Products
Tested using Methodology v1.2
Updated Mar 05, 2026 06:11 PM
SEE PRICE
Zinus
Tested using Methodology v1.2
Updated Mar 04, 2026 01:12 PM
SEE PRICE
Walmart.com
Mattress Type
Foam
Bed-In-A-Box
Yes
Upper Comfort Foam @ LumbarMemory Foam
Firmness Level
Firm (65 Pa/mm)
Mattress Type
Hybrid
Bed-In-A-Box
Yes
Upper Comfort Foam @ LumbarMemory Foam
Firmness Level
Medium-Firm (54 Pa/mm)
Our Verdict
Zinus Original Green Tea 2024
Allswell Hybrid
The Allswell Hybrid performs better than the Zinus Green Tea 2024 in most ways. The Allswell offers significantly better cooling, has sturdier edges, and offers a more responsive feel. However, if you like the hugging feel of slow-moving memory foam, you might prefer the Zinus, which has lower responsiveness and more contouring upper comfort layers.
Variants
- Original Green Tea 2024 (Queen)
- Hybrid (Queen)
Check Price
Queen
Original Green Tea 2024
SEE PRICE
Zinus
Queen
Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Walmart.com
Main Differences for
Side Sleeping
Side Sleeping
Threshold
Side Sleeping
6.4
6.7
Full Comparison
Design
Style
Style Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Mattress Type
Foam
Hybrid
Bed-In-A-Box
Yes
Yes
Quilted Top Layer
No
Yes
Grab Handles
No
No
Thickness
23.7 cm (9.3")
26.7 cm (10.5")
Performance
Firmness
Head/Feet Firmness
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Lumbar Firmness
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness Video
Normalized Stiffness @ Head/Feet
55 Pa/mm
50 Pa/mm
Normalized Stiffness @ Lumbar
65 Pa/mm
54 Pa/mm
Firmness Level
Firm (65 Pa/mm)
Medium-Firm (54 Pa/mm)
Body Conformity
6.0
6.6
Shoulder Indentation vs. Body Weight
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Indent @ 50 kg (110 lb)
32 mm (1.3")
36 mm (1.4")
Indent @ 80 kg (176 lb)
53 mm (2.1")
59 mm (2.3")
Indent @ 110 kg (242 lb)
70 mm (2.8")
79 mm (3.1")
Support
7.7
7.5
Pelvis Indentation vs. Body Weight
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Indent Difference @ 50 kg (110 lb)
10 mm (0.4")
12 mm (0.5")
Indent Difference @ 80 kg (176 lb)
15 mm (0.6")
19 mm (0.7")
Indent Difference @ 110 kg (242 lb)
18 mm (0.7")
20 mm (0.8")
Bounciness
5.7
7.5
Bounciness Video
Maximum Rebound Height
7.0 cm (2.8")
16.0 cm (6.3")
Comfort Layers Envelopment
7.3
6.6
Sinking & Contouring Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Sinking Depth
3.8 cm (1.5")
3.8 cm (1.5")
Diameter Of Distortion
21.2 cm (8.4")
25.8 cm (10.1")
Responsiveness
4.3
8.2
Responsiveness Video
Response Time
3.3 s
0.8 s
Motion Isolation
8.2
8.8
Motion Isolation Video
Head/Feet Motion Isolation
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Lumbar Motion Isolation
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Peak Acceleration @ Head/Feet
0.53 g
0.75 g
Dissipation Time @ Head/Feet
0.24 s
0.40 s
Peak Acceleration @ Lumbar
4.58 g
2.25 g
Dissipation Time @ Lumbar
0.19 s
0.33 s
Edge Support
5.6
8.7
Naturalistic Loading Pad Video
Naturalistic Loading Pad
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Small Platen
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Naturalistic Loading Pad Indentation
160 mm
116 mm
Small Platen Indentation @ 0 mm From Edge
181 mm
137 mm
Small Platen Indentation @ 150 mm From Edge
133 mm
114 mm
Increased Indentation @ Mattress Edge
47 mm
23 mm
Cooling
5.6
8.3
Cooling Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Transferred Over 1st Hour
47 kJ
59 kJ
Energy Transferred Over 8 Hours
116 kJ
183 kJ
Components
Cover
Cover Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Sleeping Surface Material
Polyester
Not Provided by Manufacturer
Removable
Yes
No
Machine Washable
No
No
Edge Construction
Edge Support Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Edge Component
None
Pocket Coils
Foam Layer Material
Foam Layer Material Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Quilted Top Fill
N/A
Polyfoam + Fiber Fill
Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
Memory Foam
Memory Foam
Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
Memory Foam
Memory Foam
Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
N/A
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
N/A
N/A
Transition Foam
Polyfoam
Polyfoam
Support Foam
Polyfoam
N/A
Foam Layer Mass Density
6.0
6.0
Quilted Top Fill
N/A
22 kg/m³ (1.4 lb/cu.ft.)
