Products
Tested using Methodology v1.2
Updated Sep 03, 2026 01:07 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Tested using Methodology v1.2
Updated Aug 24, 2026 07:07 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Mattress Type
Hybrid
Bed-In-A-Box
Yes
Upper Comfort Foam @ LumbarMemory Foam
Firmness Level
Medium-Firm (56 Pa/mm)
Mattress Type
Hybrid
Bed-In-A-Box
Yes
Upper Comfort Foam @ LumbarMemory Foam
Firmness Level
Plush (30 Pa/mm)
Our Verdict
Nectar Classic Hybrid
Nectar Luxe Hybrid
The Nectar Classic Hybrid and the Nectar Luxe Hybrid have different strengths. Choose the Classic if you sleep on your back or stomach, since it's the more supportive option between the two. It also isolates motion more effectively, making it a better choice for couples looking to sleep peacefully. Go for the Luxe if you need more pressure relief for side sleeping or if you tend to sleep hot, since it's a bit more cooling.
Variants
- Classic Hybrid (California King)
- Classic Hybrid (Full)
- Luxe Hybrid (California King)
- Luxe Hybrid (Full)
Check Price
California King
Classic Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Amazon
California King
Luxe Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Nectar
Full
Classic Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Full
Luxe Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Nectar
King
Classic Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Amazon
King
Luxe Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Queen
Classic Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Queen
Luxe Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Split King
Luxe Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Nectar
Twin
Classic Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Nectar
Twin
Luxe Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Twin XL
Classic Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Twin XL
Luxe Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Nectar
Main Differences for
Side Sleeping
Side Sleeping
Threshold
Side Sleeping
6.7
7.6
Full Comparison
Design
Style
Style Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Mattress Type
Hybrid
Hybrid
Bed-In-A-Box
Yes
Yes
Quilted Top Layer
No
No
Grab Handles
Yes
Yes
Thickness
30.8 cm (12.1")
35.1 cm (13.8")
Performance
Firmness
Head/Feet Firmness
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Lumbar Firmness
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness Video
Normalized Stiffness @ Head/Feet
58 Pa/mm
29 Pa/mm
Normalized Stiffness @ Lumbar
56 Pa/mm
30 Pa/mm
Firmness Level
Medium-Firm (56 Pa/mm)
Plush (30 Pa/mm)
Body Conformity
6.5
7.9
Shoulder Indentation vs. Body Weight
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Body Conformity Picture 1
Body Conformity Picture 2
Indent @ 50 kg (110 lb)
36 mm (1.4")
44 mm (1.7")
Indent @ 80 kg (176 lb)
55 mm (2.2")
82 mm (3.2")
Indent @ 110 kg (242 lb)
79 mm (3.1")
110 mm (4.3")
Support
7.1
6.0
Pelvis Indentation vs. Body Weight
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Indent Difference @ 50 kg (110 lb)
15 mm (0.6")
22 mm (0.9")
Indent Difference @ 80 kg (176 lb)
19 mm (0.8")
35 mm (1.4")
Indent Difference @ 110 kg (242 lb)
29 mm (1.1")
34 mm (1.3")
Bounciness
7.6
6.3
Bounciness Video
Maximum Rebound Height
16.5 cm (6.5")
9.0 cm (3.5")
Comfort Layers Envelopment
7.2
7.6
Sinking & Contouring Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Sinking Depth
4.3 cm (1.7")
4.4 cm (1.7")
Diameter Of Distortion
26.1 cm (10.3")
24.3 cm (9.6")
Responsiveness
7.3
7.9
Responsiveness Video
Response Time
1.2 s
0.9 s
Motion Isolation
8.6
8.3
Motion Isolation Video
Head/Feet Motion Isolation
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Lumbar Motion Isolation
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Peak Acceleration @ Head/Feet
0.51 g
1.14 g
Dissipation Time @ Head/Feet
0.39 s
0.37 s
Peak Acceleration @ Lumbar
2.57 g
2.85 g
Dissipation Time @ Lumbar
0.34 s
0.40 s
Edge Support
7.4
7.3
Naturalistic Loading Pad Video
Naturalistic Loading Pad
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Small Platen
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Naturalistic Loading Pad Indentation
143 mm
159 mm
Small Platen Indentation @ 0 mm From Edge
169 mm
181 mm
Small Platen Indentation @ 150 mm From Edge
142 mm
162 mm
Increased Indentation @ Mattress Edge
27 mm
20 mm
Cooling
7.9
8.0
Cooling Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Transferred Over 1st Hour
56 kJ
65 kJ
Energy Transferred Over 8 Hours
171 kJ
169 kJ
Components
Cover
Cover Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Sleeping Surface Material
Polyester, Viscose, Barrier Coating, Fillament Poly
Polyester, Polyethylene
Removable
No
No
Machine Washable
No
No
Edge Construction
Edge Support Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Edge Component
Pocket Coils
Pocket Coils
Foam Layer Material
Foam Layer Material Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Quilted Top Fill
N/A
N/A
Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
Memory Foam
Memory Foam
Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
Memory Foam
Memory Foam
Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
N/A
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
N/A
N/A
Transition Foam
Polyfoam
Polyfoam
Support Foam
N/A
N/A
Foam Layer Mass Density
5.7
6.6
Quilted Top Fill
N/A
N/A
Quilted Top Fill Foam Density vs. Reference
N/A
N/A
Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
34 kg/m³ (2.1 lb/cu.ft.)
