PUMA Magnify NITRO 3  Running Shoe Review

Review updated Oct 21, 2025 at 03:51pm
Writing modified Dec 02, 2025 at 03:20pm
Tested using Methodology v0.9 
PUMA Magnify NITRO 3
7.1
Marathon Racing 
6.8
5K/10K Racing 
7.8
Energy Return 
7.3
Cushioning 
7.8
Lateral Stability 
 0

The PUMA Magnify NITRO 3 is the German brand's updated, modern interpretation of a daily trainer, and marks a shift for the Magnify series. Although the midsole bears the same NITRO branding as its Magnify NITRO 2 predecessor, they are not the same: the 3rd iteration has a nitrogen-infused PEBA foam that feels softer and bouncier, elevating it into the upper ranks of daily trainers, with the versatility to work at various paces. The Magnify NITRO 3 has a slightly rockered geometry that is less aggressive than the speed shoes in PUMA's lineup, but still aids with leg turnover on longer runs.

Our Verdict

7.1
Marathon Racing 

The PUMA Magnify NITRO 3 is a surprisingly decent shoe for marathon racing, given that it is primarily intended as a daily trainer. The soft, bouncy NITRO midsole helps to protect legs over long distances, and the energy return is good, but the lack of a plate and the shoe's relatively higher weight compared to dedicated racing shoes make it a less competitive option for faster marathon runners.

Pros
  • Bouncy, energetic midsole.

Cons
  • Lack of plate in midsole.

  • Too heavy to be a competitive race shoe.

6.8
5K/10K Racing 

The PUMA Magnify NITRO 3 is alright as a middle-distance race shoe, but too heavy to be a truly speedy racer. Good energy return and a forefoot that firms up considerably when force is applied make it a reasonable, if not particularly impressive, option for 5 to 10K races.

Pros
  • Bouncy, energetic midsole.

  • Forefoot becomes firmer at faster paces.

Cons
  • Lack of plate in midsole.

  • Too heavy to be a competitive race shoe.

7.8
Energy Return 

The PUMA Magnify NITRO 3 delivers very good energy return for a daily trainer. The nitrogen-infused PEBA-based foam in the midsole helps to create a bouncy effect.

Pros
  • Bouncy, energetic midsole.

Cons
None
7.3
Cushioning 

The PUMA Magnify NITRO 3 has very good cushioning in the heel, but the forefoot protection is just okay. Although it is not the most maximally cushioned shoe in PUMA's lineup, the soft Nitrogen-infused PEBA midsole absorbs impact relatively well.

Pros
  • Protective heel.

Cons
  • Forefoot isn't as well padded.

7.8
Lateral Stability 

The PUMA Magnify NITRO 3 offers very good stability, as befits a daily trainer. Although it doesn't have dedicated stability features, the supportive structure around the arch and the wide platform contribute to an overall stable ride. The soft heel foam could cause stability problems for heavy heel strikers.

Pros
  • Supportive, gently structured heel collar.

  • Forefoot becomes firmer at faster paces.

Cons
  • Lack of plate in midsole.

  • 7.1
    Marathon Racing
  • 6.8
    5K/10K Racing

  • Performance Usages

  • 7.8
    Energy Return
  • 7.3
    Cushioning
  • 7.8
    Lateral Stability
  • Changelog

    1.  Updated Dec 02, 2025: 

      We updated the Popular Running Shoe Comparisons to include the latest (fourth) iteration of the PUMA Velocity NITRO in PUMA's lineup.

    2.  Updated Oct 28, 2025: We've converted this review to Test Bench 0.9, which adds a Forefoot Long Run Cushioning test to our performance section. Read more in our changelog.
    3.  Updated Oct 21, 2025: 

      We updated the Pros & Cons, Lateral Stability, Energy Return, Cushioning, Heel Cushioning, Forefoot Cushioning, and Forefoot Energy Return boxes to align with the latest test bench and revised the side-by-side comparisons to keep the review accurate.

    4.  Updated Oct 20, 2025: We've converted this review to Test Bench 0.8.2, which updates our methodology for the impact force range used in our compression tests to improve their accuracy. This also affects all usage and performance usage boxes using those compression tests as score components.

