Serta Perfect Sleeper Innerspring vs DreamCloud Premier Rest Hybrid

Which Mattress Is Better?

Products

Serta Perfect Sleeper Innerspring
DreamCloud Premier Rest Hybrid

Tested using Methodology v1.0.1

Updated Oct 03, 2025 06:12 PM

SEE PRICE
Serta

Tested using Methodology v1.0.1

Updated Oct 21, 2025 04:59 PM

SEE PRICE
DreamCloud

Our Verdict

Serta Perfect Sleeper Innerspring

DreamCloud Premier Rest Hybrid

The Serta Perfect Sleeper Innerspring and DreamCloud Premier Rest Hybrid are both medium-plush hybrids. While the Serta has better overall performance, both mattresses have their strengths, and you may prefer one over the other based on what matters to you. The Serta is more responsive and has better edge support, so it's easier to move around on. The DreamCloud offers better motion isolation, making it a good choice for light sleepers. It's also more cooling, and while the Serta still provides good cooling, only the DreamCloud offers sufficient cooling for hot sleepers.

0 

Variants

  • Perfect Sleeper Innerspring (Queen (Ultimate/Medium Pillow Top))
  • Premier Rest Hybrid (Queen)

Check Price

 
Queen
Premier Rest Hybrid
SEE PRICE
DreamCloud
Queen (Ultimate/Medium Pillow Top)
Perfect Sleeper Innerspring
SEE PRICE
Serta
 

Main Differences for
Sleeping (In Development)

Threshold 

0.10

Sleeping (In Development) 

8.0
7.4

Edge Support 
 

9.4
5.1

Cooling 
 

7.5
8.0

Motion Isolation 
 

6.6
8.5

Full Comparison

Design

Style 
 

Style Picture  

Mattress Type 
 

Hybrid
Hybrid

Bed-In-A-Box 
 

No
Yes

Quilted Top Layer 
 

Yes
Yes

Grab Handles 
 

Yes
Yes

Thickness  

36.5 cm (14.4")
35.7 cm (14.1")
Show Text 
Performance

Firmness 
 

Head/Feet Firmness  

See details
See details

Lumbar Firmness  

See details
See details

Firmness Video  

Normalized Stiffness @ Head/Feet 
 

37 Pa/mm
35 Pa/mm

Normalized Stiffness @ Lumbar 
 

40 Pa/mm
36 Pa/mm

Firmness Level 
 

Medium-Plush (40 Pa/mm)
Medium-Plush (36 Pa/mm)
Show Text 

Bounciness 
 

Bounciness Video  

Maximum Rebound Height 
 

14.0 cm (5.5")
7.5 cm (3.0")

Bounciness Level 
 

Moderate (14 cm)
Low (8 cm)
Show Text 

Sinking & Contouring 
 

Sinking & Contouring Picture  

Sinking Depth 
 

4.9 cm (1.9")
5.3 cm (2.1")

Diameter Of Distortion 
 

24.8 cm (9.8")
28.6 cm (11.2")

Sinking Level 
 

Moderate (5 cm)
Moderate (5 cm)

Contouring Level 
 

High (25 cm)
Low (29 cm)
Show Text 

Responsiveness 
 

9.3
7.7

Responsiveness Video  

Response Time 
 

0.4 s
1.0 s
Show Text 

Motion Isolation 
 

6.6
8.5

Motion Isolation Video  

Head/Feet Motion Isolation  

See details
See details

Lumbar Motion Isolation  

See details
See details

Peak Acceleration @ Head/Feet 
 

2.73 g
1.16 g

Dissipation Time @ Head/Feet 
 

0.41 s
0.44 s

Peak Acceleration @ Lumbar 
 

5.93 g
2.54 g

Dissipation Time @ Lumbar 
 

0.58 s
0.36 s
Show Text 

Edge Support 
 

9.4
5.1

Naturalistic Loading Pad Video  

Naturalistic Loading Pad  

See details
See details

Small Platen  

See details
See details

Naturalistic Loading Pad Indentation 
 

124 mm
186 mm

Small Platen Indentation @ 0 mm From Edge 
 

137 mm
208 mm

Small Platen Indentation @ 150 mm From Edge 
 

134 mm
164 mm

Increased Indentation @ Mattress Edge 
 

2 mm
43 mm
Show Text 

Cooling 
 

7.5
8.0

Cooling Graph  

See details
See details

Energy Transferred Over 1st Hour 
 

57 kJ
63 kJ

Energy Transferred Over 8 Hours 
 

157 kJ
173 kJ
Show Text 
Components

Cover 
 

Cover Picture  

Sleeping Surface Material 
 

Not Provided by Manufacturer
Polyester, Rayon

Removable 
 

No
No

Machine Washable 
 

No
No
Show Text 

Edge Construction 
 

Edge Support Picture  

Edge Component 
 

Polyfoam
Pocket Coils
Show Text 

Foam Layer Material 
 

Foam Layer Material Picture  

Quilted Top Fill  

Polyfoam + Fiber Fill
Memory Foam + Polyfoam + Fiber Fill

Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

Polyfoam
Memory Foam

Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

Polyfoam
Memory Foam

Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

Memory Foam
N/A

Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

Memory Foam
N/A

Transition Foam  

Polyfoam
Polyfoam

Support Foam  

N/A
N/A
Show Text 

Foam Layer Mass Density 
 

3.7
6.3

Quilted Top Fill  

20 kg/m³ (1.2 lb/cu.ft.)
43 kg/m³ (2.7 lb/cu.ft.)

