Brooks Anthem 7  Review

Review updated Jul 02, 2026 at 11:14am
Writing modified Aug 12, 2026 at 02:05pm
Tested using Methodology v0.12 
Brooks Anthem 7

Track

3.9
Half/Full Marathon Racing 
5.9
5K/10K Racing 
5.0
Long Run 
6.6
Daily Training 

Track

 0
Notice: This running shoes was replaced by Brooks Anthem 8

The Brooks Anthem 7 is a no-frills daily trainer for runners who want a firm, low-stack shoe with plenty of ground feel. Its impressively stable platform makes the shoe very secure, but the thin, lifeless midsole offers very little impact protection or propulsion underfoot. It works well for walking, gym sessions, and short, easy runs, though longer efforts will leave your legs beat up.

✅ Buy If: ❌ Skip If:
  • You like a firm, low-stack ride with great stability.
  • You need one shoe for walking, gym work, and short runs.
  • You want a plush and protective daily trainer.
  • You prefer a lively ride with a lot of running range.

Our Verdict

3.9
Half/Full Marathon Racing 

The Brooks Anthem 7 is a bad choice for marathon racing. Its weight, combined with its lack of propulsion and midsole protection, means it does a poor job of protecting your legs over the distance.

Pros
Cons
  • Midsole provides awful long-run protection.

  • Ride lacks propulsion needed to turnover efficiently.

5.9
5K/10K Racing 

The Brooks Anthem 7 is an inadequate shoe for 5K/10K racing. Its firm forefoot is intended more for stability than pep, and its dull midsole plus its significant bulk make it a hard shoe to turn over at speed.

Pros
Cons
  • Dull midsole lacks responsiveness.

  • Too heavy to turn over quickly.

5.0
Long Run 

The Brooks Anthem 7 is a poor pick for long runs. Whilst it offers impressive stability, the midsole's poor protection becomes increasingly apparent as the miles build. Its lack of propulsion and weight also make it a hard shoe to turn over.

Pros
Cons
  • Midsole provides awful long-run protection.

  • Ride lacks propulsion needed to turnover efficiently.

6.6
Daily Training 

The Brooks Anthem 7 is an adequate daily trainer. Its impressive stability makes it a trustworthy companion underfoot, though its lack of cushioning and bounce means it's best suited to runners who want a firmer, more traditional ride.

Pros
  • Excellent stability provides a secure platform underfoot.

Cons
  • Firm ride lacks cushioning and bounce.

  • 3.9
    Half/Full Marathon Racing
  • 5.9
    5K/10K Racing
  • 5.0
    Long Run
  • 6.6
    Daily Training
  • Changelog

    1.  Updated Aug 12, 2026: 

      We've updated this review to add a link to the newly reviewed adidas Zenboost in the Forefoot Compression Energy Return box.

    2.  Updated Aug 05, 2026: 

      We've updated the Forefoot Firmness box to add a comparison to the newly reviewed adidas Runfalcon 6 CLOUDFOAM.

    3.  Updated Jul 23, 2026: 

      We've added a new table in the intro to help you quickly determine if this shoe matches your needs.

    4.  Updated Jul 02, 2026: 

      We've updated the article to add text across all boxes and side-by-sides after converting the shoe to Test Bench 0.12.

    How We Test Running Shoes
    How We Test Running Shoes

    We've bought and tested more than 250 running shoes. Every pair purchased with our own money, never supplied or sponsored by brands. Our data-driven tests are designed to go beyond marketing claims, and since every shoe goes through the exact same methodology, you can directly compare results to find the right pair for your needs. 

    Test Results

    perceptual testing image
    0.7

    Energy Return

    The Brooks Anthem 7 provides absolutely awful energy return. The shoe gives nothing back across both the forefoot and heel, making runners work very hard for the paces they want to sustain.

    Pros
    Cons
    • Forefoot and heel give little back under load.

    0.7
    Forefoot Compression Energy Return
    Forefoot Energy Return
    62.1%

    The forefoot energy return is also one of the worst we've tested. Like the heel, it provides a languid and unsympathetic ride that makes toe-off harsh and muted. If you're looking for a low-stack, speedy shoe that's got enough good old-fashioned groundfeel, check out the adidas Zenboost instead.

    0.6
    Heel Compression Energy Return
    Heel Energy Return
    61.5%

    The energy return in the heel is one of the worst we've ever tested. The DNA LOFT midsole delivers a dull experience, returning next to nothing as you strike.

    8.2

    Stability

    The Brooks Anthem 7 is an impressively stable shoe. Its firm heel, firm forefoot, and excellent heel width-to-stack ratio make it easy to trust underfoot, while the low stack keeps the ride planted despite the narrower outsole arch.