    Differences Between Sizes And Variants

    We bought and tested the PUMA Magnify NITRO 3 in men's US size 9, as indicated on the label for our pair. The colorway shown here is PUMA Black-Speed Blue,  and the shoe is available in several other colorways, including PUMA Black-PUMA White | PUMA White-Warm White | Speed Blue-PUMA Black | and Gray Echo-Speed Blue-PUMA White for men. The women's version is available in Sea Glass-Mint Melt | PUMA Black-Mint Melt | PUMA White-PUMA Silver | and PUMA Black-PUMA White. Wide versions are not available for this model.

    Popular Running Shoe Comparisons

    The PUMA Magnify NITRO 3 stands alongside other modern daily trainers that are built for comfort and versatility. With its upgraded, PEBA-based midsole, it joins a growing category of running shoes that incorporate supercritical foams into everyday shoes. The Magnify NITRO 3 holds up well against other daily trainers like the HOKA Clifton 10 or Saucony Triumph 22, delivering significantly better energy return than either of these competitors. However, the Magnify NITRO 3 has a relatively narrow arch, and Puma's method of gusseting the tongue can hug the foot so tightly that it becomes constricting when the foot swells during longer runs. Therefore, runners with wider feet who are looking for a bouncy daily trainer might prefer the ASICS NOVABLAST 5.

    Among PUMA's lineup of daily trainers, the Magnify NITRO 3 sits between the PUMA Velocity NITRO 4, a firmer, less cushioned classic trainer, and the PUMA MagMax NITRO, a heavier, max-cushioned shoe. It is unplated, unlike the Deviate series, which includes the PUMA Deviate NITRO 3 speed trainer and the PUMA Deviate NITRO Elite 3 racing shoe.

    For more options, check out our recommendations for the best running shoes, as well as the best long-distance running shoes and the best shoes for running a marathon.

    Nike Vomero 18

    The PUMA Magnify NITRO 3 and the Nike Vomero 18 represent slightly different interpretations of the modern workhorse shoe. The Nike is heavier, higher stacked, and of more stout construction, with a dual-density midsole and thicker, less stretchy upper. The PUMA is lighter and bouncier, with more even cushioning throughout the midsole, whereas the Nike has a more pronounced difference between the soft heel and firmer forefoot.

    PUMA MagMax NITRO

    The PUMA MagMax NITRO and the PUMA Magnify NITRO 3 are a bit like siblings who have developed their own separate personalities. The MagMax is by far the more cushioned shoe, with a taller stack height, but a less pronounced heel-to-toe drop. In addition to a thicker midsole, it also has a more extensive PUMA GRIP outsole, giving it more grip and ground feel. The Magnify NITRO 3 is the lighter and more energetic of the two, and the combination of better stability and bounciness makes it better suited to varying paces in long runs than its sibling shoe. 

    ASICS NOVABLAST 5

    The PUMA Magnify NITRO 3 and ASICS NOVABLAST 5 are both bouncy, versatile trainers built for everyday use. The NOVABLAST 5 packs more cushioning underfoot for a plusher ride but sacrifices some energy return, most notably in the forefoot, where the Magnify NITRO 3 delivers much better return. The fit of the ASICS might be more accommodating to runners with wider feet, as PUMA's sizing is narrower in both the heel and forefoot.

    New Balance FuelCell Rebel v5

    The PUMA Magnify NITRO 3 and New Balance FuelCell Rebel v5 are both lively trainers that nicely balance cushioning and stability. The Rebel v5 is significantly lighter and has a lower heel-to-toe drop than the Magnify NITRO 3, making the New Balance shoe marginally more stable. The plush foam in the Rebel v5's midsole provides a bit better protection, but both shoes have great cushioning. The primary advantage the PUMA shoe has is its superior energy return; while the Rebel v5 has some bounce, it lags well behind the Magnify NITRO 3 in both the forefoot and the heel's ability to respond to force.