Quilted Top Fill Foam Density vs. Reference 
 

0.4
0.7

Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

35 kg/m³ (2.2 lb/cu.ft.)
35 kg/m³ (2.2 lb/cu.ft.)

Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet Density vs. Reference 
 

1.3
0.5

Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

35 kg/m³ (2.2 lb/cu.ft.)
35 kg/m³ (2.2 lb/cu.ft.)

Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar Density vs. Reference 
 

1.3
0.5

Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

21 kg/m³ (1.3 lb/cu.ft.)
N/A

Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet Density vs. Reference 
 

0.3
N/A

Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

21 kg/m³ (1.3 lb/cu.ft.)
N/A

Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar Density vs. Reference 
 

0.3
N/A

Transition Foam  

19 kg/m³ (1.2 lb/cu.ft.)
30 kg/m³ (1.9 lb/cu.ft.)

Transition Foam Density vs. Reference 
 

0.3
1.0

Support Foam  

N/A
N/A

Support Foam Density vs Reference 
 

N/A
N/A
Show Text 

Foam Layer Thickness 
 

Foam Layer Thickness Picture  

Quilted Top 
 

4.4 cm (1.7")
4.5 cm (1.8")

Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

5.0 cm (2.0")
5.0 cm (2.0")

Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

5.0 cm (2.0")
5.0 cm (2.0")

Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

2.5 cm (1.0")
N/A

Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

2.5 cm (1.0")
N/A

Transition Foam  

2.2 cm (0.9")
5.0 cm (2.0")

Support Foam  

N/A
N/A
Show Text 

Spring Layer Dimensions 
 

Spring Layer Height Picture  

Spring Layer Density Picture  

Comfort Layer Height 
 

N/A
N/A

Comfort Layer Coil Density 
 

N/A
N/A

Comfort Layer Coil Gauge 
 

N/A
N/A

Support Layer Height 
 

20.5 cm (8.1")
20.5 cm (8.1")

Support Layer Coil Density 
 

277 coils/m² (26 coils/ft²)
256 coils/m² (24 coils/ft²)

Support Layer Coil Gauge @ Head/Feet 
 

15 gauge
15 gauge

Support Layer Coil Gauge @ Lumbar 
 

14 gauge
15 gauge
Show Text 

Foam Layer Firmness 
 

Comfort Layer IPD  

See details
See details

Transition & Support Layer IPD  

See details
See details

Quilted Top Fill 25% IPD 
 

1.8 kPa
2.3 kPa

Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet 25% IPD 
 

2.6 kPa
1.5 kPa

Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar 25% IPD 
 

2.6 kPa
1.5 kPa

Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet 25% IPD 
 

1.4 kPa
N/A

Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar 25% IPD 
 

1.4 kPa
N/A

Transition Foam 25% IPD 
 

4.1 kPa
2.6 kPa

Support Foam 25% IPD 
 

N/A
N/A
Show Text 

Spring Layer Firmness 
 

Comfort Layer Firmness  

Support Layer Firmness  

See details
See details

Spring Layer Firmness  

Normalized Comfort Layer Stiffness @ Head/Feet 
 

N/A
N/A

Normalized Comfort Layer Stiffness @ Lumbar 
 

N/A
N/A

Normalized Support Layer Stiffness @ Head/Feet 
 

37 Pa/mm
56 Pa/mm

Normalized Support Layer Stiffness @ Lumbar 
 

51 Pa/mm
53 Pa/mm
Show Text 

Foam Layer Resilience 
 

Foam Layer Resilience Video  

Quilted Top Fill  

41%
11%

Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

45%
8%

Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

45%
8%

Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

18%
N/A

Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

18%
N/A

Transition Foam  

38%
48%

Support Foam  

N/A
N/A
Show Text 

Spring Layer Bounciness 
 

Comfort Spring Layer Bounciness Video  

Support Spring Layer Bounciness Video  

Comfort Spring Layer Maximum Rebound Height 
 

N/A
N/A

Support Spring Layer Maximum Rebound Height 
 

53.0 cm (20.9")
30.0 cm (11.8")
Show Text 

Check Price

 
Queen
Premier Rest Hybrid
SEE PRICE
DreamCloud
Queen (Ultimate/Medium Pillow Top)
Perfect Sleeper Innerspring
SEE PRICE
Serta
 

Serta Perfect Sleeper Innerspring

DreamCloud Premier Rest Hybrid

Comments

  1. Comparison

Serta Perfect Sleeper Innerspring vs DreamCloud Premier Rest Hybrid: Main Discussion

What do you think of these products? Let us know below.


Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Insiders have direct access to buying advice on our insider forum.

PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
No comments yet, refresh to see new ones