XTEP 260X 3.0 vs ANTA C202 7

Which Running Shoe Is Better?

Products

XTEP 260X 3.0
ANTA C202 7

Tested using Methodology v0.15

Updated Jul 30, 2026 01:30 PM

DicksSportingGoods.com

Tested using Methodology v0.13

Updated Sep 02, 2026 05:50 PM

SEE PRICE
Amazon
XTEP 260X 3.0 Picture

Track

ANTA C202 7 Picture

Track

Our Verdict

XTEP 260X 3.0

ANTA C202 7

The ANTA C202 7  and XTEP 260X 3.0 are two lightweight, carbon-plated trainers that you can use both on race day and in the training leading up to it, but the best choice depends on the distance. The XTEP shoe is very snappy and has impressive energy return, so it's a great shoe for racing a 5k or 10k. The ANTA trades some energy return for better cushioning and uses a more pronounced rocker to assist with turnover. It has the versatility to cover a wide range of distances, but its comparative advantage over the XTEP is in longer races like the half or full marathon.

0 

Variants

  • 260X 3.0 (Blue - (Women - US 7))
  • 260X 3.0 (Orange - (Men - US 9))
  • C202 7 (Black/Silver - (Men - US 9))
  • C202 7 (Black/Silver - (Women - US 7))
Read more

Main Differences for
Half/Full Marathon Racing

Threshold 

0.10

Half/Full Marathon Racing 
 

7.1
7.9

Forefoot Stack Height 
 

26.4 mm
30.3 mm

Heel Stack Height 
 

36.8 mm
37.8 mm

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning 
 

6.1
7.4

Full Comparison

Design

Weight  

7.6
7.7

Right Shoe Weight Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
XTEP 260X 3.0 Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
ANTA C202 7 Right Shoe Weight Photo

Left Shoe Weight Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
XTEP 260X 3.0 Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
ANTA C202 7 Left Shoe Weight Photo

Weight 
 

216.0 g (7.62 oz)
212.9 g (7.51 oz)

Stack Heights 
 

Stack Height Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
XTEP 260X 3.0 Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
ANTA C202 7 Stack Height Photo

Heel Stack Height 
 

36.8 mm
37.8 mm

Forefoot Stack Height 
 

26.4 mm
30.3 mm

Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

10.4 mm
7.5 mm

Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

6.0 mm
8.0 mm

External Shape 
 

3D Model Full Shoe  

Preview 3D
XTEP 260X 3.0 3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
ANTA C202 7 3D Model Full Shoe

Outsole Heel Width 
 

80 mm (3.1")
84 mm (3.3")

Outsole Arch Width 
 

63 mm (2.5")
64 mm (2.5")

Outsole Forefoot Width 
 

113 mm (4.4")
108 mm (4.3")

Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

2.17
2.22

Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

4.28
3.56

Internal Shape 
 

3D Model Internal  

Preview 3D
XTEP 260X 3.0 3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
ANTA C202 7 3D Model Internal

Internal Length 
 

279 mm (11.0")
272 mm (10.7")

Internal Heel Width 
 

62 mm (2.4")
64 mm (2.5")

Internal Forefoot Width 
 

92 mm (3.6")
91 mm (3.6")

Wide Sizing Available 
 

No
No

Forefoot Fit: Width 
 

9.4
9.1

Forefoot Width Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
XTEP 260X 3.0 Forefoot Width Photo
Compare High-Res
ANTA C202 7 Forefoot Width Photo

Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation 
 

2.9 mm (0.113")
4.1 mm (0.163")

Toe TTS Deviation 
 

2.7 mm (0.106")
1.3 mm (0.049")

Forefoot Fit: Height 
 

8.1
7.9

Forefoot Height Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
XTEP 260X 3.0 Forefoot Height Photo
Compare High-Res
ANTA C202 7 Forefoot Height Photo

Toe TTS Deviation 
 

-2.3 mm (-0.092")
-2.6 mm (-0.100")

Arch Fit: Width 
 

8.7
4.7

Arch Fit Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
XTEP 260X 3.0 Arch Fit Photo
Compare High-Res
ANTA C202 7 Arch Fit Photo

Arch Width TTS Deviation 
 

-2.3 mm (-0.092")
-7.3 mm (-0.285")

Length Fit 
 

10
7.0

Toe Clearance Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
XTEP 260X 3.0 Toe Clearance Photo
Compare High-Res
ANTA C202 7 Toe Clearance Photo

Heel Rocker Geometry 
 

7.0
8.1

Heel Rocker Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
XTEP 260X 3.0 Heel Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
ANTA C202 7 Heel Rocker Photo

Heel Spring 
 

19 mm (0.7")
27 mm (1.1")

Heel Apex Position 
 

20.1%
17.4%

Heel Rocker Angle 
 

17.9°
28.4°

Forefoot Rocker Geometry 
 

7.6
7.9

Forefoot Rocker Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
XTEP 260X 3.0 Forefoot Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
ANTA C202 7 Forefoot Rocker Photo

Toe Spring 
 

53 mm (2.1")
56 mm (2.2")

Toe Apex Position 
 

62.6%
63.4%

Forefoot Rocker Angle 
 

25.7°
28.1°

Foam 
 

Primary Foam Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
XTEP 260X 3.0 Primary Foam Picture
Compare High-Res
ANTA C202 7 Primary Foam Picture

Secondary Foam Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
XTEP 260X 3.0 Secondary Foam Picture
Compare High-Res
ANTA C202 7 Secondary Foam Picture

