ASICS METASPEED SKY PARIS vs PUMA Fast-R NITRO Elite 3

Which Running Shoe Is Better?

Products

ASICS METASPEED SKY PARIS
PUMA Fast-R NITRO Elite 3

Tested using Methodology v0.8.2

Updated Oct 24, 2025 01:45 PM

SEE PRICE
Asics.com

Tested using Methodology v0.9

Updated Oct 30, 2025 08:35 PM

SEE PRICE
PUMA
  1. Recommended in 1 article:
  2. Long Distance

Our Verdict

ASICS METASPEED SKY PARIS

PUMA Fast-R NITRO Elite 3

The ASICS METASPEED SKY PARIS and the PUMA Fast-R NITRO Elite 3 are two elite racing shoes built for speed, but they take very different approaches. Both are lightweight and designed for high performance, but the PUMA is more aggressive overall, featuring a split midsole and pronounced rocker that creates a propulsive ride, which is especially effective for midfoot and forefoot strikers. The ASICS, in contrast, has a firmer forefoot at average forces, delivering a snappy toe-off that excels in shorter efforts and controlled pacing, but with a more traditional and smoother transition. The ASICS feels more precise and stable, particularly over shorter distances where ground contact and control matter more.

0 

Variants

  • METASPEED SKY PARIS (Illuminate Mint/Black - (Men - US 9))
  • METASPEED SKY PARIS (Illuminate Mint/Black - (Women - US 7))
  • METASPEED SKY PARIS (Light Blue/Black - (Men - US 9))
  • METASPEED SKY PARIS (Light Blue/Black - (Women - US 7))
  • METASPEED SKY PARIS (Safety Yellow/Black - (Men - US 9))
  • METASPEED SKY PARIS (Safety Yellow/Black - (Women - US 7))
  • METASPEED SKY PARIS (Sunrise Red/Black - (Men - US 9))
  • METASPEED SKY PARIS (Sunrise Red/Black - (Women - US 7))
  • Fast-R NITRO Elite 3 (Mint Melt/Speed Blue - (Men - US 9))
  • Fast-R NITRO Elite 3 (Mint Melt/Speed Blue - (Women - US 7))
  • Fast-R NITRO Elite 3 (White/Glowing Red/Mint Melt - (Men - US 9))
  • Fast-R NITRO Elite 3 (White/Glowing Red/Mint Melt - (Women - US 7))
Read more

Main Differences for
Marathon Racing

Threshold 

0.10

Marathon Racing 

8.5
8.7

Heel Energy Return 
 

7.8
8.8

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

8.5
8.9

Full Comparison

Design

Weight  

8.8
8.9

Right Shoe Weight Photo  

Left Shoe Weight Photo  

Weight 
 

176.6 g (6.23 oz)
173.3 g (6.11 oz)
Show Text 

Stack Heights 
 

Stack Height Photo  

Heel Stack Height 
 

39.2 mm
39.3 mm

Forefoot Stack Height 
 

34.4 mm
30.4 mm

Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

4.8 mm
8.9 mm

Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

5.0 mm
8.0 mm

External Shape 
 

3D Model Full Shoe  

Outsole Heel Width 
 

74 mm (2.9")
82 mm (3.2")

Outsole Arch Width 
 

56 mm (2.2")
25 mm (1.0")

Outsole Forefoot Width 
 

101 mm (4.0")
113 mm (4.4")

Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

1.89
2.09

Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

2.94
3.72

Internal Shape 
 

3D Model Internal  

Internal Length 
 

260 mm (10.2")
273 mm (10.7")

Internal Heel Width 
 

49 mm (1.9")
60 mm (2.4")

Internal Forefoot Width 
 

83 mm (3.3")
93 mm (3.7")

Wide Sizing Available 
 

No
No
Show Text 

Other Features  

Other Features Photo  

Tongue Gusset Type 
 

Non-gusseted
Non-gusseted

Plate 
 

Carbon Fiber
Carbon Fiber
Show Text 
Performance

Heel Energy Return 
 

7.8
8.8

Heel Compression Video  

Heel Energy Return  

See details
See details

Heel Energy Return 
 

79.7%
86.1%
Show Text 

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

8.5
8.9

Forefoot Compression Video  

Forefoot Energy Return  

See details
See details

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

84.0%
86.7%
Show Text 

Heel Cushioning 
 

7.5
8.1

Heel Cushioning Picture  

Heel Cushioning  

See details
See details

Energy Absorbed At 550N 
 

3.30 J
4.30 J

Energy Absorbed At 1100N 
 

9.30 J
9.78 J

Energy Absorbed At 1900N 
 

15.81 J
15.43 J
Show Text 

Forefoot Cushioning 
 

8.0
8.7

Forefoot Cushioning Picture  

Forefoot Cushioning  

See details
See details

Energy Absorbed At 800N 
 

4.69 J
5.56 J

Energy Absorbed At 1300N 
 

8.45 J
9.67 J

Energy Absorbed At 2050N 
 

13.22 J
14.13 J
Show Text 

Heel Firmness 
 

5.6
5.8

Heel Firmness  

See details
See details

Firmness At 550N 
 

51.2 N/mm
47.1 N/mm

Firmness At 1100N 
 

112.8 N/mm
130.6 N/mm

Firmness At 1900N 
 

247.5 N/mm
295.0 N/mm
Show Text 

Forefoot Firmness 
 

7.3
7.4

Forefoot Firmness  

See details
See details

Firmness At 800N 
 

101.4 N/mm
88.5 N/mm

Firmness At 1300N 
 

179.9 N/mm
177.7 N/mm

Firmness At 2050N 
 

332.0 N/mm
394.7 N/mm
Show Text 

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning 
 

8.0

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning  

See details

Energy Absorbed At 10km 
 

8.81 J

Energy Absorbed At 20km 
 

8.60 J

Energy Absorbed At 30km 
 

8.47 J

Energy Absorbed At 40km 
 

8.39 J

ASICS METASPEED SKY PARIS

PUMA Fast-R NITRO Elite 3

Comments

  1. Comparison

ASICS METASPEED SKY PARIS vs PUMA Fast-R NITRO Elite 3: Main Discussion

What do you think of these products? Let us know below.


Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Insiders have direct access to buying advice on our insider forum.

PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
No comments yet, refresh to see new ones