Mattress
Products
In The Lab
Forums
Newsletters
Join now
Best
Mattresses Side Sleepers Back Pain Memory Foam Brands King Size Firm Heavy People Hybrid Mattresses-In-A-Box Affordable Queen Cooling Organic Twin Latex Full-Size Medium Firm California King Twin XL
Tools
Compare Results Table Tool Review List Review Index Graph Review Pipeline Vote Custom Ratings
Popular
Casper Snow Helix Midnight Luxe 2025 Kirkland Stearns & Foster Pillow Top Lakeridge Casper Cooling Select Novaform Legacy Avocado Green Saatva Classic (Luxury Firm) Allswell Hybrid Saatva Latex Hybrid Sealy Posturepedic Pro Highland Manor Tempur-Pedic TEMPUR-Adapt Novaform ComfortGrande Plus Sleep On Latex Hybrid Brooklyn Bedding Signature Hybrid Helix Midnight Elite Saatva Classic (Plush Soft) Beautyrest Mattress Beautyrest Black Silk & Snow Mattress Stearns & Foster Lux Estate
70 Mattresses bought and tested
Supported by you via membership, and when you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.
  1. Home
  2. Mattress
  3. Compare

SweetNight CoolNest vs CoolNest Pro

Which Mattress Is Better?

    Top
    Main Differences
    Design
      Style
    Performance
      FirmnessBody ConformitySupportBouncinessComfort Layers EnvelopmentResponsivenessMotion IsolationEdge SupportCooling
    Components
      CoverEdge ConstructionFoam Layer MaterialFoam Layer Mass DensityFoam Layer ThicknessSpring Layer DimensionsFoam Layer FirmnessSpring Layer FirmnessFoam Layer ResilienceSpring Layer Bounciness
    Comments

Products

SweetNight CoolNest
SweetNight CoolNest Pro

Tested using Methodology v1.2

Updated Sep 03, 2026 12:09 PM

SEE PRICE
Amazon

Tested using Methodology v1.2

Updated Sep 17, 2026 04:12 PM

SEE PRICE
Amazon
SweetNight CoolNest Picture

Track

SweetNight CoolNest Pro Picture

Track

Mattress Type
Foam
Bed-In-A-Box
Yes
Upper Comfort Foam @ LumbarMemory Foam
Firmness Level
Medium-Plush (39 Pa/mm)
Mattress Type
Foam
Bed-In-A-Box
Yes
Upper Comfort Foam @ LumbarMemory Foam
Firmness Level
Medium-Plush (40 Pa/mm)
  1. Recommended in 1 article:
  2. Cooling

Our Verdict

SweetNight CoolNest

SweetNight CoolNest Pro

The SweetNight CoolNest Pro is a bit better than the SweetNight CoolNest for most people. It offers better support, cooling, and motion isolation, and it's slightly more durable. However, the basic CoolNest offers better pressure relief for lighter side sleepers. 

GIFT THIS COMPARISON

0 

Variants

  • CoolNest (14") (California King)
  • CoolNest (14") (Full)
  • CoolNest Pro (14") (King)
  • CoolNest Pro (14") (Queen)

Review

See SweetNight CoolNest Review
See SweetNight CoolNest Pro Review
0 
0 

Check Price

California King
CoolNest (14")
SEE PRICE
Amazon
 
Full
CoolNest (14")
SEE PRICE
Amazon
 
King
CoolNest (14")
SEE PRICE
Amazon
King
CoolNest Pro (14")
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Queen
CoolNest (14")
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Queen
CoolNest Pro (14")
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Twin
CoolNest (14")
SEE PRICE
SweetNight
 

Main Differences for
Side Sleeping

Threshold 

0.10

Side Sleeping 
 

8.0
7.7
No major differences between these mattresses for side sleeping. See full list of tests below.

