Products
Tested using Methodology v0.12
Updated Jun 25, 2026 11:14 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Tested using Methodology v0.12
Updated Jul 24, 2026 04:51 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Heel Stack Height
41.7 mm
Weight
300.2 g (10.59 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
9.1 mm
Plate
None
Heel Stack Height
36.0 mm
Weight
266.6 g (9.40 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
9.2 mm
Plate
None
Our Verdict
ASICS GEL-KAYANO 32
ASICS GT-1000 15
The ASICS GT-1000 15 and ASICS GEL-KAYANO 32 are both support trainers from the same brand, but they sit on different rungs of the ladder. The GEL-KAYANO 32 is the more premium option, using ASICS' 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM to provide much more stability and pairing it with an FF BLAST+ ECO midsole to offer more protection overall. It is, however, much heavier and retails for considerably more, and runners who don't need all the bells and whistles will still find the GT-1000 15 an impressively stable shoe overall.
Variants
- GEL-KAYANO 32 (Black/Dark Currant - (Women - US 7))
- GEL-KAYANO 32 (Black/Graphite Grey - (Men - US 9))
- GT-1000 15 (Black/Black - (Men - US 9))
- GT-1000 15 (Black/Black - (Women - US 7))
Main Differences for
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Threshold
Half/Full Marathon Racing
6.0
5.1
Forefoot Stack Height
32.6 mm
26.8 mm
Weight
4.4
5.8
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
6.9
4.5
Heel Stack Height
41.7 mm
36.0 mm
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
7.7
4.8
Full Comparison
Design
Weight
4.4
5.8
Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Weight
300.2 g (10.59 oz)
266.6 g (9.40 oz)
Stack Heights
Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Stack Height
41.7 mm
36.0 mm
Forefoot Stack Height
32.6 mm
26.8 mm
Heel-To-Toe Drop
9.1 mm
9.2 mm
Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
8.0 mm
8.0 mm
External Shape
3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Outsole Heel Width
94 mm (3.7")
89 mm (3.5")
Outsole Arch Width
78 mm (3.1")
71 mm (2.8")
Outsole Forefoot Width
118 mm (4.6")
110 mm (4.3")
Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
2.25
2.47
Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
3.62
4.10
Internal Shape
3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Internal Length
280 mm (11.0")
282 mm (11.1")
Internal Heel Width
68 mm (2.7")
65 mm (2.6")
Internal Forefoot Width
97 mm (3.8")
95 mm (3.7")
Wide Sizing Available
Yes
Yes
Forefoot Fit: Width
9.2
9.2
Forefoot Width Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation
3.4 mm (0.133")
2.9 mm (0.115")
Toe TTS Deviation
3.4 mm (0.135")
-2.1 mm (-0.081")
Forefoot Fit: Height
6.8
4.2
Forefoot Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe TTS Deviation
-3.8 mm (-0.150")
-6.8 mm (-0.268")
Arch Fit: Width
9.9
9.4
Arch Fit Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Arch Width TTS Deviation
1.6 mm (0.062")
4.3 mm (0.170")
Length Fit
10
10
Toe Clearance Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Rocker Geometry
5.1
6.6
Heel Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Spring
13 mm (0.5")
17 mm (0.7")
Heel Apex Position
13.4%
18.6%
Heel Rocker Angle
18.0°
17.2°
Forefoot Rocker Geometry
6.8
6.5
Forefoot Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe Spring
47 mm (1.9")
45 mm (1.8")
Toe Apex Position
64.8%
66.1%
Forefoot Rocker Angle
24.1°
24.2°
Other Features
Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Tongue Gusset Type
Fully-gusseted
Non-gusseted
Plate
None
None
Performance
Heel Compression Energy Return
1.2
1.9
Heel Compression Video
Heel Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Heel Energy Return
65.5%
67.6%
Forefoot Compression Energy Return
1.6
1.7
Forefoot Compression Video
Forefoot Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Energy Return
67.0%
67.1%
Heel Cushioning
7.3
5.1
Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 550N
2.98 J
2.61 J
Energy Absorbed At 1100N
8.96 J
6.76 J
Energy Absorbed At 1900N
16.53 J
11.52 J
Forefoot Cushioning
7.4
4.9
Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 800N
4.29 J
3.15 J
Energy Absorbed At 1300N
7.86 J
5.31 J
Energy Absorbed At 2050N
11.92 J
7.74 J
Heel Firmness
8.6
9.4
Heel Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 550N
51.4 N/mm
59.3 N/mm
Firmness At 1100N
60.4 N/mm
75.7 N/mm
Firmness At 1900N
81.1 N/mm
106.6 N/mm
Forefoot Firmness
9.0
10
Forefoot Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 800N
67.5 N/mm
93.5 N/mm
Firmness At 1300N
84.7 N/mm
121.7 N/mm
Firmness At 2050N
115 N/mm
168 N/mm
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
6.9
4.5
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 10km
7.53 J
4.96 J
Energy Absorbed At 20km
7.35 J
4.87 J
Energy Absorbed At 30km
7.25 J
4.83 J
Energy Absorbed At 40km
7.18 J
4.78 J
Rocker Stiffness
5.9
6.1
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Video
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Force To Flatten The Rocker
58 N
63 N
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
3.9
3.7
Forefoot Bending Video
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
53.0%
52.3%
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
7.7
4.8
Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Bending Resistance
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
13.5 N/mm
5.3 N/mm
Forefoot Bending Force
360 N
197 N
To access
Become a member
unlimited full product reviews,
product prices, and
other exclusive site features
ASICS GEL-KAYANO 32
ASICS GT-1000 15
Comments
ASICS GEL-KAYANO 32 vs ASICS GT-1000 15: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.