Products
Tested using Methodology v1.0
Updated Oct 27, 2026 04:30 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Tested using Methodology v0.15
Updated Oct 16, 2026 02:40 PM
SEE PRICE
Saucony
Heel Stack Height
46.6 mm
Weight
232.6 g (8.20 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
7.1 mm
Plate
None
Heel Stack Height
45.8 mm
Weight
277.4 g (9.79 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
8.3 mm
Plate
None
Our Verdict
ASICS SUPERBLAST 3
Saucony Paramount Max
The Saucony Paramount Max and ASICS SUPERBLAST 3 are both excellent max-cushion shoes, with neither clearly winning. The Saucony is much bouncier and significantly more energetic, with a more assistive heel rocker that better suits heel strikers. The ASICS is much lighter and rolls more smoothly, making it the better option for progressive efforts and runners who want less shoe on foot.
Variants
- SUPERBLAST 3 (Cobalt Burst/Light Orange - (Men - US 9))
- SUPERBLAST 3 (Seashell/Sun Coral - (Men - US 9))
- Paramount Max (Black/Shadow - (Men - US 9))
- Paramount Max (Black/Shadow - (Women - US 7))
Main Differences for
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Threshold
Half/Full Marathon Racing
8.0
7.6
Weight
7.1
5.3
Full Comparison
Design
Weight
7.1
5.3
Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Weight
232.6 g (8.20 oz)
277.4 g (9.79 oz)
Stack Heights
Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Stack Height
46.6 mm
45.8 mm
Forefoot Stack Height
39.5 mm
37.5 mm
Heel-To-Toe Drop
7.1 mm
8.3 mm
Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
8.0 mm
6.0 mm
External Shape
3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Outsole Heel Width
96 mm (3.8")
105 mm (4.1")
Outsole Arch Width
79 mm (3.1")
85 mm (3.3")
Outsole Forefoot Width
119 mm (4.7")
130 mm (5.1")
Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
2.06
2.29
Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
3.01
3.47
Internal Shape
3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Internal Length
280 mm (11.0")
279 mm (11.0")
Internal Heel Width
67 mm (2.6")
65 mm (2.6")
Internal Forefoot Width
91 mm (3.6")
94 mm (3.7")
Wide Sizing Available
No
No
Forefoot Fit: Width
10
9.1
Forefoot Width Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation
-0.3 mm (-0.010")
2.3 mm (0.091")
Toe TTS Deviation
-0.2 mm (-0.009")
-2.5 mm (-0.099")
Forefoot Fit: Height
7.8
5.0
Forefoot Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe TTS Deviation
-2.7 mm (-0.106")
-5.9 mm (-0.233")
Arch Fit: Width
6.0
9.2
Arch Fit Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Arch Width TTS Deviation
-5.8 mm (-0.229")
-1.6 mm (-0.062")
Length Fit
10
10
Toe Clearance Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Rocker Geometry
7.2
8.6
Heel Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Spring
20 mm (0.8")
34 mm (1.3")
Heel Apex Position
20.0%
22.0%
Heel Rocker Angle
18.4°
26.9°
Forefoot Rocker Geometry
7.7
7.2
Forefoot Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe Spring
55 mm (2.2")
51 mm (2.0")
Toe Apex Position
66.7%
67.2%
Forefoot Rocker Angle
28.8°
27.0°
Foam
Primary Foam Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Secondary Foam Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Primary Foam Name
FF LEAP
IncrediRUN
Primary Foam Type
A-TPU
TPEE
Secondary Foam Name
FF BLAST PLUS
No Secondary Foam
Secondary Foam Type
Unknown
No Secondary Foam
Laces
Laces Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Lace Type
Flat
Flat
Width
5.0 mm (0.2")
6.0 mm (0.2")
Thickness
1.7 mm (0.1")
1.8 mm (0.1")
Stretch
15.0%
16.5%
Breathability
7.5
Breathability Video
Upper Breathability
Upper Microscope Photo
Time-To-Dry
6.8
Time-To-Dry Timelapse
Time-To-Dry Graph