Full Comparison

Design

Style 
 

Style Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
SweetNight CoolNest Style Picture
Compare High-Res
SweetNight CoolNest Pro Style Picture

Mattress Type 
 

Foam
Foam

Bed-In-A-Box 
 

Yes
Yes

Quilted Top Layer 
 

No
No

Grab Handles 
 

No
No

Thickness  

34.5 cm (13.6")
34.2 cm (13.5")
Performance

Firmness 
 

Head/Feet Firmness  

 Preview Graph
SweetNight CoolNest Head/Feet Firmness
 Preview Graph
SweetNight CoolNest Pro Head/Feet Firmness
 Compare in Graph Tool

Lumbar Firmness  

 Preview Graph
SweetNight CoolNest Lumbar Firmness
 Preview Graph
SweetNight CoolNest Pro Lumbar Firmness
 Compare in Graph Tool

Firmness Video  

Normalized Stiffness @ Head/Feet 
 

39 Pa/mm
38 Pa/mm

Normalized Stiffness @ Lumbar 
 

39 Pa/mm
40 Pa/mm

Firmness Level 
 

Medium-Plush (39 Pa/mm)
Medium-Plush (40 Pa/mm)

Body Conformity 
 

8.2
7.8

Shoulder Indentation vs. Body Weight  

 Preview Graph
SweetNight CoolNest Shoulder Indentation vs. Body Weight
 Preview Graph
SweetNight CoolNest Pro Shoulder Indentation vs. Body Weight
 Compare in Graph Tool

Body Conformity Picture 1  

SweetNight CoolNest Body Conformity Picture 1

Body Conformity Picture 2  

SweetNight CoolNest Body Conformity Picture 2

Indent @ 50 kg (110 lb) 
 

52 mm (2.0")
47 mm (1.8")

Indent @ 80 kg (176 lb) 
 

79 mm (3.1")
74 mm (2.9")

Indent @ 110 kg (242 lb) 
 

113 mm (4.4")
101 mm (4.0")

Support 
 

6.0
6.7

Pelvis Indentation vs. Body Weight  

 Preview Graph
SweetNight CoolNest Pelvis Indentation vs. Body Weight
 Preview Graph
SweetNight CoolNest Pro Pelvis Indentation vs. Body Weight
 Compare in Graph Tool

Indent Difference @ 50 kg (110 lb) 
 

24 mm (0.9")
19 mm (0.7")

Indent Difference @ 80 kg (176 lb) 
 

28 mm (1.1")
23 mm (0.9")

Indent Difference @ 110 kg (242 lb) 
 

39 mm (1.5")
30 mm (1.2")

Bounciness 
 

6.3
6.7

Bounciness Video  

Maximum Rebound Height 
 

9.0 cm (3.5")
11.0 cm (4.3")

Comfort Layers Envelopment 
 

8.4
7.7

Sinking & Contouring Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
SweetNight CoolNest Sinking & Contouring Picture
Compare High-Res
SweetNight CoolNest Pro Sinking & Contouring Picture

Sinking Depth 
 

5.0 cm (2.0")
4.8 cm (1.9")

Diameter Of Distortion 
 

24.9 cm (9.8")
26.9 cm (10.6")

Responsiveness 
 

8.8
9.0

Responsiveness Video  

Response Time 
 

0.6 s
0.6 s

Motion Isolation 
 

8.2
8.7

Motion Isolation Video  

Head/Feet Motion Isolation  

 Preview Graph
SweetNight CoolNest Head/Feet Motion Isolation
 Preview Graph
SweetNight CoolNest Pro Head/Feet Motion Isolation
 Compare in Graph Tool

Lumbar Motion Isolation  

 Preview Graph
SweetNight CoolNest Lumbar Motion Isolation
 Preview Graph
SweetNight CoolNest Pro Lumbar Motion Isolation
 Compare in Graph Tool

Peak Acceleration @ Head/Feet 
 

0.35 g
0.47 g

Dissipation Time @ Head/Feet 
 

0.36 s
0.33 s

Peak Acceleration @ Lumbar 
 

3.80 g
2.57 g

Dissipation Time @ Lumbar 
 

0.33 s
0.34 s

Edge Support 
 

5.7
5.1

Naturalistic Loading Pad Video  

Naturalistic Loading Pad  

 Preview Graph
SweetNight CoolNest Naturalistic Loading Pad
 Preview Graph
SweetNight CoolNest Pro Naturalistic Loading Pad
 Compare in Graph Tool