    Pros
    • Firm platform keeps strides planted.

    • Confidence inspiring underfoot.

    Cons
    External Shape
    Outsole Heel Width
    88 mm (3.5")
    Outsole Arch Width
    69 mm (2.7")
    Outsole Forefoot Width
    112 mm (4.4")
    Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
    3.09
    Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
    5.54
    9.7
    Heel Firmness
    Firmness At 550N
    77.4 N/mm
    Firmness At 1100N
    87.7 N/mm
    Firmness At 1900N
    117.1 N/mm

    The heel of the Brooks Anthem 7 is amongst the firmest we've ever tested. This contributes to its excellent stability, but also makes the ride harsh underfoot.

    10
    Forefoot Firmness
    Firmness At 800N
    138.6 N/mm
    Firmness At 1300N
    176.9 N/mm
    Firmness At 2050N
    239 N/mm

    The forefoot in this shoe also ranks as one of the firmest we've ever tested. It's very similar to other no-frills shoes like the adidas Runfalcon 6 CLOUDFOAM. It makes roll-through and toe-off remarkably trustworthy, though it also makes the midsole unforgiving of the road.

    Other Features
    Tongue Gusset Type
    Non-gusseted
    Plate
    None
    3.9

    Cushioning

    The Brooks Anthem 7 is a poorly cushioned shoe. Heel protection is bad, and the forefoot is even worse, leaving the ride harsh and unforgiving.

    Pros
    Cons
    • Forefoot protection is truly awful.

    • Ride is harsh overall.

    4.6
    Heel Cushioning
    Energy Absorbed At 550N
    2.09 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1100N
    6.43 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1900N
    11.74 J

    The cushioning in the heel is poor overall. The basic, EVA-blend midsole offers bad protection underfoot, resulting in a much harsher ride than shoes like the Brooks Ghost 18.

    3.2
    Forefoot Cushioning
    Energy Absorbed At 800N
    2.16 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1300N
    3.77 J
    Energy Absorbed At 2050N
    5.76 J

    The forefoot is significantly less cushioned than the heel, and performs terribly at higher force levels.

    3.1

    Responsiveness

    The Brooks Anthem 7 delivers poor responsiveness underfoot. The forefoot and heel give little back under load, which, combined with the compliant rocker and inability to store and return energy in the midsole, means the ride is lifeless.

    Pros
    Cons
    • Forefoot gives little back at toe-off.

    • Compliant rocker fails to add propulsion.

    2.2
    Forefoot Bending Energy Return
    Forefoot Bending Energy Return
    47.3%

    This shoe returns a truly terrible amount of stored energy when bent. Runners looking for a popping, efficient shoe should look elsewhere.

    4.0
    Forefoot Bending Stiffness
    Forefoot Bending Stiffness
    2.0 N/mm
    Forefoot Bending Force
    214 N

    The forefoot's lack of stiffness means it lacks the snap to provide efficiency. Though not a performance shoe like the On Cloudboom Strike, even daily trainers like the Nike Winflo 11 prove that price doesn't have to compromise performance.

    5.5
    Forefoot Rocker Geometry
    Toe Spring
    40 mm (1.6")
    Toe Apex Position
    69.3%
    Forefoot Rocker Angle
    24.0°

    The unassertive rocker does little to help the foot roll through toe-off, contributing to the lack of propulsion in the ride.

    5.0
    Rocker Stiffness
    Force To Flatten The Rocker
    43 N

    The rocker is on the compliant side of all the shoes we've tested, losing its shape under load and preventing a fluid roll over.

    9.4

    True To Size

    The Brooks Anthem 7 fits true to size. The length is spot on, while the forefoot and arch provide plenty of room. The only caveat is the shallow toe box, which may feel restrictive for runners with particularly tall toes.

    Pros
    • Roomy forefoot accommodates most feet.

    Cons
    • Low toe box may restrict taller toes.

    10
    Length Fit
    9.6
    Forefoot Fit: Width
    Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation
    1.0 mm (0.039")
    Toe TTS Deviation
    -1.9 mm (-0.073")
    9.0
    Arch Fit: Width
    Arch Width TTS Deviation
    -1.8 mm (-0.072")
    4.9
    Forefoot Fit: Height
    Toe TTS Deviation
    -6.0 mm (-0.237")

    The toebox is quite low and may prove an issue for runners with taller toes.

    Additional Tests
    6.0
    Design
    Weight
    Weight
    259.7 g (9.16 oz)
    Design
    Stack Heights
    Heel Stack Height
    28.5 mm
    Forefoot Stack Height
    20.2 mm
    Heel-To-Toe Drop
    8.3 mm
    Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
    10.0 mm

    Interestingly, we measured a lower heel-to-toe drop than advertised, though it's still within mid-drop range.