Preview Graph
Time To 30% Dry
7.6 hrs
Time To 70% Dry
18.9 hrs
Time To Dry
28.8 hrs
Water Absorption
7.3
Dry Weight Photo
Wet Weight Photo
Water Absorbed
43.7%
Other Features
Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Tongue Gusset Type
Fully-gusseted
Semi-gusseted
Plate
None
None
Performance
Heel Compression Energy Return
7.7
8.3
Heel Compression Video
Heel Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Heel Energy Return
79.2%
82.4%
Forefoot Compression Energy Return
7.9
8.9
Forefoot Compression Video
Forefoot Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Energy Return
80.4%
87.1%
Heel Cushioning
9.3
9.3
Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 550N
4.47 J
4.64 J
Energy Absorbed At 1100N
11.96 J
11.81 J
Energy Absorbed At 1900N
20.73 J
19.75 J
Forefoot Cushioning
9.5
9.4
Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 800N
6.85 J
6.57 J
Energy Absorbed At 1300N
11.71 J
11.04 J
Energy Absorbed At 2050N
17.03 J
15.79 J
Heel Firmness
5.1
4.7
Heel Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 550N
34.3 N/mm
31.0 N/mm
Firmness At 1100N
43.1 N/mm
41.0 N/mm
Firmness At 1900N
60.2 N/mm
58.8 N/mm
Forefoot Firmness
4.0
3.9
Forefoot Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 800N
41.8 N/mm
40.3 N/mm
Firmness At 1300N
54.4 N/mm
53.6 N/mm
Firmness At 2050N
75 N/mm
75 N/mm
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
9.1
9.1
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 10km
10.71 J
10.65 J
Energy Absorbed At 20km
10.42 J
10.51 J
Energy Absorbed At 30km
10.25 J
10.43 J
Energy Absorbed At 40km
10.10 J
10.35 J
Rocker Stiffness
7.7
7.1
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Video
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Force To Flatten The Rocker
107 N
88 N
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
7.5
8.7
Forefoot Bending Video
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
68.0%
77.6%
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
6.7
6.2
Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Bending Resistance
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
12.1 N/mm
11.8 N/mm
Forefoot Bending Force
239 N
210 N
Forefoot Compression Depth
8.0
8.2
Forefoot Compression Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Compression At 800N
19.1 mm
19.8 mm
Forefoot Compression At 1300N
23.9 mm
24.2 mm
Forefoot Compression At 2050N
27.2 mm
27.2 mm
Heel Compression Depth
7.6
8.0
Heel Compression Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Heel Compression At 550N
16.0 mm
17.7 mm
Heel Compression At 1100N
25.5 mm
26.8 mm
Heel Compression At 1900N
31.6 mm
32.3 mm
Dry Concrete Grip
8.9
Dry Concrete Forefoot Video
Dry Concrete Forefoot Graph
Preview Graph
Sliding Force
260.6 N (58.6 lbf)
Coefficient Of Friction
1.01
Wet Concrete Grip
9.0
Wet Concrete Forefoot Video
Wet Concrete Forefoot Graph
Preview Graph
Sliding Force
266.4 N (59.9 lbf)
Coefficient Of Friction
1.04
Wet Aluminum Grip
7.4
Wet Aluminum Forefoot Video
Wet Aluminum Forefoot Graph
Preview Graph
Sliding Force
132.3 N (29.7 lbf)
Coefficient Of Friction
0.80
Gravel Grip
3.9
Gravel Forefoot Video
Gravel Forefoot Graph
Preview Graph
Sliding Force
65.9 N (14.8 lbf)
Coefficient Of Friction
0.40
Mud Grip
6.7
Mud Forefoot Video
Mud Forefoot Graph
Preview Graph
Sliding Force
117.9 N (26.5 lbf)
Coefficient Of Friction
0.71
Exposed Foam
6.0
Outsole Photo
Heel Exposed Foam
6.0
Forefoot Exposed Foam
6.0
Outsole Abrasion Wear
8.0
Outsole Durability Video
Outsole Durability Photo
Heel Abrasion Wear
8.0
Forefoot Abrasion Wear
8.0
ASICS SUPERBLAST 3
Saucony Paramount Max
Comments
ASICS SUPERBLAST 3 vs Saucony Paramount Max: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.