Saatva Latex Hybrid vs Nectar Classic Hybrid

Which Mattress Is Better?

Products

Saatva Latex Hybrid
Nectar Classic Hybrid

Tested using Methodology v1.0.1

Updated Oct 31, 2025 02:49 PM

SEE PRICE
Saatva

Tested using Methodology v1.0.1

Updated Oct 20, 2025 10:04 PM

SEE PRICE
Nectar
  1. Recommended in 3 articles:
  2. Mattresses
  3. Firm
  4. Cooling
  1. Recommended in 1 article:
  2. Memory Foam

Our Verdict

Saatva Latex Hybrid

Nectar Classic Hybrid

The Saatva Latex Hybrid is a better mattress than the Nectar Classic Hybrid. It offers significantly better edge support than the Nectar, which extends the comfortable sleeping surface and makes it easier to get in and out of bed. Additionally, it's more responsive, allowing for easier movement around or changes in sleeping positions. The Saatva is also more cooling. It transfers enough heat to keep even hot sleepers cool. That said, the Nectar offers better motion dissipation, so if you sleep with a partner who tosses and turns, you may still prefer it.

0 

Variants

  • Latex Hybrid (Queen)
  • Classic Hybrid (Queen)

Check Price

Queen
Latex Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Saatva
Queen
Classic Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Nectar

Main Differences for
Sleeping (In Development)

Threshold 

0.10

Sleeping (In Development) 

8.6
7.8

Edge Support 
 

9.1
7.4

Cooling 
 

8.4
7.8

Full Comparison

Design

Style 
 

Style Picture  

Mattress Type 
 

Hybrid
Hybrid

Bed-In-A-Box 
 

No
Yes

Quilted Top Layer 
 

Yes
No

Grab Handles 
 

Yes
Yes

Thickness  

31.0 cm (12.2")
30.8 cm (12.1")
Show Text 
Performance

Firmness 
 

Head/Feet Firmness  

See details
See details

Lumbar Firmness  

See details
See details

Firmness Video  

Normalized Stiffness @ Head/Feet 
 

58 Pa/mm
58 Pa/mm

Normalized Stiffness @ Lumbar 
 

60 Pa/mm
56 Pa/mm

Firmness Level 
 

Firm (60 Pa/mm)
Medium-Firm (56 Pa/mm)
Show Text 

Bounciness 
 

Bounciness Video  

Maximum Rebound Height 
 

25.0 cm (9.8")
16.5 cm (6.5")

Bounciness Level 
 

High (25 cm)
Moderate (16 cm)
Show Text 

Sinking & Contouring 
 

Sinking & Contouring Picture  

Sinking Depth 
 

4.3 cm (1.7")
4.3 cm (1.7")

Diameter Of Distortion 
 

24.4 cm (9.6")
26.1 cm (10.3")

Sinking Level 
 

Low (4 cm)
Low (4 cm)

Contouring Level 
 

High (24 cm)
Moderate (26 cm)
Show Text 

Responsiveness 
 

9.8
7.3

Responsiveness Video  

Response Time 
 

0.1 s
1.2 s
Show Text 

Motion Isolation 
 

7.8
8.6

Motion Isolation Video  

Head/Feet Motion Isolation  

See details
See details

Lumbar Motion Isolation  

See details
See details

Peak Acceleration @ Head/Feet 
 

0.86 g
0.51 g

Dissipation Time @ Head/Feet 
 

0.67 s
0.39 s

Peak Acceleration @ Lumbar 
 

2.26 g
2.57 g

Dissipation Time @ Lumbar 
 

0.72 s
0.34 s
Show Text 

Edge Support 
 

9.1
7.4

Naturalistic Loading Pad Video  

Naturalistic Loading Pad  

See details
See details

Small Platen  

See details
See details

Naturalistic Loading Pad Indentation 
 

116 mm
143 mm

Small Platen Indentation @ 0 mm From Edge 
 

132 mm
169 mm

Small Platen Indentation @ 150 mm From Edge 
 

115 mm
142 mm

Increased Indentation @ Mattress Edge 
 

17 mm
27 mm
Show Text 

Cooling 
 

8.4
7.8

Cooling Graph  

See details
See details

Energy Transferred Over 1st Hour 
 

67 kJ
56 kJ

Energy Transferred Over 8 Hours 
 

187 kJ
171 kJ
Show Text 
Components

Cover 
 

Cover Picture  

Sleeping Surface Material 
 

Organic Cotton
Polyester, Viscose, Barrier Coating, Fillament Poly

Removable 
 

No
No

Machine Washable 
 

No
No
Show Text 

Edge Construction 
 

Edge Support Picture  

Edge Component 
 

Pocket Coils
Pocket Coils
Show Text 

Foam Layer Material 
 

Foam Layer Material Picture  

Quilted Top Fill  

Wool
N/A

Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

Latex
Memory Foam

Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

Latex
Memory Foam

Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

N/A
N/A

Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

N/A
N/A

Transition Foam  

N/A
Polyfoam

Support Foam  

N/A
N/A
Show Text 

Foam Layer Mass Density 
 

8.3
5.7

Quilted Top Fill  

N/A
N/A

Quilted Top Fill Foam Density vs. Reference 
 

N/A
N/A

Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

76 kg/m³ (4.8 lb/cu.ft.)
34 kg/m³ (2.1 lb/cu.ft.)

Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet Density vs. Reference 
 

1.6
0.5

Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

76 kg/m³ (4.8 lb/cu.ft.)
34 kg/m³ (2.1 lb/cu.ft.)

Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar Density vs. Reference 
 

1.6
0.5

Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

N/A
N/A

Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet Density vs. Reference 
 

N/A
N/A

Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

N/A
N/A

Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar Density vs. Reference 
 

N/A
N/A

Transition Foam  

N/A
26 kg/m³ (1.6 lb/cu.ft.)

Transition Foam Density vs. Reference 
 

N/A
0.8

Support Foam  

N/A
N/A

Support Foam Density vs Reference 
 

N/A
N/A
Show Text 

Foam Layer Thickness 
 

Foam Layer Thickness Picture  

Quilted Top 
 

3.3 cm (1.3")
N/A

Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

7.5 cm (3.0")
2.5 cm (1.0")

Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

7.5 cm (3.0")
2.5 cm (1.0")

Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

N/A
N/A

Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

N/A
N/A

Transition Foam  

N/A
5.0 cm (2.0")

Support Foam  

N/A
N/A
Show Text 

Spring Layer Dimensions 
 

Spring Layer Height Picture  

Spring Layer Density Picture  

Comfort Layer Height 
 

N/A
N/A

Comfort Layer Coil Density 
 

N/A
N/A

Comfort Layer Coil Gauge 
 

N/A
N/A

Support Layer Height 
 

21.5 cm (8.5")
20.5 cm (8.1")

Support Layer Coil Density 
 

278 coils/m² (26 coils/ft²)
252 coils/m² (23 coils/ft²)

Support Layer Coil Gauge @ Head/Feet 
 

14 gauge
15 gauge

Support Layer Coil Gauge @ Lumbar 
 

14 gauge
15 gauge
Show Text 

Foam Layer Firmness 
 

Comfort Layer IPD  

See details
See details

Transition & Support Layer IPD  

See details

Quilted Top Fill 25% IPD 
 

N/A
N/A

Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet 25% IPD 
 

1.5 kPa
1.4 kPa

Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar 25% IPD 
 

1.9 kPa
1.4 kPa

Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet 25% IPD 
 

N/A
N/A

Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar 25% IPD 
 

N/A
N/A

Transition Foam 25% IPD 
 

N/A
4.5 kPa

Support Foam 25% IPD 
 

N/A
N/A
Show Text 

Spring Layer Firmness 
 

Comfort Layer Firmness  

Support Layer Firmness  

See details
See details

Spring Layer Firmness  

Normalized Comfort Layer Stiffness @ Head/Feet 
 

N/A
N/A

Normalized Comfort Layer Stiffness @ Lumbar 
 

N/A
N/A

Normalized Support Layer Stiffness @ Head/Feet 
 

61 Pa/mm
53 Pa/mm

Normalized Support Layer Stiffness @ Lumbar 
 

64 Pa/mm
57 Pa/mm
Show Text 

Foam Layer Resilience 
 

Foam Layer Resilience Video  

Quilted Top Fill  

N/A
N/A

Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

33%
8%

Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

40%
8%

Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet  

N/A
N/A

Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar  

N/A
N/A

Transition Foam  

N/A
41%

Support Foam  

N/A
N/A
Show Text 

Spring Layer Bounciness 
 

Comfort Spring Layer Bounciness Video  

Support Spring Layer Bounciness Video  

Comfort Spring Layer Maximum Rebound Height 
 

N/A
N/A

Support Spring Layer Maximum Rebound Height 
 

35.0 cm (13.8")
31.0 cm (12.2")
Show Text 

Check Price

Queen
Latex Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Saatva
Queen
Classic Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Nectar

Saatva Latex Hybrid

Nectar Classic Hybrid

Comments

  1. Comparison

Saatva Latex Hybrid vs Nectar Classic Hybrid: Main Discussion

What do you think of these products? Let us know below.


Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Insiders have direct access to buying advice on our insider forum.

PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
No comments yet, refresh to see new ones