    Design
    Internal Shape
    Internal Length
    277 mm (10.9")
    Internal Heel Width
    64 mm (2.5")
    Internal Forefoot Width
    94 mm (3.7")
    Wide Sizing Available
    Yes
    7.2
    Design
    Heel Rocker Geometry
    Heel Spring
    19 mm (0.7")
    Heel Apex Position
    17.1%
    Heel Rocker Angle
    20.8°

    The heel rocker of the Brooks Anthem 7 is well-positioned to provide enough assistance to smooth transitions from rearfoot to forefoot.

    2.9
    Performance
    Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
    Energy Absorbed At 10km
    3.50 J
    Energy Absorbed At 20km
    3.37 J
    Energy Absorbed At 30km
    3.31 J
    Energy Absorbed At 40km
    3.27 J

    The midsole isn't engineered for long-distance running. It offers terrible protection from the first stride and only gets worse as the miles build.

    Popular Running Shoe Comparisons

    The Brooks Anthem 7 is an entry-level daily trainer that pushes back against the direction modern running shoes have taken. Its DNA LOFT midsole lacks the cushioning and rebound of newer foams, but that's entirely the point. Not everyone wants a towering, ultra-bouncy ride, and the Anthem 7 caters to runners who still prefer a firmer, closer-to-the-road feel. It occupies similar territory to the Saucony Kinvara 16, with both shoes prioritizing stability and ground feel over maximum cushioning, though the Brooks is the heavier and firmer of the two. It doesn't go as far as zero-drop options like the Altra Torin 8, instead striking a middle ground between zero-drop trainers and today's towering super stacks. For runners who miss what shoes once were, it presents very good value.

    Elsewhere in Brooks' lineup, the Brooks Glycerin 23 fills the premium daily trainer slot, while runners who need help with overpronation should look at the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25. The Brooks Hyperion 3 is the uptempo trainer, and the Brooks Glycerin Max 2 towers above the rest as the mile-soaking, max-cushion cruiser.

    For more from the brand, check out our picks for the best Brooks running shoes. First-time runners can start with our best beginner running shoes picks, while our best running shoes recommendations cover our top picks across categories.

    Brooks Revel 8

    Track

    The Brooks Anthem 7 and Brooks Revel 8 are both budget shoes from the same brand, though they have slightly different philosophies. The Revel 8 is the taller of the two, and though it uses the updated DNA Loft v2 midsole foam, it is outperformed by the Anthem 7 on everything from stability to responsiveness. That said, neither ride is lively; instead, they target runners looking for a traditional, no-frills feel underfoot, with the Anthem 7 best suited to runners who want a lower profile, and the Revel 8 those looking for a modern feel.

    Brooks Ghost 17

    Track

    The Brooks Anthem 7 and Brooks Ghost 17 are both Brooks daily trainers, but they target different runners. The Ghost is the classic daily trainer, offering runners more protection underfoot, with a heel-striker-centric geometry that makes it a reliable companion for those landing rearfoot first. The Anthem 7 is the entry-level shoe, using an old blueprint that is significantly less cushioned. Both shoes can handle daily training, though the Ghost is the more purpose-built shoe. That said, it costs more at retail too, but for those who don't want a low-stack underfoot, the performance upgrades are absolutely worth it.

    Brooks Trace 4

    Track

    The Brooks Trace 4 is a better running shoe than the Brooks Anthem 7. Though the Anthem 7 is a bit lighter and more stable, its lower profile is much less protective underfoot. The only world in which the Anthem 7 makes more sense for running is if you want a very low stack height by today's standards; otherwise, the Trace 4 is the better running shoe.

    Brooks Anthem 8

    Track

    The Brooks Anthem 8 is the successor to the Brooks Anthem 7 and brings with it some significant changes underfoot. Both shoes are equipped to handle a mix of running, walking, and gym work, though the Anthem 8 is the taller, higher-drop, much more cushioned shoe overall, and will suit those looking for a budget option with a modern trainer profile. The Anthem 7 is the lighter, lower shoe, geared towards those who prefer a more traditional, ground-feel-first ride.

    Differences Between Sizes And Variants

    We tested the Brooks Anthem 7 in men's US size 9, as indicated on the label of our pair. The color featured on the shoe we tested is Peacoat/Ribbon/Country Blue, but you can also get the shoe in other colors, depending on the region. This shoe is available in two widths: Medium and Wide. The design section applies only to the exact model we tested, but we expect other sizes and genders to perform similarly.