Products
Tested using Methodology v0.14
Updated Oct 29, 2026 06:28 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Tested using Methodology v0.12
Updated Aug 12, 2026 06:02 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Heel Stack Height
36.2 mm
Weight
282.3 g (9.96 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
10.9 mm
Plate
None
Heel Stack Height
28.5 mm
Weight
259.7 g (9.16 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
8.3 mm
Plate
None
Our Verdict
Brooks Ghost 17
Brooks Anthem 7
The Brooks Ghost 17 is a better daily trainer than the Brooks Anthem 7. Its significantly better cushioning absorbs more road impact, while its taller stack provides a greater buffer between your feet and the pavement. Both shoes are similarly stable, making them dependable options for regular use. However, the Anthem 7 is cheaper and has a lower stack, making it a better choice for runners who prefer plenty of ground feel or want an affordable shoe for occasional short runs and walking.
Variants
- Ghost 17 (Acid Lime/Navy/White - (Men - US 9))
- Ghost 17 (Apricot/Grey/Pink - (Women - US 7))
- Anthem 7 (Almond/Grey/Desert Flower - (Women - US 7))
- Anthem 7 (Antarctica/Harbor Mist/Skyway - (Women - US 7))
Main Differences for
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Threshold
Half/Full Marathon Racing
5.0
3.9
Heel Stack Height
36.2 mm
28.5 mm
Weight
5.1
6.0
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
4.9
2.9
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
4.3
2.2
Forefoot Compression Energy Return
2.5
0.7
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
6.7
4.0
Full Comparison
Design
Weight
5.1
6.0
Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Weight
282.3 g (9.96 oz)
259.7 g (9.16 oz)
Stack Heights
Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Stack Height
36.2 mm
28.5 mm
Forefoot Stack Height
25.3 mm
20.2 mm
Heel-To-Toe Drop
10.9 mm
8.3 mm
Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
10.0 mm
10.0 mm
External Shape
3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Outsole Heel Width
91 mm (3.6")
88 mm (3.5")
Outsole Arch Width
75 mm (3.0")
69 mm (2.7")
Outsole Forefoot Width
112 mm (4.4")
112 mm (4.4")
Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
2.51
3.09
Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
4.43
5.54
Internal Shape
3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Internal Length
279 mm (11.0")
277 mm (10.9")
Internal Heel Width
67 mm (2.6")
64 mm (2.5")
Internal Forefoot Width
91 mm (3.6")
94 mm (3.7")
Wide Sizing Available
Yes
Yes
Forefoot Fit: Width
9.9
9.6
Forefoot Width Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation
0.1 mm (0.004")
1.0 mm (0.039")
Toe TTS Deviation
-0.8 mm (-0.032")
-1.9 mm (-0.073")
Forefoot Fit: Height
7.7
4.9
Forefoot Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe TTS Deviation
-2.7 mm (-0.108")
-6.0 mm (-0.237")
Arch Fit: Width
6.1
9.0
Arch Fit Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Arch Width TTS Deviation
-5.7 mm (-0.224")
-1.8 mm (-0.072")
Length Fit
10
10
Toe Clearance Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Rocker Geometry
6.9
7.2
Heel Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Spring
18 mm (0.7")
19 mm (0.7")
Heel Apex Position
15.3%
17.1%
Heel Rocker Angle
21.8°
20.8°
Forefoot Rocker Geometry
5.7
5.5
Forefoot Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe Spring
40 mm (1.6")
40 mm (1.6")
Toe Apex Position
66.1%
69.3%
Forefoot Rocker Angle
21.8°
24.0°
Foam
Primary Foam Picture
Secondary Foam Picture
Primary Foam Name
DNA LOFT V3
Primary Foam Type
EVA
Secondary Foam Name
No Secondary Foam
Secondary Foam Type
No Secondary Foam
Laces
Laces Picture
Lace Type
Round
Width
5.0 mm (0.2")
Thickness
2.5 mm (0.1")
Stretch
15.0%
Other Features
Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Tongue Gusset Type
Non-gusseted
Non-gusseted
Plate
None
None
Performance
Heel Compression Energy Return
1.5
0.6
Heel Compression Video
Heel Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Heel Energy Return
66.5%
61.5%
Forefoot Compression Energy Return
2.5
0.7
Forefoot Compression Video
Forefoot Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Energy Return
68.8%
62.1%
Heel Cushioning
7.0
4.6
Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 550N
2.79 J
2.09 J
Energy Absorbed At 1100N
8.76 J
6.43 J
Energy Absorbed At 1900N
16.23 J
11.74 J
Forefoot Cushioning
5.4
3.2
Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 800N
3.32 J
2.16 J
Energy Absorbed At 1300N
5.84 J
3.77 J
Energy Absorbed At 2050N
8.94 J
5.76 J
Heel Firmness
8.9
9.7
Heel Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 550N
56.6 N/mm
77.4 N/mm
Firmness At 1100N
64.0 N/mm
87.7 N/mm
Firmness At 1900N
85.0 N/mm
117.1 N/mm
Forefoot Firmness
9.7
10
Forefoot Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 800N
85.3 N/mm
138.6 N/mm
Firmness At 1300N
109.8 N/mm
176.9 N/mm
Firmness At 2050N
149 N/mm
239 N/mm
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
4.9
2.9
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 10km
5.41 J
3.50 J
Energy Absorbed At 20km
5.28 J
3.37 J
Energy Absorbed At 30km
5.23 J
3.31 J
Energy Absorbed At 40km
5.21 J
3.27 J
Rocker Stiffness
6.3
5.0
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Video
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Force To Flatten The Rocker
68 N
43 N
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
4.3
2.2
Forefoot Bending Video
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
54.3%
47.3%
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
6.7
4.0
Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Bending Resistance
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
7.1 N/mm
2.0 N/mm
Forefoot Bending Force
348 N
214 N
Become a member
$2.65/month, billed yearly
Brooks Ghost 17
Brooks Anthem 7
Comments
Brooks Ghost 17 vs Brooks Anthem 7: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.