Quilted Top Fill Foam Density vs. Reference
N/A
0.5
Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
34 kg/m³ (2.1 lb/cu.ft.)
36 kg/m³ (2.2 lb/cu.ft.)
Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet Density vs. Reference
0.5
0.6
Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
34 kg/m³ (2.1 lb/cu.ft.)
36 kg/m³ (2.2 lb/cu.ft.)
Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar Density vs. Reference
0.5
0.6
Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
N/A
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet Density vs. Reference
N/A
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
N/A
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar Density vs. Reference
N/A
N/A
Transition Foam
28 kg/m³ (1.8 lb/cu.ft.)
29 kg/m³ (1.8 lb/cu.ft.)
Transition Foam Density vs. Reference
0.9
0.9
Support Foam
26 kg/m³ (1.6 lb/cu.ft.)
N/A
Support Foam Density vs Reference
0.8
N/A
Foam Layer Thickness
Foam Layer Thickness Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Quilted Top
N/A
3.0 cm (1.2")
Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
3.9 cm (1.5")
4.0 cm (1.6")
Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
3.9 cm (1.5")
4.0 cm (1.6")
Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
N/A
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
N/A
N/A
Transition Foam
6.1 cm (2.4")
1.8 cm (0.7")
Support Foam
14.6 cm (5.7")
N/A
Spring Layer Dimensions
Spring Layer Height Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Spring Layer Density Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Comfort Layer Height
N/A
N/A
Comfort Layer Coil Density
N/A
N/A
Comfort Layer Coil Gauge
N/A
N/A
Support Layer Height
N/A
18.5 cm (7.3")
Support Layer Coil Density
N/A
233 coils/m² (22 coils/ft²)
Support Layer Coil Gauge @ Head/Feet
N/A
14 gauge
Support Layer Coil Gauge @ Lumbar
N/A
14 gauge
Foam Layer Firmness
Comfort Layer IPD
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Transition & Support Layer IPD
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Quilted Top Fill 25% IPD
N/A
2.9 kPa
Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet 25% IPD
1.5 kPa
2.2 kPa
Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar 25% IPD
1.5 kPa
2.2 kPa
Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet 25% IPD
N/A
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar 25% IPD
N/A
N/A
Transition Foam 25% IPD
3.1 kPa
3.7 kPa
Support Foam 25% IPD
3.5 kPa
N/A
Spring Layer Firmness
Comfort Layer Firmness
Support Layer Firmness
Preview Graph
Spring Layer Firmness
Normalized Comfort Layer Stiffness @ Head/Feet
N/A
N/A
Normalized Comfort Layer Stiffness @ Lumbar
N/A
N/A
Normalized Support Layer Stiffness @ Head/Feet
N/A
75 Pa/mm
Normalized Support Layer Stiffness @ Lumbar
N/A
76 Pa/mm
Foam Layer Resilience
Foam Layer Resilience Video
Quilted Top Fill
N/A
39%
Upper Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
6%
12%
Upper Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
6%
12%
Lower Comfort Foam @ Head/Feet
N/A
N/A
Lower Comfort Foam @ Lumbar
N/A
N/A
Transition Foam
40%
45%
Support Foam
44%
N/A
Spring Layer Bounciness
Comfort Spring Layer Bounciness Video
Support Spring Layer Bounciness Video
Comfort Spring Layer Maximum Rebound Height
N/A
N/A
Support Spring Layer Maximum Rebound Height
N/A
34.0 cm (13.4")
Check Price
Queen
Original Green Tea 2024
SEE PRICE
Zinus
Queen
Hybrid
SEE PRICE
Walmart.com
To access
Become a member
unlimited full product reviews,
product prices, and
other exclusive site features
Zinus Original Green Tea 2024
Allswell Hybrid
Comments
Zinus Original Green Tea 2024 vs Allswell Hybrid: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.