
Full Comparison
Design
Weight
4.7
4.6
Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Weight
292.9 g (10.33 oz)
294.5 g (10.39 oz)
Stack Heights
Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Stack Height
40.7 mm
36.2 mm
Forefoot Stack Height
36.2 mm
29.5 mm
Heel-To-Toe Drop
4.4 mm
6.7 mm
Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
6.0 mm
6.0 mm
External Shape
3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Outsole Heel Width
101 mm (4.0")
103 mm (4.1")
Outsole Arch Width
79 mm (3.1")
88 mm (3.5")
Outsole Forefoot Width
124 mm (4.9")
121 mm (4.8")
Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
2.49
2.84
Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
3.43
4.10
Internal Shape
3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Internal Length
280 mm (11.0")
282 mm (11.1")
Internal Heel Width
66 mm (2.6")
65 mm (2.6")
Internal Forefoot Width
91 mm (3.6")
92 mm (3.6")
Wide Sizing Available
Yes
Yes
Forefoot Fit: Width
9.8
9.4
Forefoot Width Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation
1.7 mm (0.065")
3.0 mm (0.118")
Toe TTS Deviation
-0.3 mm (-0.013")
1.7 mm (0.067")
Forefoot Fit: Height
7.3
7.1
Forefoot Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe TTS Deviation
-3.3 mm (-0.128")
-3.5 mm (-0.139")
Arch Fit: Width
10
9.8
Arch Fit Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Arch Width TTS Deviation
-0.3 mm (-0.011")
2.2 mm (0.088")
Length Fit
10
10
Toe Clearance Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Rocker Geometry
7.6
8.0
Heel Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Spring
23 mm (0.9")
30 mm (1.2")
Heel Apex Position
21.7%
28.9%
Heel Rocker Angle
19.5°
19.2°
Forefoot Rocker Geometry
6.8
6.4
Forefoot Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe Spring
47 mm (1.9")
44 mm (1.7")
Toe Apex Position
66.7%
63.1%
Forefoot Rocker Angle
25.2°
21.8°
Foam
Primary Foam Picture
Secondary Foam Picture
Primary Foam Name
PWRRUN PB
Primary Foam Type
PEBA
Secondary Foam Name
PWRRUN
Secondary Foam Type
EVA
Laces
Laces Picture
Lace Type
Round
Width
5.0 mm (0.2")
Thickness
3.3 mm (0.1")
Stretch
14.5%
Other Features
Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Tongue Gusset Type
Fully-gusseted
Fully-gusseted
Plate
None
None
Performance
Heel Compression Energy Return
7.0
1.9
Heel Compression Video
Heel Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Heel Energy Return
76.3%
67.5%
Forefoot Compression Energy Return
8.0
5.6
Forefoot Compression Video
Forefoot Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Energy Return
80.7%
72.8%
Heel Cushioning
8.0
7.0
Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 550N
3.50 J
3.20 J
Energy Absorbed At 1100N
9.69 J
8.58 J
Energy Absorbed At 1900N
17.42 J
14.98 J
Forefoot Cushioning
8.9
7.3
Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 800N
5.71 J
4.66 J
Energy Absorbed At 1300N
10.02 J
7.75 J
Energy Absorbed At 2050N
14.70 J
11.24 J
Heel Firmness
7.4
8.4
Heel Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 550N
41.4 N/mm
46.3 N/mm
Firmness At 1100N
52.2 N/mm
58.9 N/mm
Firmness At 1900N
71.9 N/mm
82.2 N/mm
Forefoot Firmness
5.4
8.4
Forefoot Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 800N
47.7 N/mm
57.9 N/mm
Firmness At 1300N
61.9 N/mm
77.2 N/mm
Firmness At 2050N
86 N/mm
108 N/mm
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
8.1
6.8
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 10km
9.14 J
7.52 J
Energy Absorbed At 20km
8.81 J
7.24 J
Energy Absorbed At 30km
8.57 J
7.08 J
Energy Absorbed At 40km
8.41 J
6.97 J
Rocker Stiffness
7.4
4.2
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Video
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Force To Flatten The Rocker
95 N
32 N
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
7.8
6.7
Forefoot Bending Video
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
70.1%
63.3%
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
7.3
7.4
Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Bending Resistance
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
15.4 N/mm
18.2 N/mm
Forefoot Bending Force
256 N
245 N
Saucony Hurricane 25
Saucony Guide 19
Comments
Saucony Hurricane 25 vs Saucony Guide 19: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.