    How We Test Running Shoes
    How We Test Running Shoes

    We've recently started buying and testing running shoes with a very data-oriented approach. While we're just getting started, our methodology already has dozens of tests to help you make the right purchasing decision for your needs. Not only do we use high-end equipment to gather objective data, but we also order multiple sizes of the same shoes for team members to be able to log in miles. This real-world testing is done at various paces and conditions, and with different types of workouts, to cover all the bases. This allows us to verify our results and ensure they align with what you might feel with a specific pair.

    Test Results

    perceptual testing image
    Sort:
    RATINGS
    Category:
    All
    Design
    6.0
    Weight
    Weight
    261.0 g (9.21 oz)

    The Magnify NITRO 3 is well within the daily trainer weight class, but toward the lower end, weighing in much lighter than the Nike Vomero 18 or Saucony Triumph 22, but slightly more than the ASICS NOVABLAST 5. The shoe can feel bottom-heavy, though.

    Stack Heights
    Heel Stack Height
    38.7 mm
    Forefoot Stack Height
    28.5 mm
    Heel-To-Toe Drop
    10.2 mm
    Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
    10.0 mm
    External Shape
    Outsole Heel Width
    94 mm (3.7")
    Outsole Arch Width
    71 mm (2.8")
    Outsole Forefoot Width
    113 mm (4.4")
    Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
    2.43
    Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
    3.96
    Internal Shape
    Internal Length
    281 mm (11.1")
    Internal Heel Width
    65 mm (2.6")
    Internal Forefoot Width
    91 mm (3.6")
    Wide Sizing Available
    No

    Like other PUMA shoes, the Magnify Nitro 3 is on the narrower side, and the sizing runs slightly long.

    Other Features
    Tongue Gusset Type
    Semi-gusseted
    Plate
    None

    PUMA's method of attaching the elastic gusseting to the tongue can feel constricting around the arch for some runners, exacerbating the narrow fit for wider feet.

    Performance
    7.4
    Heel Energy Return
    See details on graph tool
    Heel Energy Return
    77.6%

    The heel energy return is decent, especially for a daily trainer, with the midsole releasing more energy in the rear foot than even some dedicated speed shoes like the Deviate NITRO 3, aiding in smoother, more efficient stride transitions.

    7.9
    Forefoot Energy Return
    See details on graph tool
    Forefoot Energy Return
    80.0%

    The forefoot is even springier than the heel, with very good energy return that contributes to the overall bouncy feel.

    7.7
    Heel Cushioning
    See details on graph tool
    Energy Absorbed At 550N
    3.56 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1100N
    9.28 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1900N
    15.78 J

    The heel has very good cushioning, and the soft NITRO foam will ensure soft landings for heel strikers, especially those who apply low to normal force when hitting the ground.

    6.9
    Forefoot Cushioning
    See details on graph tool
    Energy Absorbed At 800N
    4.49 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1300N
    7.42 J
    Energy Absorbed At 2050N
    10.60 J

    The cushioning under the forefoot will offer a distinct feel depending on the runner. Those who don't apply a lot of force upon each strike, such as lighter and/or slower runners, will find it well cushioned. However, more powerful runners will find the midsole harsher and a lot less protective. Overall, it is not as plush as the MagMax Nitro or the ASICS NOVABLAST 5.

    5.7
    Heel Firmness
    See details on graph tool
    Firmness At 550N
    52.9 N/mm
    Firmness At 1100N
    115.3 N/mm
    Firmness At 1900N
    255.9 N/mm

    The heel is not particularly firm, even at higher efforts. The layer of PUMA GRIP rubber on the outsole is thinner than on some other models in the brand's lineup, including the MagMax and the Deviate Nitro 3, resulting in a less pronounced ground feel, and softer landings.

    8.6
    Forefoot Firmness
    See details on graph tool
    Firmness At 800N
    121.7 N/mm
    Firmness At 1300N
    254.9 N/mm
    Firmness At 2050N
    513.8 N/mm

    The Magnify NITRO 3 becomes significantly firmer when more force is applied, allowing for rapid toe-offs. The tradeoff is that it will be less protective over the course of long runs with higher efforts. 

    6.5
    Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
    See details on graph tool
    Energy Absorbed At 10km
    7.13 J
    Energy Absorbed At 20km
    6.97 J
    Energy Absorbed At 30km
    6.86 J
    Energy Absorbed At 40km
    6.76 J