DreamCloud Premier Rest Hybrid vs Boring Mattress

Which Mattress Is Better?

Products

DreamCloud Premier Rest Hybrid
Boring Mattress

Tested using Methodology v1.0.1

Updated Oct 21, 2025 04:59 PM

SEE PRICE
DreamCloud

Tested using Methodology v1.0.1

Updated Oct 08, 2025 04:27 PM

SEE PRICE
Boring

Our Verdict

DreamCloud Premier Rest Hybrid

Boring Mattress

The Boring Mattress is a better choice than the DreamCloud Premier Rest Hybrid. The biggest jump in quality is found in edge support. When you sleep near the edge of the DreamCloud, you feel like you could slip off, while the Boring provides much more support in this area. Beyond this aspect, the medium Boring outperforms the medium-plush DreamCloud in every area, though by a smaller margin. It also uses good-quality foam, while the DreamCloud uses mostly low-quality foam, which you can expect to sag and form indents sooner.

0 

Variants

  • Premier Rest Hybrid (Queen)
  • Mattress (Queen)

Check Price

Queen
Premier Rest Hybrid
SEE PRICE
DreamCloud
Queen
Mattress
SEE PRICE
Boring

Main Differences for
Sleeping (In Development)

Threshold 

0.10

Sleeping (In Development) 

7.4
8.5

Edge Support 
 

5.1
8.8

Full Comparison

Design

Style 
 

Style Picture  

Mattress Type 
 

Hybrid
Hybrid

Bed-In-A-Box 
 

Yes
Yes

Quilted Top Layer 
 

Yes
No

Grab Handles 
 

Yes
No

Thickness  

35.7 cm (14.1")
25.4 cm (10.0")
Show Text 
Performance

Firmness 
 

Head/Feet Firmness  

See details
See details

Lumbar Firmness  

See details
See details

Firmness Video  

Normalized Stiffness @ Head/Feet 
 

35 Pa/mm
42 Pa/mm

Normalized Stiffness @ Lumbar 
 

36 Pa/mm
46 Pa/mm

Firmness Level 
 

Medium-Plush (36 Pa/mm)
Medium (46 Pa/mm)
Show Text 

Bounciness 
 

Bounciness Video  

Maximum Rebound Height 
 

7.5 cm (3.0")
19.0 cm (7.5")

Bounciness Level 
 

Low (8 cm)
Moderate (19 cm)
Show Text 

Sinking & Contouring 
 

Sinking & Contouring Picture  

Sinking Depth 
 

5.3 cm (2.1")
4.7 cm (1.8")

Diameter Of Distortion 
 

28.6 cm (11.2")
27.6 cm (10.9")

Sinking Level 
 

Moderate (5 cm)
Moderate (5 cm)

Contouring Level 
 

Low (29 cm)
Moderate (28 cm)
Show Text 

Responsiveness 
 

7.7
9.1

Responsiveness Video  

Response Time 
 

1.0 s
0.5 s
Show Text 

Motion Isolation 
 

8.5
8.5

Motion Isolation Video  

Head/Feet Motion Isolation  

See details
See details

Lumbar Motion Isolation  

See details
See details

Peak Acceleration @ Head/Feet 
 

1.16 g
0.56 g

Dissipation Time @ Head/Feet 
 

0.44 s
0.34 s

Peak Acceleration @ Lumbar 
 

2.54 g
3.09 g

Dissipation Time @ Lumbar 
 

0.36 s
0.28 s
Show Text 

Edge Support 
 

5.1
8.8

Naturalistic Loading Pad Video  

Naturalistic Loading Pad  

See details
See details

Small Platen  

See details
See details

Naturalistic Loading Pad Indentation 
 

186 mm
131 mm

Small Platen Indentation @ 0 mm From Edge 
 

208 mm
154 mm

Small Platen Indentation @ 150 mm From Edge 
 

164 mm
142 mm

Increased Indentation @ Mattress Edge 
 

43 mm
13 mm
Show Text 

Cooling 
 

8.0
8.1

Cooling Graph  

See details
See details

Energy Transferred Over 1st Hour 
 

63 kJ
59 kJ

Energy Transferred Over 8 Hours 
 

173 kJ
181 kJ
Show Text 
Components

Cover 
 

Cover Picture  

Sleeping Surface Material 
 

Polyester, Rayon
Polyester, Spandex

Removable 
 

No
Yes

Machine Washable 
 

No
No
Show Text 

Edge Construction 
 

Edge Support Picture  

Edge Component 
 

Pocket Coils
Polyfoam
Show Text 

Foam Layer Material 
 

Foam Layer Material Picture  

Quilted Top Fill  

Memory Foam + Polyfoam + Fiber Fill
N/A

Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

Memory Foam
Polyfoam

Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

Memory Foam
Polyfoam

Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

N/A
N/A

Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

N/A
N/A

Transition Foam  

Polyfoam
Memory Foam

Support Foam  

N/A
N/A
Show Text 

Foam Layer Mass Density 
 

6.3
7.4

Quilted Top Fill  

43 kg/m³ (2.7 lb/cu.ft.)
N/A

Quilted Top Fill Foam Density vs. Reference 
 

0.7
N/A

Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

35 kg/m³ (2.2 lb/cu.ft.)
44 kg/m³ (2.7 lb/cu.ft.)

Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet Density vs. Reference 
 

0.5
1.9

Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

35 kg/m³ (2.2 lb/cu.ft.)
44 kg/m³ (2.7 lb/cu.ft.)

Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar Density vs. Reference 
 

0.5
1.9

Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

N/A
N/A

Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet Density vs. Reference 
 

N/A
N/A

Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

N/A
N/A

Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar Density vs. Reference 
 

N/A
N/A

Transition Foam  

30 kg/m³ (1.9 lb/cu.ft.)
68 kg/m³ (4.2 lb/cu.ft.)

Transition Foam Density vs. Reference 
 

1.0
1.1

Support Foam  

N/A
N/A

Support Foam Density vs Reference 
 

N/A
N/A
Show Text 

Foam Layer Thickness 
 

Foam Layer Thickness Picture  

Quilted Top 
 

4.5 cm (1.8")
N/A

Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

5.0 cm (2.0")
5.0 cm (2.0")

Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

5.0 cm (2.0")
5.0 cm (2.0")

Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

N/A
N/A

Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

N/A
N/A

Transition Foam  

5.0 cm (2.0")
2.5 cm (1.0")

Support Foam  

N/A
N/A
Show Text 

Spring Layer Dimensions 
 

Spring Layer Height Picture  

Spring Layer Density Picture  

Comfort Layer Height 
 

N/A
N/A

Comfort Layer Coil Density 
 

N/A
N/A

Comfort Layer Coil Gauge 
 

N/A
N/A

Support Layer Height 
 

20.5 cm (8.1")
15.9 cm (6.3")

Support Layer Coil Density 
 

256 coils/m² (24 coils/ft²)
256 coils/m² (24 coils/ft²)

Support Layer Coil Gauge @ Head/Feet 
 

15 gauge
14 gauge

Support Layer Coil Gauge @ Lumbar 
 

15 gauge
14 gauge
Show Text 

Foam Layer Firmness 
 

Comfort Layer IPD  

See details
See details

Transition & Support Layer IPD  

See details
See details

Quilted Top Fill 25% IPD 
 

2.3 kPa
N/A

Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet 25% IPD 
 

1.5 kPa
1.9 kPa

Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar 25% IPD 
 

1.5 kPa
1.9 kPa

Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet 25% IPD 
 

N/A
N/A

Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar 25% IPD 
 

N/A
N/A

Transition Foam 25% IPD 
 

2.6 kPa
3.0 kPa

Support Foam 25% IPD 
 

N/A
N/A
Show Text 

Spring Layer Firmness 
 

Comfort Layer Firmness  

Support Layer Firmness  

See details
See details

Spring Layer Firmness  

Normalized Comfort Layer Stiffness @ Head/Feet 
 

N/A
N/A

Normalized Comfort Layer Stiffness @ Lumbar 
 

N/A
N/A

Normalized Support Layer Stiffness @ Head/Feet 
 

56 Pa/mm
68 Pa/mm

Normalized Support Layer Stiffness @ Lumbar 
 

53 Pa/mm
75 Pa/mm
Show Text 

Foam Layer Resilience 
 

Foam Layer Resilience Video  

Quilted Top Fill  

11%
N/A

Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

8%
22%

Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

8%
22%

Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

N/A
N/A

Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

N/A
N/A

Transition Foam  

48%
2%

Support Foam  

N/A
N/A
Show Text 

Spring Layer Bounciness 
 

Comfort Spring Layer Bounciness Video  

Support Spring Layer Bounciness Video  

Comfort Spring Layer Maximum Rebound Height 
 

N/A
N/A

Support Spring Layer Maximum Rebound Height 
 

30.0 cm (11.8")
31.0 cm (12.2")
Show Text 

Check Price

Queen
Premier Rest Hybrid
SEE PRICE
DreamCloud
Queen
Mattress
SEE PRICE
Boring

DreamCloud Premier Rest Hybrid

Boring Mattress

Comments

  1. Comparison

DreamCloud Premier Rest Hybrid vs Boring Mattress: Main Discussion

What do you think of these products? Let us know below.


Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Insiders have direct access to buying advice on our insider forum.

PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
No comments yet, refresh to see new ones