41 kg/m³ (2.6 lb/cu.ft.)
Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet Density vs. Reference
0.5
0.6
Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
34 kg/m³ (2.1 lb/cu.ft.)
41 kg/m³ (2.6 lb/cu.ft.)
Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar Density vs. Reference
0.5
0.6
Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
N/A
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet Density vs. Reference
N/A
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
N/A
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar Density vs. Reference
N/A
N/A
Transition Foam
26 kg/m³ (1.6 lb/cu.ft.)
31 kg/m³ (1.9 lb/cu.ft.)
Transition Foam Density vs. Reference
0.8
1.1
Support Foam
N/A
N/A
Support Foam Density vs Reference
N/A
N/A
Foam Layer Thickness
Foam Layer Thickness Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Quilted Top
N/A
N/A
Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
2.5 cm (1.0")
7.6 cm (3.0")
Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
2.5 cm (1.0")
7.6 cm (3.0")
Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
N/A
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
N/A
N/A
Transition Foam
5.0 cm (2.0")
4.6 cm (1.8")
Support Foam
N/A
N/A
Spring Layer Dimensions
Spring Layer Height Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Spring Layer Density Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Comfort Layer Height
N/A
N/A
Comfort Layer Coil Density
N/A
Comfort Layer Coil Gauge
N/A
N/A
Support Layer Height
20.5 cm (8.1")
20.5 cm (8.1")
Support Layer Coil Density
252 coils/m² (23 coils/ft²)
Support Layer Coil Gauge @ Head/Feet
15 gauge
15 gauge
Support Layer Coil Gauge @ Lumbar
15 gauge
15 gauge
Foam Layer Firmness
Comfort Layer IPD
Preview Graph
Transition & Support Layer IPD
Preview Graph
Quilted Top Fill 25% IPD
N/A
Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet 25% IPD
1.4 kPa
Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar 25% IPD
1.4 kPa
Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet 25% IPD
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar 25% IPD
N/A
Transition Foam 25% IPD
4.5 kPa
Support Foam 25% IPD
N/A
Spring Layer Firmness
Comfort Layer Firmness
Support Layer Firmness
Preview Graph
Spring Layer Firmness
Normalized Comfort Layer Stiffness @ Head/Feet
N/A
Normalized Comfort Layer Stiffness @ Lumbar
N/A
Normalized Support Layer Stiffness @ Head/Feet
53 Pa/mm
Normalized Support Layer Stiffness @ Lumbar
57 Pa/mm
Foam Layer Resilience
Foam Layer Resilience Video
Quilted Top Fill
N/A
N/A
Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
8%
9%
Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
8%
9%
Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
N/A
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
N/A
N/A
Transition Foam
41%
52%
Support Foam
N/A
N/A
Spring Layer Bounciness
Comfort Spring Layer Bounciness Video
Support Spring Layer Bounciness Video
Comfort Spring Layer Maximum Rebound Height
N/A
Support Spring Layer Maximum Rebound Height
31.0 cm (12.2")
Check Price
California King
Classic Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Amazon
California King
Luxe Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Nectar
Full
Classic Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Full
Luxe Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Nectar
King
Classic Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Amazon
King
Luxe Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Queen
Classic Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Queen
Luxe Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Split King
Luxe Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Nectar
Twin
Classic Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Nectar
Twin
Luxe Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Twin XL
Classic Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Amazon
Twin XL
Luxe Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Nectar
To access
Become a member
unlimited full product reviews,
product prices, and
other exclusive site features
Nectar Classic Hybrid
Nectar Luxe Hybrid
Comments
Nectar Classic Hybrid vs Nectar Luxe Hybrid: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.