Primary Foam Name 
 

XTEP ACE+

Primary Foam Name 
 

Not Advertised

Primary Foam Type 
 

PEBA
Unknown

Secondary Foam Name 
 

XTEP POWER

Secondary Foam Name 
 

No Secondary Foam

Secondary Foam Type 
 

ETPU
No Secondary Foam

Laces 
 

Laces Picture  

XTEP 260X 3.0 Laces Picture

Lace Type 
 

Sawtooth

Width 
 

5.0 mm (0.2")

Thickness 
 

1.1 mm (0.0")

Stretch 
 

8.0%

Other Features  

Other Features Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
XTEP 260X 3.0 Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
ANTA C202 7 Other Features Photo

Tongue Gusset Type 
 

Semi-gusseted
Non-gusseted

Plate 
 

Carbon Fiber
Carbon Fiber
Performance

Heel Compression Energy Return 
 

7.9
7.2

Heel Compression Video  

Heel Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
XTEP 260X 3.0 Heel Energy Return
 Preview Graph
ANTA C202 7 Heel Energy Return

Heel Energy Return 
 

80.3%
76.7%

Forefoot Compression Energy Return 
 

8.3
7.6

Forefoot Compression Video  

Forefoot Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
XTEP 260X 3.0 Forefoot Energy Return
 Preview Graph
ANTA C202 7 Forefoot Energy Return

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

82.3%
78.6%

Heel Cushioning 
 

7.2
8.2

Heel Cushioning Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
XTEP 260X 3.0 Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
ANTA C202 7 Heel Cushioning Picture

Heel Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
XTEP 260X 3.0 Heel Cushioning
 Preview Graph
ANTA C202 7 Heel Cushioning

Energy Absorbed At 550N 
 

3.30 J
4.21 J

Energy Absorbed At 1100N 
 

9.06 J
9.90 J

Energy Absorbed At 1900N 
 

15.11 J
15.90 J

Forefoot Cushioning 
 

6.5
7.9

Forefoot Cushioning Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
XTEP 260X 3.0 Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
ANTA C202 7 Forefoot Cushioning Picture

Forefoot Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
XTEP 260X 3.0 Forefoot Cushioning
 Preview Graph
ANTA C202 7 Forefoot Cushioning

Energy Absorbed At 800N 
 

4.20 J
4.94 J

Energy Absorbed At 1300N 
 

6.98 J
8.46 J

Energy Absorbed At 2050N 
 

9.95 J
12.50 J

Heel Firmness 
 

8.1
6.7

Heel Firmness Graph  

 Preview Graph
XTEP 260X 3.0 Heel Firmness Graph
 Preview Graph
ANTA C202 7 Heel Firmness Graph

Firmness At 550N 
 

44.2 N/mm
36.3 N/mm

Firmness At 1100N 
 

55.7 N/mm
49.0 N/mm

Firmness At 1900N 
 

79.4 N/mm
71.4 N/mm

Forefoot Firmness 
 

8.8
7.6

Forefoot Firmness Graph  

 Preview Graph
XTEP 260X 3.0 Forefoot Firmness Graph
 Preview Graph
ANTA C202 7 Forefoot Firmness Graph

Firmness At 800N 
 

61.5 N/mm
54.0 N/mm

Firmness At 1300N 
 

82.6 N/mm
71.2 N/mm

Firmness At 2050N 
 

117 N/mm
99 N/mm

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning 
 

6.1
7.4

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
XTEP 260X 3.0 Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
 Preview Graph
ANTA C202 7 Forefoot Long Run Cushioning

Energy Absorbed At 10km 
 

6.62 J
8.03 J

Energy Absorbed At 20km 
 

6.49 J
7.89 J

Energy Absorbed At 30km 
 

6.41 J
7.79 J

Energy Absorbed At 40km 
 

6.35 J
7.71 J

Rocker Stiffness 
 

7.8
8.7

Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Video  

Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph  

 Preview Graph
XTEP 260X 3.0 Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph
 Preview Graph
ANTA C202 7 Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph

Force To Flatten The Rocker 
 

110 N
151 N

Forefoot Bending Energy Return 
 

8.3
7.3

Forefoot Bending Video  

Forefoot Bending Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
XTEP 260X 3.0 Forefoot Bending Energy Return
 Preview Graph
ANTA C202 7 Forefoot Bending Energy Return

Forefoot Bending Energy Return 
 

74.1%
66.6%

Forefoot Bending Stiffness 
 

8.5
8.8

Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
XTEP 260X 3.0 Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture
Compare High-Res
ANTA C202 7 Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture

Forefoot Bending Resistance  

 Preview Graph
XTEP 260X 3.0 Forefoot Bending Resistance
 Preview Graph
ANTA C202 7 Forefoot Bending Resistance

Forefoot Bending Stiffness 
 

25.1 N/mm
29.3 N/mm

Forefoot Bending Force 
 

357 N
392 N

Heel Compression Depth 
 

5.8

Heel Compression Graph  

 Preview Graph
XTEP 260X 3.0 Heel Compression Graph

Heel Compression At 550N 
 

12.4 mm

Heel Compression At 1100N 
 

19.7 mm

Heel Compression At 1900N 
 

23.9 mm

Forefoot Compression Depth 
 

5.4

Forefoot Compression Graph  

 Preview Graph
XTEP 260X 3.0 Forefoot Compression Graph

Forefoot Compression At 800N 
 

13.0 mm

Forefoot Compression At 1300N 
 

15.7 mm

Forefoot Compression At 2050N 
 

17.6 mm

XTEP 260X 3.0

ANTA C202 7

Comments

  1. Comparison

XTEP 260X 3.0 vs ANTA C202 7: Main Discussion

What do you think of these products? Let us know below.


Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.

PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
No comments yet, refresh to see new ones