Brooks Ghost Max 2  Running Shoe Review

Reviewed Nov 03, 2025 at 05:16pm
Tested using Methodology v0.8.1 
Brooks Ghost Max 2
6.3
Marathon Racing 
5.8
5K/10K Racing 
5.5
Energy Return 
6.4
Cushioning 
7.9
Lateral Stability 
 0
Notice: This running shoes was replaced by Brooks Ghost Max 3

We've tested these running shoes to expand our database and allow users to compare results to help with their buying decisions. We don't expect to write a full review, but if you have any questions about this product, please let us know!

Our Verdict

6.3
Marathon Racing 

Pros
  • Very Stable Laterally. 

Cons
  • Low Energy Return.

  • Heavy.

  • Not Plated.

5.8
5K/10K Racing 

Pros
None
Cons
  • Low Energy Return.

  • Heavy.

  • Not Plated.

5.5
Energy Return 

Pros
None
Cons
  • Not enough responsiveness.

6.4
Cushioning 

Pros
  • Overall Acceptable Protection.

Cons
  • It is quite firm.

7.9
Lateral Stability 

Pros
  • Very Stable Laterally. 

  • Wide Base Platform.

  • Firmer Foam Sole. 

Cons
None
  • 6.3
    Marathon Racing
  • 5.8
    5K/10K Racing

  • Performance Usages

  • 5.5
    Energy Return
  • 6.4
    Cushioning
  • 7.9
    Lateral Stability
  • Changelog

    1.  Updated Nov 03, 2025: Review published.
    2.  Updated Sep 03, 2025: Early access published.
    3.  Updated Jul 18, 2025: Our testers have started testing this product.
    How We Test Running Shoes
    How We Test Running Shoes

    We've recently started buying and testing running shoes with a very data-oriented approach. While we're just getting started, our methodology already has dozens of tests to help you make the right purchasing decision for your needs. Not only do we use high-end equipment to gather objective data, but we also order multiple sizes of the same shoes for team members to be able to log in miles. This real-world testing is done at various paces and conditions, and with different types of workouts, to cover all the bases. This allows us to verify our results and ensure they align with what you might feel with a specific pair.

    Test Results

    perceptual testing image
    Sort:
    RATINGS
    Category:
    All
    Design
    4.5
    Weight
    Weight
    297.3 g (10.49 oz)
    Stack Heights
    Heel Stack Height
    39.1 mm
    Forefoot Stack Height
    31.6 mm
    Heel-To-Toe Drop
    7.5 mm
    Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
    6.0 mm
    External Shape
    Outsole Heel Width
    91 mm (3.6")
    Outsole Arch Width
    82 mm (3.2")
    Outsole Forefoot Width
    114 mm (4.5")
    Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
    2.33
    Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
    3.61
    Internal Shape
    Internal Length
    281 mm (11.1")
    Internal Heel Width
    68 mm (2.7")
    Internal Forefoot Width
    92 mm (3.6")
    Wide Sizing Available
    Yes
    Other Features
    Tongue Gusset Type
    Non-gusseted
    Plate
    None
    Performance
    5.1
    Heel Energy Return
    Heel Energy Return
    76.6%
    5.7
    Forefoot Energy Return
    Forefoot Energy Return
    77.4%
    6.1
    Heel Cushioning
    Energy Absorbed At 300N
    0.96 J
    Energy Absorbed At 600N
    3.11 J
    Energy Absorbed At 900N
    6.16 J
    6.6
    Forefoot Cushioning
    Energy Absorbed At 300N
    0.89 J
    Energy Absorbed At 600N
    2.73 J
    Energy Absorbed At 900N
    4.92 J
    7.1
    Heel Firmness
    Average Firmness 0 To 300N
    44.4 N/mm
    Average Firmness 300 To 600N
    62.4 N/mm
    Average Firmness 600 To 900N
    74.4 N/mm
    8.5
    Forefoot Firmness
    Average Firmness 0 To 300N
    48.9 N/mm
    Average Firmness 300 To 600N
    72.8 N/mm
    Average Firmness 600 To 900N
    103.0 N/mm