Small Platen  

 Preview Graph
SweetNight CoolNest Small Platen
 Preview Graph
SweetNight CoolNest Pro Small Platen
 Compare in Graph Tool

Naturalistic Loading Pad Indentation 
 

186 mm
182 mm

Small Platen Indentation @ 0 mm From Edge 
 

205 mm
201 mm

Small Platen Indentation @ 150 mm From Edge 
 

172 mm
155 mm

Increased Indentation @ Mattress Edge 
 

32 mm
46 mm

Cooling 
 

8.4
8.7

Cooling Graph  

 Preview Graph
SweetNight CoolNest Cooling Graph
 Preview Graph
SweetNight CoolNest Pro Cooling Graph
 Compare in Graph Tool

Energy Transferred Over 1st Hour 
 

68 kJ
73 kJ

Energy Transferred Over 8 Hours 
 

177 kJ
186 kJ
Components

Cover 
 

Cover Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
SweetNight CoolNest Cover Picture
Compare High-Res
SweetNight CoolNest Pro Cover Picture

Sleeping Surface Material 
 

Polyester
Polyester

Removable 
 

Yes
Yes

Machine Washable 
 

No
No

Edge Construction 
 

Edge Support Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
SweetNight CoolNest Edge Support Picture
Compare High-Res
SweetNight CoolNest Pro Edge Support Picture

Edge Component 
 

None
None

Foam Layer Material 
 

Foam Layer Material Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
SweetNight CoolNest Foam Layer Material Picture
Compare High-Res
SweetNight CoolNest Pro Foam Layer Material Picture

Quilted Top Fill  

N/A
N/A

Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

Memory Foam
Memory Foam

Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

Memory Foam
Memory Foam

Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

Memory Foam
Memory Foam

Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

Memory Foam
Memory Foam

Transition Foam  

Polyfoam
Polyfoam

Support Foam  

Polyfoam
Polyfoam

Foam Layer Mass Density 
 

5.5
6.1

Quilted Top Fill  

N/A
N/A

Quilted Top Fill Foam Density vs. Reference 
 

N/A
N/A

Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

51 kg/m³ (3.2 lb/cu.ft.)
52 kg/m³ (3.2 lb/cu.ft.)

Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet Density vs. Reference 
 

0.8
0.8

Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

51 kg/m³ (3.2 lb/cu.ft.)
52 kg/m³ (3.2 lb/cu.ft.)

Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar Density vs. Reference 
 

0.8
0.8

Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

27 kg/m³ (1.7 lb/cu.ft.)
32 kg/m³ (2.0 lb/cu.ft.)

Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet Density vs. Reference 
 

0.4
0.5

Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

27 kg/m³ (1.7 lb/cu.ft.)
32 kg/m³ (2.0 lb/cu.ft.)

Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar Density vs. Reference 
 

0.4
0.5

Transition Foam  

27 kg/m³ (1.7 lb/cu.ft.)
29 kg/m³ (1.8 lb/cu.ft.)

Transition Foam Density vs. Reference 
 

0.8
0.9

Support Foam  

24 kg/m³ (1.5 lb/cu.ft.)
28 kg/m³ (1.7 lb/cu.ft.)

