Products
Tested using Methodology v0.16
Updated Sep 23, 2026 02:28 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Tested using Methodology v0.15
Updated Sep 03, 2026 08:40 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Heel Stack Height
36.4 mm
Weight
239.2 g (8.44 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
8.4 mm
Plate
Plastic
Heel Stack Height
37.8 mm
Weight
212.9 g (7.51 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
7.5 mm
Plate
Carbon Fiber
Our Verdict
Saucony Endorphin Speed 5
ANTA C202 7
The ANTA C202 7 and the Saucony Endorphin Speed 5 are both super trainers with a similar drop, but they emphasize different aspects of performance. The ANTA is lighter and more cushioned, giving it a slightly more protective feel underfoot for longer sessions. The Saucony leans more toward energy return and forefoot snap, with a bouncier midsole and a broader platform, making it feel more stable overall. Also, the ANTA has a tighter arch, while the Saucony offers a more accommodating midfoot, making it the better choice if you have a wider arch.
Variants
- Endorphin Speed 5 (Aloe - (Women - US 7))
- Endorphin Speed 5 (Black/VO2 - (Men - US 9))
- C202 7 (Black/Silver - (Men - US 9))
- C202 7 (Black/Silver - (Women - US 7))
Main Differences for
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Threshold
Half/Full Marathon Racing
7.0
7.9
Weight
6.8
7.7
Forefoot Stack Height
28.0 mm
30.3 mm
Heel Stack Height
36.4 mm
37.8 mm
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
6.1
7.4
Rocker Stiffness
4.8
8.7
Full Comparison
Design
Weight
6.8
7.7
Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Weight
239.2 g (8.44 oz)
212.9 g (7.51 oz)
Stack Heights
Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Stack Height
36.4 mm
37.8 mm
Forefoot Stack Height
28.0 mm
30.3 mm
Heel-To-Toe Drop
8.4 mm
7.5 mm
Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
8.0 mm
8.0 mm
External Shape
3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Outsole Heel Width
93 mm (3.6")
84 mm (3.3")
Outsole Arch Width
66 mm (2.6")
64 mm (2.5")
Outsole Forefoot Width
116 mm (4.6")
108 mm (4.3")
Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
2.55
2.22
Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
4.14
3.56
Internal Shape
3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Internal Length
275 mm (10.8")
272 mm (10.7")
Internal Heel Width
61 mm (2.4")
64 mm (2.5")
Internal Forefoot Width
94 mm (3.7")
91 mm (3.6")
Wide Sizing Available
No
No
Forefoot Fit: Width
9.1
9.1
Forefoot Width Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation
0.7 mm (0.029")
4.1 mm (0.163")
Toe TTS Deviation
-3.4 mm (-0.135")
1.3 mm (0.049")
Forefoot Fit: Height
10
7.9
Forefoot Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe TTS Deviation
0.3 mm (0.013")
-2.6 mm (-0.100")
Arch Fit: Width
9.8
4.7
Arch Fit Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Arch Width TTS Deviation
2.4 mm (0.094")
-7.3 mm (-0.285")
Length Fit
10
7.0
Toe Clearance Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Rocker Geometry
8.0
8.1
Heel Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Spring
25 mm (1.0")
27 mm (1.1")
Heel Apex Position
19.0%
17.4%
Heel Rocker Angle
24.1°
28.4°
Forefoot Rocker Geometry
7.9
7.9
Forefoot Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe Spring
56 mm (2.2")
56 mm (2.2")
Toe Apex Position
64.3%
63.4%
Forefoot Rocker Angle
28.1°
28.1°
Foam
Primary Foam Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Secondary Foam Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Primary Foam Name
PWRRUN PB
Not Advertised
Primary Foam Type
PEBA
Unknown
Secondary Foam Name
No Secondary Foam
No Secondary Foam
Secondary Foam Type
No Secondary Foam
No Secondary Foam
Laces
Laces Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Lace Type
Flat
Flat
Width
6.0 mm (0.2")
4.0 mm (0.2")
Thickness
2.0 mm (0.1")
1.9 mm (0.1")
Stretch
15.0%
7.0%
Breathability
9.0
Breathability Video
Upper Breathability
Upper Microscope Photo
Time-To-Dry
8.0
Time-To-Dry Timelapse
Time-To-Dry Graph
Preview Graph
Time To 30% Dry
6.2 hrs
Time To 70% Dry
15.3 hrs
Time To Dry
21.7 hrs
Water Absorption
8.9
Dry Weight Photo
Wet Weight Photo
Water Absorbed
32.3%
Other Features
Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Tongue Gusset Type
Fully-gusseted
Non-gusseted
Plate
Plastic
Carbon Fiber
Performance
Heel Compression Energy Return
8.2
7.2
Heel Compression Video
Heel Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Heel Energy Return
82.1%
76.7%
Forefoot Compression Energy Return
8.3
7.6
Forefoot Compression Video
Forefoot Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Energy Return
82.6%
78.6%
Heel Cushioning
7.0
8.2
Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 550N
2.99 J
4.21 J
Energy Absorbed At 1100N
8.92 J
9.90 J
Energy Absorbed At 1900N
15.42 J
15.90 J
Forefoot Cushioning
6.7
7.9
Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 800N
4.18 J
4.94 J
Energy Absorbed At 1300N
7.19 J
8.46 J
Energy Absorbed At 2050N
10.48 J
12.50 J
Heel Firmness
8.7
6.7
Heel Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 550N
50.2 N/mm
36.3 N/mm
Firmness At 1100N
59.7 N/mm
49.0 N/mm
Firmness At 1900N
82.8 N/mm
71.4 N/mm
Forefoot Firmness
8.9
7.6
Forefoot Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 800N
63.8 N/mm
54.0 N/mm
Firmness At 1300N
83.9 N/mm
71.2 N/mm
Firmness At 2050N
117 N/mm
99 N/mm
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
6.1
7.4
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 10km
6.68 J
8.03 J
Energy Absorbed At 20km
6.55 J
7.89 J
Energy Absorbed At 30km
6.44 J
7.79 J
Energy Absorbed At 40km
6.37 J
7.71 J
Rocker Stiffness
4.8
8.7
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Video
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Force To Flatten The Rocker
40 N
151 N
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
7.7
7.3
Forefoot Bending Video
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
69.3%
66.6%
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
6.8
8.8
Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Bending Resistance
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
10.9 N/mm
29.3 N/mm
Forefoot Bending Force
259 N
392 N
Heel Compression Depth
5.3
6.7
Heel Compression Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Heel Compression At 550N
10.9 mm
15.2 mm
Heel Compression At 1100N
18.4 mm
22.5 mm
Heel Compression At 1900N
23.0 mm
26.6 mm
Forefoot Compression Depth
5.3
6.3
Forefoot Compression Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Compression At 800N
12.5 mm
14.8 mm
Forefoot Compression At 1300N
15.5 mm
18.2 mm
Forefoot Compression At 2050N
17.5 mm
20.7 mm
Saucony Endorphin Speed 5
ANTA C202 7
Comments
Saucony Endorphin Speed 5 vs ANTA C202 7: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.