We've tested these running shoes to expand our database and allow users to compare results to help with their buying decisions. We don't expect to write a full review, but if you have any questions about this product, please let us know!
We've bought and tested more than 250 running shoes. Every pair purchased with our own money, never supplied or sponsored by brands. Our data-driven tests are designed to go beyond marketing claims, and since every shoe goes through the exact same methodology, you can directly compare results to find the right pair for your needs.
Popular Running Shoe Comparisons
The HOKA Arahi 7 and HOKA Arahi 8 are both light stability shoes, and though both serve the needs of most overpronators well, there are a few important distinctions. The Arahi 7 is the lighter, previous iteration of the line, and is slightly more stable. The mid-drop is best suited to midfoot strikers, but it can accommodate all types of runners. The Arahi 8, on the other hand, is a key overhaul. It has much more stack underfoot, and is way more cushioned through the heel, making it the better option for heel strikers. It's a softer shoe with more cushion and responsiveness. Despite the hit to stability, we'd still recommend most runners go for the Arahi 8 unless there's a significantly better deal on the Arahi 7.
The ASICS GEL-KAYANO 32 and the HOKA Arahi 7 are both support-oriented daily trainers, but they approach stability and comfort quite differently. The Arahi 7 is lighter and leans into natural guidance without added bulk, making it feel nimbler underfoot. However, its lower stack height and firmer foam make it noticeably harsher over longer distances, especially for heel strikers or heavier runners. In contrast, the ASICS offers a plusher, more cushioned ride with better impact absorption and a more traditional support feel thanks to its 4D Guidance system. It provides more underfoot protection and a smoother, more stable transition, but at the cost of added weight and a bulkier sensation overall.