Support Foam Density vs Reference 
 

0.6
0.8

Foam Layer Thickness 
 

Foam Layer Thickness Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
SweetNight CoolNest Foam Layer Thickness Picture
Compare High-Res
SweetNight CoolNest Pro Foam Layer Thickness Picture

Quilted Top 
 

N/A
N/A

Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

2.5 cm (1.0")
2.5 cm (1.0")

Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

2.5 cm (1.0")
2.5 cm (1.0")

Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

5.0 cm (2.0")
5.0 cm (2.0")

Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

5.0 cm (2.0")
5.0 cm (2.0")

Transition Foam  

14.5 cm (5.7")
9.5 cm (3.7")

Support Foam  

12.5 cm (4.9")
10.5 cm (4.1")

Spring Layer Dimensions 
 

Spring Layer Height Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
SweetNight CoolNest Spring Layer Height Picture
Compare High-Res
SweetNight CoolNest Pro Spring Layer Height Picture

Spring Layer Density Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
SweetNight CoolNest Spring Layer Density Picture
Compare High-Res
SweetNight CoolNest Pro Spring Layer Density Picture

Comfort Layer Height 
 

N/A
N/A

Comfort Layer Coil Density 
 

N/A

Comfort Layer Coil Gauge 
 

N/A
N/A

Support Layer Height 
 

N/A
N/A

Support Layer Coil Density 
 

N/A

Support Layer Coil Gauge @ Head/Feet 
 

N/A
N/A

Support Layer Coil Gauge @ Lumbar 
 

N/A
N/A

Foam Layer Firmness 
 

Comfort Layer IPD  

 Preview Graph
SweetNight CoolNest Pro Comfort Layer IPD
 Compare in Graph Tool

Transition & Support Layer IPD  

 Preview Graph
SweetNight CoolNest Pro Transition & Support Layer IPD
 Compare in Graph Tool

Quilted Top Fill 25% IPD 
 

N/A

Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet 25% IPD 
 

1.7 kPa

Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar 25% IPD 
 

1.7 kPa

Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet 25% IPD 
 

1.7 kPa

Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar 25% IPD 
 

1.7 kPa

Transition Foam 25% IPD 
 

2.6 kPa

Support Foam 25% IPD 
 

3.3 kPa

Spring Layer Firmness 
 

Comfort Layer Firmness  

SweetNight CoolNest Pro Comfort Layer Firmness
 Compare in Graph Tool

Support Layer Firmness  

SweetNight CoolNest Pro Support Layer Firmness
 Compare in Graph Tool

Spring Layer Firmness  

Normalized Comfort Layer Stiffness @ Head/Feet 
 

N/A

Normalized Comfort Layer Stiffness @ Lumbar 
 

N/A

Normalized Support Layer Stiffness @ Head/Feet 
 

N/A

Normalized Support Layer Stiffness @ Lumbar 
 

N/A

Foam Layer Resilience 
 

Foam Layer Resilience Video  

Quilted Top Fill  

N/A
N/A

Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

16%
20%

Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

16%
20%

Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

4%
4%

Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

4%
4%

Transition Foam  

43%
49%

Support Foam  

46%
39%

Spring Layer Bounciness 
 

Comfort Spring Layer Bounciness Video  

Support Spring Layer Bounciness Video  

Comfort Spring Layer Maximum Rebound Height 
 

N/A

Support Spring Layer Maximum Rebound Height 
 

N/A

Check Price

California King
CoolNest (14")
SEE PRICE
Amazon
 
Full
CoolNest (14")
SEE PRICE
Amazon
 
King
CoolNest (14")
SEE PRICE
Amazon
King
CoolNest Pro (14")
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Queen
CoolNest (14")
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Queen
CoolNest Pro (14")
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Twin
CoolNest (14")
SEE PRICE
SweetNight
 
Back to Top

SweetNight CoolNest

SweetNight CoolNest Pro

Comments

  1. Comparison
 • Posted 16 days ago

SweetNight CoolNest vs SweetNight CoolNest Pro: Main Discussion

What do you think of these products? Let us know below.


Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.

See All Home Discussions
 Share
0 
PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
No comments yet, refresh to see new ones
We make money directly from you via Membership (which gives you access to extra features), when you buy RTINGS.com Merch, and when you buy a product after clicking a link to a retailer. Learn more about how we work.
We buy our own products, just like you, mostly from the United States. When a product is discontinued or no longer popular, we sell the review units locally. See what products we currently have for sale.
© 2026 9298-5266 Quebec Inc. All Rights Reserved.